ISSN Print: 0276-1459
ISSN Online: 1943-6181
Volume 30, 2018
Volume 29, 2017
Volume 28, 2016
Volume 27, 2015
Volume 26, 2014
Volume 25, 2013
Volume 24, 2012
Volume 23, 2011
Volume 22, 2010
Volume 21, 2009
Volume 20, 2008
Volume 19, 2007
Volume 18, 2006
Volume 17, 2005
Volume 16, 2004
Volume 15, 2003
Volume 14, 2002
Volume 13, 2001
Volume 12, 2000
Volume 11, 1999
Volume 10, 1998
Volume 9, 1997
Volume 8, 1994
Volume 7, 1993
Volume 6, 1992
Volume 5, 1990
Volume 4, 1989
Volume 3, 1987
Volume 2, 1986
Volume 1, 1982
Multiphase Science and Technology
HYDRODYNAMIC STUDY OF A HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE SYSTEM USING EXPERIMENTALLY AND NUMERICALLY DERIVED SURFACE SHEAR STRESSES
BIOMATH, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics. Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium ; Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
FlowConcept GmbH, Vahrenwalder Strasse 7, 30165 Hannover, Germany
BIOMATH, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics. Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models can be used to gain insight into the shear stresses induced by air sparging on submerged hollow fiber membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems. It was found that the average range of shear stresses obtained by the CFD model (0.30-0.60 Pa) and experimentally (0.39-0.69 Pa) were in good agreement, with an error less that 15%. Based on comparison of the cumulative frequency distribution of shear stresses from experiments and simulation, (i) moderate shear stresses (i.e., 50th percentile) were found to be accurately predicted (model: 0.24-0.45 Pa; experimental: 0.25-0.49 Pa) with an error of less than 5%; (ii) high shear stress (i.e., 90th percentile) predictions were much less accurate (model: 0.60-1.23 Pa; experimental: 1.04-1.90 Pa) with an error up to 38%. This was attributed to the fact that the CFD model only considers the two-phase flow (50th percentile) and not the movement of fibers. The latter is likely due to shielding effects or fiber sway, significantly affecting shear stresses at the high end of the distribution. However, this was not accounted for in the model in this study. Despite these deviations, the CFD model in its current state can be used to gain insight into the order of magnitude and shear stress distribution. Inclusion of fiber movement is recommended.
Bentzen, T. R., Ratkovich, N., Rasmussen, M. R., Heinen, N., and Hansen F., Energy efficient aeration in a single low pressure hollow sheet membrane filtration module.
Brannock, M. W. D., De Wever, H., Wang, Y., and Leslie, G., Computational fluid dynamics simulations of MBRs: Inside submerged versus outside submerged membranes. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.073
Brannock, M. W. D., Wang, Y., and Leslie, G., Evaluation of full-scale membrane bioreactor mixing performance and the effect of membrane configuration. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.016
Brannock, M., Leslie, G., Wang, Y., and Buetehorn, S., Optimising mixing and nutrient removal in membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling and experimental validation. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.11.048
Brannock, M., Wang, Y., and Leslie, G., Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.029
Buetehorn, S., Volmering, D., Vossenkaul, K., Wintgens, T., Wessling, M., and Melin, T., CFD simulation of single- and multi-phase flows through submerged membrane units with irregular fiber arrangement. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.022
Chan, C. C. V., Berube, P. R., and Hall, E. R., Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.032
Cui, Z. F., Chang, S., and Fane, A. G., The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00246-1
Dumont, E., Fayolle, F., and Legrand, J., Flow regimes and wall shear rates determination within a scraped surface heat exchanger. DOI: 10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00056-X
Dumont, E., Fayolle, F., Sobolik, V., and Legrand, J., Wall shear rate in the Taylor-Couette-Poiseuille flow at low axial Reynolds number. DOI: 10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00183-1
Ekambara, K. and Joshi, J. B., Computational fluid dynamics simulations in bubble-column reactors: Laminar and transition regimes. DOI: 10.1021/ie0492606
Fulton, B. and Bérubé, P. R., Optimal module configuration and sparging scenario for a ZW500 submerged hollow fiber membrane system.
Fulton, B. G., Redwood, J., Tourais, M., and Bérubé, P. R., Distribution of surface shear forces and bubble characteristics in full-scale gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.050
Garakani, A. H. K., Mostoufi, N., Sadeghi, F., Hosseinzadeh, M., Fatourechi, H., Sarrafzadeh, M. H., and Mehrnia, M. R., Comparison between different models for rheological characterization of activated sludge.
Itazu, Y. and Nagano, Y., RNG modeling of turbulent heat flux and its application to wall shear flows. DOI: 10.1299/jsmeb.41.657
Judd, S., The MBR Book.
Judd, S., Theoretical and experimental representation of a submerged membrane bio-reactor system. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-2118(01)80232-9
Khalili, A., Mehrnia, M. R., Mostoufi, N., and Sarrafzadeh, M., Flow characteristics in an airlift membrane bioreactor. DOI: 10.2202/1934-2659.1403
Khalili-Garakani, A., Mehrnia, M. R., Mostoufi, N., and Sarrafzadeh, M. H., Analyze and control fouling in an airlift membrane bioreactor: CFD simulation and experimental studies. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.01.036
Kulkarni, A. V., Roy, S. S., and Joshi, J. B., Pressure and flow distribution in pipe and ring spargers: Experimental measurements and CFD simulation. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.03.011
Le-Clech, P., Alvarez-Vazquez, H., Jefferson, B., and Judd, S., Fluid hydrodynamics in submerged and sidestream membrane bioreactors.
Legrand, J., Dumont, E., Comiti, J., and Fayolle, F., Diffusion coefficients of ferricyanide ions in polymeric solutions — comparison of different experimental methods. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00391-6
Liu, W., Jordan, E., Kippax, V., Kang, C. W., Lou, J., Zhang, Q., and Liu, N., Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) to characterize air and water two phase plug flow membrane clean system. DOI: 10.2175/193864709793954853
Liu, N., Zhang, Q., Chin, G., Ong, E., Lou, J., Kang, C., Liu, W., and Jordan, E., Experimental investigation of hydrodynamic behavior in a real membrane bio-reactor unit. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.042
Ndinisa, N. V., Fane, A. G., Wiley, D. E., and Fletcher, D. F., Fouling control in a submerged flat sheet membrane system: Part II—Two-phase flow characterization and CFD simulations. DOI: 10.1080/01496390600633915
Nguyen Cong Duc, E., Levecq, C., Lesjean, B., and Tazi-Pain, A., Modelling the two phase flow in a pilot submerged membrane bioreactor.
Ratkovich, N., Fulton, B., Hunze, M., Berube, P. R., and Nopens, I., Experimental validation of a hydrodynamic CFD model of a hollow fiber MBR using shear intensity measurements. DOI: 10.2175/193864710798217151
Reiss, L. P. and Hanratty, T. J., An experimental study of the unsteady nature of the viscous sublayer. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690090204
Saalbach, J. and Hunze, M., Flow structures in MBR-tanks. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.122
Taha, T. and Cui, Z. F., CFD modelling of gas-sparged ultrafiltration in tubular membranes. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00360-5
Tavoularis, S., Measurement in Fluid Mechanics.
Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., and Stensel, H. D., Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse.
Theodoulou, M., Systems Development Manager.
Verrecht, B., Judd, S., Guglielmi, G., Brepols, C., and Mulder, J. W., An aeration energy model for an immersed membrane bioreactor. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.013
Wang, Y., Brannock, M., and Leslie, G., Membrane bioreactors: overview of the effects of module geometry on mixing energy. DOI: 10.1002/apj.248
Wang, Y., Brannock, M., Cox, S., and Leslie, G., CFD simulations of membrane filtration zone in a submerged hollow fibre membrane bioreactor using a porous media approach. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.008