ISSN Print: 1050-6934
Volumes:Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
User's Guide to a Meta-Analysis about an Orthopaedic Implant
Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University,Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
CLARITY Research Group, McMaster University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Canada and Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Hamilton General Hospital, Canada
Meta-analyses can be an excellent method to summarize the existing literature of studies concerning orthopaedic implants and devices. It is important to understand how meta-analyses are conducted and to be able to evaluate whether a meta-analysis has strong methodological rigor to help with clinical decisions. This paper begins with an overview of what a meta-analysis is and why it is useful. The second section provides the important characteristics of conducting a meta-analysis. The third section will provide detail of how to interpret a meta-analysis, including topics such as the quality of the included studies, comparing the results between studies, pooling data, and how to interpret the results. The benefits and limitations are presented, along with recommendations of how to ensure future high-quality meta-analyses. Meta-analyses are useful for synthesizing the results of multiple primary studies and can provide excellent evidence for clinical decisions; however, it is important that methodological flaws are limited.
|Begell Digital Portal||Begell Digital Library||eBooks||Journals||References & Proceedings||Research Collections|