Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
IF: 1.841 5-Year IF: 1.927 SJR: 0.649 SNIP: 0.516 CiteScore™: 1.96

ISSN Print: 1045-4403
ISSN Online: 2162-6502

Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i4.50
pages 319-338

Mechanical Signaling for Bone Modeling and Remodeling

Alexander G. Robling
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University/Purdue University at Indianapolis (IUPUI)
Charles H. Turner
Indiana University

ABSTRACT

Proper development of the skeleton in utero and during growth requires mechanical stimulation. Loading results in adaptive changes in bone that strengthen bone structure. Bone’s adaptive response is regulated by the ability of resident bone cells to perceive and translate mechanical energy into a cascade of structural and biochemical changes within the cells — a process known as mechanotransduction. Mechanotransduction pathways are among the most anabolic in bone, and consequently, there is great interest in elucidating how mechanical loading produces its observed effects, including increased bone formation, reduced bone loss, changes in bone cell differentiation and lifespan, among others. A molecular understanding of these processes is developing, and with it comes a profound new insight into the biology of bone. In this article, we review the nature of the physical stimulus to which bone cells mount an adaptive response, including the identity of the sensor cells, their attributes and physical environment, and putative mechanoreceptors they express. Particular attention is allotted to the focal adhesion and Wnt signaling, in light of their emerging role in bone mechanotransduction. Te cellular mechanisms for increased bone loss during disuse, and reduced bone loss during loading are considered. Finally, we summarize the published data on bone cell accommodation, whereby bone cells stop responding to mechanical signaling events. Collectively, these data highlight the complex yet finely orchestrated process of mechanically regulated bone homeostasis.


Articles with similar content:

Regulatory Controls for Osteoblast Growth and Differentiation: Role of Runx/Cbfa/AML Factors
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.14, 2004, issue 1&2
Sayyed Kaleem Zaidi, Janet L. Stein, Jane B. Lian, Martin Montecino, Andre J. van Wijnen, Amjad Javed, Gary S. Stein, Christopher Lengner
Role of DLX Regulatory Proteins in Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.17, 2007, issue 3
Giovanni Levi, Marie-Christine de Vernejoul, Nadeem Samee
Bi-Directional Signaling: Extracellular Matrix and Integrin Regulation of Breast Tumor Progression
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.23, 2013, issue 2
Suzanne M. Ponik, Scott Gehler, Patricia J. Keely, Kristin M Riching
mTOR, AMPK, and Sirt1: Key Players in Metabolic Stress Management
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.25, 2015, issue 1
Rosa Maria Borzi , Benedetta Tantini, Flavio Flamigni, Stefania D'Adamo, Silvia Cetrullo
A New Perspective for Stem-Cell Mechanobiology: Biomechanical Control of Stem-Cell Behavior and Fate
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.38, 2010, issue 5
Michael Cho, Jennifer Shin, Igor A. Titushkin