Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Atomization and Sprays

Impact factor: 1.235

ISSN Print: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v16.i6.70
pages 705-726

IMPINGEMENT OF HIGH-PRESSURE GASOLINE SPRAYS ON ANGLED SURFACES

J. M. Nouri
School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V0HB
Jim H. Whitelaw
Thermofluids Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

A combination of visualization and local measurements of velocity and droplet size characteristics of normal and angled impinging sprays at an injection pressure of 80 bar, chamber pressures of atmospheric and 12 bar, and injection duration of 3.2 ms has shown the formation of a spray moving along the wall after impingement. Angled plates at 80° and 45° produced nonuniform wall sprays, with the difference between maximum and minimum radii from impingement increasing with plate angle. The penetration of the wall spray was less at the higher chamber pressure, and much of the injected fuel appeared to form a liquid film on the surface, although this could not be verified from the images. The velocities of the droplets inside the wall spray showed that its thickness was less at the higher chamber pressure with smaller velocities and larger diameters. The average droplet diameter was smaller than that in the spray prior to impingement for both chamber pressures so that they were better able to follow the induced airflow circulation. The results also showed that the 45° impingement resulted in similar droplets to those of normal impingement. In general, the droplets forming the jet wall spray with both angles were mainly transported from the main spray, with contributions from splashing and reatomization closer to the main spray and from stripping of the liquid film farther downstream, where the wall spray tended to turn upward.