SJR: 0.332 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89
ISSN Print: 1050-6934
Volumes:Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
Abstract of "How the Science of Complexity Challenges the Way We Do Ethics"
Center for Bioethics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
Our notions of ethical analysis are deeply informed by specific visions of science. This is clearly seen in our concepts of risk, as well as in principles of precaution. In both of these cases, we find an account of science that assumes that the world can be decomposed into bits and pieces, and that a perturbation of interest can be isolated and managed as a discrete event. This vision of science is at odds with several emerging areas in bioengineering, where complexity and evolutionary or ecological notions of adaptive systems provide alternative strategies for managing uncertainty. Although few can clearly identify the reasons for the dissonance, this divergence of visions can lead to a deep antipathy between scientists and engineers, on one hand, and ethicists and policy analysts, on the other. To overcome this gap, a far richer dialogue is needed between the two cultures, and certain essential features of both ethics and engineering need to be reconceptualized in such a way that proactive management of potential social disruptions is seen as a part of an iterative research and design activity, which modifies structures in the process of their unfolding development.
|Begell Digital Portal||Begell Digital Library||eBooks||Journals||References & Proceedings||Research Collections|