ISSN Print: 1050-6934
Volumes:Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
Abstract of "The Ethics of Biological Engineering"
Harold P. Sjursen
Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Six MetroTech Center, Brooklyn, NY 11201
It is necessary to distinguish the ethics of biological engineering from biological ethics and biomedical ethics. The three fields, while overlapping and sharing some common issues, from the outset have different prima facie areas of concern. Biological ethics is perhaps the broadest and may encompass the concerns of the other two. Since this discussion concentrates on the ethics of biological engineering, a contrast between it and biomedical ethics is in order. One might argue that biological engineering ethics is subordinate to biomedical ethics since biological engineering for the most part is devoted to the conception, design, implementation and operation of medical devices. However correct this assessment may be, it does not throw into relief the aspects of biological engineering that are most controversial. In parsing out this distinction, it is not helpful to rely on the established distinctions of only a few years ago. As with any rapidly advancing technology, newly applied science has radically revised the agenda of possibilities.
|Begell Digital Portal||Begell Digital Library||eBooks||Journals||References & Proceedings||Research Collections|