Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Atomization and Sprays
IF: 1.262 5-Year IF: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Print: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2019029492
pages 19-37


Wei Xie
School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, People's Republic of China
Zongjie Hu
School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, People's Republic of China
Wenbo Zhao
School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, People's Republic of China
Jiachen Zhai
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States of America
Yufeng Wang
Jiangsu Riying Electronics Co., Ltd, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213000, People's Republic of China
Liguang Li
School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, People's Republic of China
Zhijun Wu
School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, People's Republic of China


An open atomization test bench based on high-speed Schlieren technology and a Malvern particle size analyzer was developed to investigate the effects of different injection pressures (0.12 MPa to 0.24 MPa) on spray characteristics of an internal oscillating nozzle, including the spatial distribution of flow rate, oscillation frequency, spray cone angle, spatial distribution of spray particle size, and velocity. A numerical investigation that simultaneously considered the internal flow field and the external spray within the same computational field was performed to reveal the oscillation mechanism. The experimental results indicated that the spray of the internal oscillating nozzle shows a fan shape distribution with small flow in the middle and large distribution on both sides. The flow rate gradually increases with the rising of injection pressure and reaches its maximum at 0.24 MPa when the distance from the nozzle is constant. The oscillating frequency keeps an upward tendency with a maximum growth rate when the injection pressure ascends from 0.15 MPa to 0.18 MPa. The spray cone angle does not change significantly with the increase of the injection pressure, fluctuating at approximately 41.8 degrees. Moreover, a critical injection pressure is obtained, below which the droplet size increases with the rise of the injection pressure and above which the droplet size declines moderately. The numerical investigation revealed that the oscillation phenomenon was generated due to the periodic establishing and vanishing of the pressure gradient within the feedback channels, and the Coanda effect occurred in the main flow passage.


  1. Bobusch, B.C., Woszidlo, R., Bergada, J.M., et al., Experimental Study of the Internal Flow Structures inside a Fluidic Oscillator, Experiments Fluids, vol. 54, no. 6, p. 1559, 2013.

  2. Chen, C.K.,Wang, L., Yang, J.T., et al., Experimental and Computational Analysis of Periodic Flow Structure in Oscillatory Gas Flow Meters, J. Mech., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 137–144, 2006.

  3. DeSalvo, M., Whalen, E., and Glezer, A., High-Lift Enhancement using Fluidic Actuation, 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p. 863, 2010.

  4. Gaertlein, S., Woszidlo, R., Ostermann, F., et al., The Time-Resolved Internal and External Flow Field Properties of a Fluidic Oscillator, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p. 1143, 2014.

  5. Gebert, B.M., Davidson,M.R., and Rudman,M.J., Computed Oscillations of a Confined Submerged Liquid Jet, Appl. Math. Model., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 843–850, 1998.

  6. Guo, B., Langrish, T.A.G., and Fletcher, D.F., An Assessment of Turbulence Models Applied to the Simulation of a Two-Dimensional Submerged Jet, Appl. Math. Model., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 635–653, 2001.

  7. Guyot, D., Paschereit, C.O., and Raghu, S., Active Combustion Control using a Fluidic Oscillator for Asymmetric Fuel Flow Modulation, Int. J. Flow Control, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 155–166, 2009.

  8. Hossain,M.A., Prenter, R., Lundgreen, R.K., et al., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Sweeping Jet Film Cooling, J. Turbomachinery, vol. 140, no. 3, p. 031009, 2018.

  9. Koklu,M., The Effects of Sweeping Jet Actuator Parameters on Flow Separation Control, 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, p. 2485, 2015.

  10. Lawson, N.J., Arruda,M.P., and Davidson,M.R., Control of a Submerged Jet in a Thin Rectangular Cavity, J. Fluids Structures, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1025–1042, 2005.

  11. Lefebvre, A.H. and McDonell, V.G., Atomization and Sprays, CRC Press, pp. 1–13, 2017.

  12. Mansy, H., An Experimental and Numerical Study of Trapped Vortex Pair Fluidic Flowmeter, ASME FED Forum Turbulent Flows, vol. 76, pp. 35–39, 1989.

  13. Maurel, A., Ern, P., Zielinska, B.J.A., et al., Experimental Study of Self-Sustained Oscillations in a Confined Jet, Phys. Rev. E, vol. 54, no. 4, p. 3643, 1996.

  14. Mlkvik,M., Stahle, P., Schuchmann, H.P., et al., Twin-Fluid Atomization of Viscous Liquids: The Effect of Atomizer Construction on Breakup Process, Spray Stability and Droplet Size, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 77, pp. 19–31, 2015.

  15. Ostermann, F., Woszidlo, R., Nayeri, C., et al., Experimental Comparison between the Flow Field of Two Common Fluidic Oscillator Designs, 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p. 0781, 2015.

  16. Sakai, K., Okabayasi, M., and Yasuda, K., The Fluidic Flowmeter—A Gas Flowmeter based on Fluidic Dynamic Oscillation, Flow Measurement Instrument., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 1989.

  17. Santangelo, P.E., Characterization of High-Pressure Water-Mist Sprays: Experimental Analysis of Droplet Size and Dispersion, Experimental Thermal Fluid Sci., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1353–1366, 2010.

  18. Schmidt, H.J., Woszidlo, R., Nayeri, C.N., et al., Separation Control with Fluidic Oscillators in Water, Experiments Fluids, vol. 58, no. 8, p. 106, 2017.

  19. Shakouchi, T., An Experimental Study on the Cavity Type Fluidic Oscillator, Research Reports of the Faculty of Engineering,Mie University, Japan, vol. 6, pp. 1–13, 1981.

  20. Woszidlo, R., Ostermann, F., Nayeri, C.N., et al., The Time-Resolved Natural Flow Field of a Fluidic Oscillator, Experiments Fluids, vol. 56, no. 6, p. 125, 2015.

  21. Woszidlo, R. and Wygnanski, I., Parameters Governing Separation Control with Sweeping Jet Actuators, 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, p. 3172, 2011.

  22. Wright, P.H., The Coanda Meter—A Fluidic Digital Gas Flowmeter, J. Phys. E Sci. Instruments, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 433, 1980.