ライブラリ登録: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
SJR: 0.468 SNIP: 0.905 CiteScore™: 1.65

ISSN 印刷: 1072-8325
ISSN オンライン: 1940-431X

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2018014113
pages 147-163

DEMONSTRATING THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF UNCONSCIOUS BIAS WITH WAGES-ACADEMIC (WORKSHOP ACTIVITY FOR GENDER EQUITY SIMULATION): SHORT- AND LONG-TERM IMPACT ON FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATORS

Stephanie A Shields
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801, USA
Kaitlin T. McCormick
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801, USA
Elaine C. Dicicco
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801, USA
Matthew J. Zawadzki
University of California, Merced, Merced, California 95340, USA

要約

The long-term effectiveness of WAGES-Academic, a brief intervention that illustrates the cumulative negative effect of minor disadvantages, is reported. University faculty and academic administrators (n = 69) in six sessions at four different universities completed assessments at two time points: a pre/post questionnaire at intervention and open-ended questions in response to email between two and four years after the WAGES session. Pre/post evaluations replicate and extend results obtained in randomized trials. Specifically, after playing WAGES compared to before, participants were more likely to endorse statements that the effect of many small incidents of gender inequity are cumulatively harmful, that case-by-case comparisons of individual applicants are difficult to do objectively, and that masked evaluations are effective in making unbiased hiring decisions. No change occurred in participants' agreement with standardized evaluation forms or accountability of decision-makers as effective. Open-ended questions indicated that WAGES validated many participants' experiences and observations about subtle bias. Long-term follow-up responses were obtained for 23 of 60 individuals with working email addresses. All except two indicated that they remembered participating and recalled inequity as WAGES' focus. Fifty-seven percent indicated that WAGES had led to changes in their behavior, insights into gender biases in their institutions' policies and practices, or policy change at their institutions. We discuss the implications of using WAGES-Academic as a primary or supplemental intervention to educate regarding unconscious bias, (i.e., systematic errors in judgment due to ordinary cognitive processes rather than conscious decision).


Articles with similar content:

FEMMES: A ONE-DAY MENTORSHIP PROGRAM TO ENGAGE 4TH−6TH GRADE GIRLS IN STEM ACTIVITIES
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.17, 2011, issue 4
Heileen Hsu-Kim, Ellen Litkowski, Chi-Fung Jennifer Chen, Allison R. Elia, Katherine Xu, Jessica A. Shuen, Rochelle D. Schwartz-Bloom, Angela Jiang, Aubrey Bonhivert
ADDRESSING GENDER EQUITY IN THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES: REPLICATIONS OF A WORKSHOP DESIGNED TO CHANGE THE VIEWS OF DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.17, 2011, issue 2
Priscilla Lewis, Jean Stockard, Geraldine Richmond, Jessica Greene
THEATER AS A COMMUNITY-BUILDING STRATEGY FOR WOMEN IN ENGINEERING: THEORY AND PRACTICE
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.11, 2005, issue 1
Naomi C. Chesler, Mark A. Chesler
STUDENTS' SCIENCE ATTITUDES IN THE PERFORMANCE-BASED CLASSROOM: DID WE CLOSE THE GENDER GAP?
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.4, 1998, issue 2&3
Jasna Jovanovic, Candice Dreves
INCLUSIVE CIRCLES OF CONVERSATION: IMPLEMENTING AN INNOVATIVE DIVERSITY PROGRAM AMONG ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STAFF
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.26, 2020, issue 4
Chandni Shah, Zachary Elison, Klod Kokini