Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology
IF: 1.404 5-Year IF: 3.347 SJR: 0.706 SNIP: 0.55 CiteScore™: 2.19

ISSN Print: 1040-8401
ISSN Online: 2162-6472

Volume 40, 2020 Volume 39, 2019 Volume 38, 2018 Volume 37, 2017 Volume 36, 2016 Volume 35, 2015 Volume 34, 2014 Volume 33, 2013 Volume 32, 2012 Volume 31, 2011 Volume 30, 2010 Volume 29, 2009 Volume 28, 2008 Volume 27, 2007 Volume 26, 2006 Volume 25, 2005 Volume 24, 2004 Volume 23, 2003 Volume 22, 2002 Volume 21, 2001 Volume 20, 2000 Volume 19, 1999 Volume 18, 1998 Volume 17, 1997 Volume 16, 1996 Volume 15, 1995 Volume 14, 1994

Critical Reviews™ in Immunology

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v17.i1.40
pages 89-118

Accessory Molecule and Costimulation Requirements for CD4 T Cell Response

Michael Croft
Department of Biology and the Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
Caroline Dubey
Department of Biology and the Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093


T cell activation is brought about by recognition of peptide/MHC complexes on an antigen-presenting cell (APC) by the T cell receptor (TCR). However, in general this appears to be insufficient for the full development of T cell responses and therefore additional signals are required, provided by ligation of counter-receptors on the T cell by APC accessory molecules. Although many studies have suggested that B7 molecules (CD80/CD86) binding to CD28 induce this second signal, it is now evident that any one of a number of molecules may provide accessory function and that efficient response is only generated following multiple interactions. It has also become clear that T cells exist in varying states of activation or differentiation, and that requirements for accessory molecules and costimuli are not always equivalent. This review covers much of the recent data regarding accessory molecule regulation of T cell responses. A modified version of the two signal model is presented, suggesting that the major function of accessory molecules during the initial stages of activation is to augment the ability to signal through the TCR, and that the primary role of costimulatory signals is to allow IL-2 secretion and growth. The requirement for multiple accessory molecule interactions is discussed in relation to activation of naive T cells and how such interactions are less critical at the memory and effector stages. Finally, this new information is related to how T cells interact with varying APC and how these interactions may modulate T cell response.

Articles with similar content:

Accessory Molecule and Costimulation Requirements for CD4 T Cell Response
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.37, 2017, issue 2-6
Caroline Dubey, Michael Croft
Interaction between the Human NK Receptors and Their Ligands
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.20, 2000, issue 3
Mar Vales-Gomez, Hugh Reyburn, Jack L. Strominger
Cell Adhesion Molecules: Selectins and Integrins
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.19, 1999, issue 5-6
Francisco Sanchez-Madrid, Roberto González-Amaro
Role of SLAM Family Receptors and Specific Adapter SAP in Innate-Like Lymphocytes
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.34, 2014, issue 4
Jordi Sintes, Xavier Romero, Pablo Engel
Mechanical Cues for T Cell Activation: Role of Piezo1 Mechanosensors
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.39, 2019, issue 1
Dipyaman Ganguly, Chinky Shiu Chen Liu