ライブラリ登録: Guest

GOOD INTENTIONS ARE NOT ENOUGH: ASSESSING A GENDER BIAS LITERACY INTERVENTION FOR POTENTIAL POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE OUTCOMES

巻 26, 発行 6, 2020, pp. 511-540
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020032359
Get accessGet access

要約

Interventions to educate about and reduce gender bias in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), though well-intended, may backfire. Rigorous scientific evaluation is needed to ensure that interventions produce desired effects and avoid unintended harm. We demonstrate a scientific approach to evaluating bias literacy interventions using a randomized controlled longitudinal research design. Specifically, we evaluated the efficacy of an intervention that used entertainment-education via a live theatrical performance depicting women's and men's real-life experiences of gender bias in STEM. We randomly assigned undergraduate students to either attend the performance or watch a control film (A Beautiful Mind). We found evidence that the performance increased participants' ability to take the perspective of women in STEM compared to the control condition, but no evidence that the performance achieved its main goals of increasing awareness of gender bias or motivating action to address gender bias. Instead, participants who attended the performance reported lower self-efficacy to effect change and higher levels of psychological reactance (rejection of the information) compared to those who watched the film. In addition, women in both conditions reported larger increases in identity threat and larger decreases in sense of belonging in STEM over time compared to men, indicating that the intervention did not buffer women against these negative trends. Our results suggest that good intentions are not enough to ensure desired outcomes and that interventions should be rigorously evaluated for both positive and negative effects. Doing so can help identify areas of improvement to maximize benefits and minimize potential harm.

参考
  1. Ahlqvist, S., London, B., & Rosenthal, L. (2013). Unstable identity compatibility: How gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1644-52. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613476048. .

  2. Anderson, A. J., Sanchez, B., Reyna, C., & Rasgado-Flores, H. (2020). "It just weighs in the back of your mind": Microaggressions in science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 26(1), 1-30. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020029197. .

  3. Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2012). When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women's leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), 370-83. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211431968. .

  4. Ashburn-Nardo, L., Morris, K. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2008). The Confronting prejudice responses (CPR) model: Applying CPR in organizations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7(3), 332-42. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2008.34251671. .

  5. Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-66. DOI: 10.1177/014616702237647. .

  6. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105-18. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105. .

  7. Becker, J. C., Zawadzki, M. J., & Shields, S. A. (Eds.). (2014). Confronting and reducing sexism: Creating interventions that work [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4). .

  8. Benschop, Y., Holgersson, C., Van den Brink, M., & Wahl, A. (2015). Future challenges for practices of diversity management in organizations. In R. Bendl, I. Bleijenbergh, E. Henttonen, & A. J. Mills (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of diversity in organizations (pp. 553-574). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199679805.013.24. .

  9. Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1227-74. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000067. .

  10. Biernat, M., Fuegen, K., & Kobrynowicz, D. (2010). Shifting standards and the inference of incompetence: Effects of formal and informal evaluation tools. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 855-68. DOI: 10.1177/0146167210369483. .

  11. Bird, S. R. (2011). Unsettling universities' incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study aproach. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(2), 202-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x. .

  12. Bocher, M., Ulvrova, M., Arnould, M., Coltice, N., Mallard, C., Gerault, M., & Adenis, A. (2020). Drawing everyday sexism in academia: Observations and analysis of a community-based initiative. Advances in Geosciences, 53, 15-31. DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000410316. .

  13. Boncori, I., Sicca, L. M., & Bizjak, D. (2019). Transgender and gender non-conforming people in the work-place: Direct and invisible discrimination. In S. Nachmias, & V. Caven (Eds.), Inequality and organizational practice (pp. 141-160). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11644-6_7. .

  14. Boucher, K. L., & Murphy, M. C. (2017). Why so few? The role of social identity and situational cues in understanding the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. In K. I. Mavor, M. J. Platow, & B. Bizumic (Eds.), Self and social identity in educational contexts (pp. 93-111). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. .

  15. Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446-67. DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555. .

  16. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press. .

  17. Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Manwell, L. B., Byars-Winston, A., Fine, E., Ford, C. E., Forscher, P., Isaac, C., Kaatz, A., Magua, W., Palta, M., & Sheridan, J. (2015). Effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(2), 221-30. DOI: 10.1097/ ACM.0000000000000552. .

  18. Charleston, L. J., Adserias, R. P., Lang, N. M., & Jackson, J. F. L. (2014). Intersectionality and STEM: The role of race and gender in the academic pursuits of African American women in STEM. Journal of Progressive Policy & Practice, 2(3), 273-93. Retrieved from https://caarpweb.org/wp-content/up-loads/2014/12/Charleston-Adserias-Lang-Jackson-2014.pdf. .

  19. Charlesworth, T. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Gender in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, causes, solutions. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228-43. DOI: 10.1523/JNEURO-SCI.0475-18.2019. .

  20. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical environments impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045-60. DOI: 10.1037/a0016239. .

  21. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1-35. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000052. .

  22. Chung, A. H., & Slater, M. D. (2013). Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894-911. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12050. .

  23. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245-64. DOI: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01. .

  24. Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women's success in engineering and computing. American Association of University Women. Accessed 11 May 2020. Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Solving-the-Equation-report-nsa.pdf. .

  25. Cundiff, J. L. (2018). Subtle barriers and bias in STEM: How stereotypes constrain women's STEM participation and career progress. In J. T. Nadler, & M. R. Lowery (Eds.), War on women in the United States: Beliefs, tactics, and the best defenses (pp. 97-116). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. .

  26. Cundiff, J. L., Danube, C., Zawadzki, M., & Shields, S. A. (2018a). Testing an intervention for recognizing and reporting subtle gender bias in promotion and tenure decisions. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 611-36. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2018.1437665. .

  27. Cundiff, J. L., Ryuk, S., & Cech, K. (2018b). Identity safe or threatening? Perceptions of women-targeted professional programs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 745-66. DOI: 10.1177/1368430217740434. .

  28. Cundiff, J. L., & Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender stereotypes influence how people explain gender disparities in the workplace. Sex Roles, 75(3-4), 126-38. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0593-2. .

  29. Cundiff, J. L., Zawadzki, M. J., Danube, C. L., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 703-21. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12087. .

  30. Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231-46. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313. .

  31. Davidson, S. (2016). Gender inequality: Nonbinary transgender people in the workplace. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2016.1236511. .

  32. Davis, M. H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol, E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1625-35. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271183. .

  33. Deemer, E. D., Lin, C., & Soto, C. (2016). Stereotype threat and women's science motivation: Examining the disidentification effect. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(4), 637-50. DOI: 10.1177/1069072715616064. .

  34. Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2013). The origins and effects of corporate diversity programs. In Q. M. Roberson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 253-281). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199736355.013.0015. .

  35. Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail and what works better. Harvard Business Review, 94(7-8), 52-60. Accessed 11 August 2017. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diver-sity-programs-fail. .

  36. Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2017). Are diversity programs merely ceremonial? Evidence-free institutionalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 808-828). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781446280669.n32. .

  37. Dover, T. L., Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2020). Mixed signals: The unintended effects of diversity initiatives. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 152-81. DOI: 10.1111/sipr.12059. .

  38. Dovidio, J. F., Ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T. L., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, J. D., Esses, V. M., Riek, B. M., & Pearson, A. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1537-49. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271177. .

  39. Dresden, B. E., Dresden, A. Y., Ridge, R. D., & Yamawaki, N. (2018). No girls allowed: Women in male-dominated majors experience increased gender harassment and bias. Psychological Reports, 121(3), 459-74. DOI: 10.1177/0033294117730357. .

  40. Drury, B. J., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 637-52. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12083. .

  41. Duguid, M. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2015). Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 343-59. DOI: 10.1037/a0037908. .

  42. Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., & West, K. (2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors' biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3-4), 127-41. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w. .

  43. Eddy, S. L., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020106. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106. .

  44. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-91. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146. .

  45. Ferguson, C., & Ghorayshi, A. (2015). Read this letter from scientists accusing top publisher of sexism. New York: BuzzFeed News. Accessed 20 May 2020. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/ article/catferguson/science-journal-reinforces-dangerous-stereotypes. .

  46. Fries-Britt, S. (2017). It takes more than academic preparation: A nuanced look at Black male success in STEM. Journal of African American Males in Education, 8(1), 6-22. Accessed 1 June 2020. Retrieved from http://journalofafricanamericanmales.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Fries-Britt-2017-Black-Male-High-Achiever-Review-FINAL.pdf. .

  47. Funk, C., & Parker, K. (2018). Women and men in STEM often at odds over workplace equity. Pew Research Center. Accessed 20 May 2020. Retrieved from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/01/09/women-and-men-in-stem-often-at-odds-over-workplace-equity/. .

  48. George, C. E., Castro, E. L., & Rincon, B. (2019). Investigating the origins of STEM intervention programs: An isomorphic analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1645-61. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1458224. .

  49. George-Jackson, C. E., & Rincon, B. (2012). Increasing sustainability of STEM intervention programs through evaluation (Higher Education Brief, vol. 5, nos. 1-2). American Society for Quality. Accessed 22 May 2020. Retrieved from http://rube.asq.org/edu/2012/02/engineering/increasing-sustainability-of-stem-intervention-programs-through-evaluation.pdf. .

  50. Gervais, S., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, K. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 5-17. DOI: 10.1177/0361684310386121. .

  51. Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700-17. DOI: 10.1037/a0026659. .

  52. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-21. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701. .

  53. Grunspan, D. Z., Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Wiggins, B. L., Crowe, A. J., & Goodreau, S. M. (2016). Males under-estimate academic performance of their female peers in undergraduate biology classrooms. PLoS One, 11(2), Article e0148405. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148405. .

  54. Guy, B., & Boards, A. (2019). A seat at the table: Exploring the experiences of underrepresented minority women in STEM graduate programs. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 47(4), 354-65. DOI: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1617383. .

  55. Hagger, M., Cameron, L., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., & Lintunen, T. (Eds.). (2020). The handbook of behavior change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108677318. .

  56. Hall, W., Schmader, T., Aday, A., & Croft, E. (2019). Decoding the dynamics of social identity threat in the workplace: A within-person analysis of women's and men's interactions in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 542-52. DOI: 10.1177/1948550618772582. .

  57. Handley, I. M., Brown, E. R., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Smith, J. L. (2015). Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder. PNAS, 112(43), 13201-6. DOI: 10.1073/ pnas.1510649112. .

  58. Hennes, E. P., Pietri, E. S., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Mason, K. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Bailey, A. H., & Handelsman, J. (2018). Increasing the perceived malleability of gender bias using a modified Video Intervention for Diversity in STEM (VIDS). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 788-809. DOI: 10.1177/1368430218755923. .

  59. Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. Harvard Business Review: Research Report (no. 10094). .

  60. Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34(5), 777-92. DOI: 10.1177/1090198106291963. .

  61. Howard, R. (Director). (2001). A beautiful mind [Film]. Hollywood, CA: Universal Pictures. .

  62. Howell, J. L., Redford, L., Pogge, G., & Ratliff, K. A. (2017). Defensive responding to IAT feedback. Social Cognition, 35(5), 520-62. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2017.35.5.520. .

  63. Iverson, S., & Seher, C. (2014). Using theatre to change attitudes toward lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 11(1), 40-61. DOI: 10.1080/19361653.2014.840765. .

  64. Johnson, D. R., Jasper, D. M., Griffin, S., & Huffman, B. L. (2013). Reading narrative fiction reduces Arab-Muslim prejudice and offers a safe haven from intergroup anxiety. Social Cognition, 31(5), 578-98. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.578. .

  65. Kang, S. K., & Kaplan, S. (2019). Working toward gender diversity and inclusion in medicine: Myths and solutions. The Lancet, 393(10171), 579-86. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33138-6. .

  66. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. (2013). The Matilda effect in science communication: An experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication 35(5), 603-25. DOI: 10.1177/1075547012472684. .

  67. Kossek, E. E., Su, R., & Wu, L. (2017). "Opting out" or "pushed out"? Integrating perspectives on women's career equality for gender inclusion and interventions. Journal of Management, 43(1), 228-54. DOI: 10.1177/0149206316671582. .

  68. LaCosse, J., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Bennett, J. (2016). STEM stereotypic attribution bias among women in an unwelcoming science setting. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 378-97. DOI: 10.1177/0361684316630965. .

  69. Lariviere, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504, 211-3. DOI: 10.1038/504211a. .

  70. Leaper, C., & Starr, C. R. (2019). Helping and hindering undergraduate women's STEM motivation: Experiences with STEM encouragement, STEM-related gender bias, and sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 165-83. DOI: 10.1177/0361684318806302. .

  71. Leslie, L. M. (2019). Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy ofManagementReview, 44(3), 538-63. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2017.0087. .

  72. Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., & Ito, T. A. (2016). Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020110. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020110. .

  73. Liben, L. S., & Coyle, E. F. (2014). Developmental interventions to address the STEM gender gap: Exploring intended and unintended consequences. In L. S. Liben, & R. S. Bigler (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 47. The role of gender in educational contexts and outcomes (pp. 77-115). Elsevier Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.06.001. .

  74. Lindsey, A., King, E., Hebl, M., & Levine, N. (2015). The impact of method, motivation, and empathy on diversity training effectiveness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(3), 605-17. DOI: 10.1007/ s10869-014-9384-3. .

  75. Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1089-103. DOI: 10.1037/a0015703. .

  76. Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O'Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1068-86. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068. .

  77. Malhotra, D., & Liyanage, S. (2005). Long-term effects of peace workshops in protracted conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 908-24. DOI: 10.1177/0022002705281153. .

  78. McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577-605. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612. .

  79. McCormick-Huhn, K., Kim, L. M., & Shields, S. A. (2020). Unconscious bias interventions for business: An initial test of WAGES-Business (Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation) and Google's "re: Work" trainings. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1111/asap.12191. .

  80. Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1678-712. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000022. .

  81. Miller, R. A., Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E. W., & Forester, R. (2020). "It's dude culture": Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000171. .

  82. Miner, K. N., Diaz, I., & Rinn, A. N. (2017). Incivility, psychological distress, and math self-concept among women and students of color in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(3), 211-30. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018506. .

  83. Mitchneck, B., Smith, J., & Latimer, M. (2016). A recipe for change: Creating a more inclusive academy. Science, 352(6282), 148-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad8493. .

  84. Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33-43. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33. .

  85. Morgan, S. E., Movius, L., & Cody, M. J. (2009). The power of narratives: The effect of entertainment television organ donation storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and nondonors. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 135-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01408.x. .

  86. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS, 109(41), 16474-9. DOI: 10.1073/ pnas.1211286109. .

  87. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Molenda, A. K., & Cramer, C. R. (2015). Can evidence impact attitudes? Public reactions to evidence of gender bias in STEM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), 194-209. DOI: 10.1177/0361684314565777. .

  88. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Pietri, E. S., Hennes, E. P., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Roussos, G., & Handelsman, J. (2018). Reducing STEM gender bias with VIDS (video interventions for diversity in STEM). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(2), 236-60. DOI: 10.1037/xap0000144. .

  89. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Sanzari, C., Caluori, N., & Rabasco, H. (2018). Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement. Sex Roles, 79(11-12), 651-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-018-0902-z. .

  90. Moss-Racusin, C. A., van der Toorn, J., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2014). Scientific diversity interventions. Science, 343(6171), 615-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1245936. .

  91. Moyer-Guse, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x. .

  92. Moyer-Guse, E., Jain, P., & Chung, A. H. (2012). Reinforcement or reactance? Examining the effect of an explicit persuasive appeal following an entertainment-education narrative. Journal of Communication, 62(6), 1010-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01680.x. .

  93. Murphy, M. C., & Taylor, V. J. (2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In M. Inzlicht, & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 17-33). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732449.003.0002. .

  94. Murrar, S., & Brauer, M. (2018). Entertainment-education effectively reduces prejudice. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(7), 1053-77. DOI: 10.1177/1368430216682350. .

  95. Murrar, S., & Brauer, M. (2019). Overcoming resistance to change: Using narratives to create more positive intergroup attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 164-9. DOI: 10.1177/0963721418818552. .

  96. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/24994. .

  97. National Science Foundation. (2017a). Table 5-2: Bachelor's degrees awarded, by field and sex: 2006-2016. Accessed 18 May 2020. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data/. .

  98. National Science Foundation. (2017b). Table 9-5: Employed scientists and engineers, by occupation, highest degree level, and sex: 2017. Accessed 18 May 2020. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data/. .

  99. Nature Editorial. (2015). Sexism has no place in science [Editorial]. Nature, 522, 255. DOI: 10.1038/522255a. .

  100. Nelson, T. D. (Ed.). (2016). Part 4: Reducing prejudice. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 387-483). New York, NY: Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203361993. .

  101. Nix, S., Roberts, K. L., & Hughes, R. (2016). Female undergraduate STEM persistence: A focus on the role of living and learning communities. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 22(4), 349-74. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2016016349. .

  102. O'Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. .

  103. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172-209. DOI: 10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2. .

  104. Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574-87. DOI: 10.1037/a0011989. .

  105. Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339-67. DOI: 10.1146/annurev. psych.60.110707.163607. .

  106. Paluck, E. L., Green, S. A., & Green, D. P. (2019). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 129-58. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2018.25. .

  107. Pendry, L. F., Driscoll, D. M., & Field, S. C. (2007). Diversity training: Putting theory into practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 27-50. DOI: 10.1348/096317906X118397. .

  108. Pietri, E. S., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Guha, D., Roussos, G., Brescoll, V. L., & Handelsman, J. (2017). Using video to increase gender bias literacy toward women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 175-96. DOI: 10.1177/0361684316674721. .

  109. Pietri, E. S., Hennes, E. P., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Bailey, A. H., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Handelsman, J. (2019). Addressing unintended consequences of gender diversity interventions on women's sense of belonging in stem. Sex Roles, 80(9-10), 527-47. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-018-0952-2. .

  110. Ramsey, L. R., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2011). Changing stereotypes, changing grades: A longitudinal study of stereotyping during a college math course. Social Psychology of Education, 14(3), 377-87. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-010-9150-y. .

  111. Rattan, A., & Ambady, N. (2014). How "it gets better": Effectively communicating support to targets of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 555-66. DOI: 10.1177/0146167213519480. .

  112. Regner, I., Thinus-Blanc, C., Netter, A., Schmader, T., & Huguet, P. (2019). Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(11), 1171-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0686-3. .

  113. Remedios, J. D., & Snyder, S. H. (2015). How Women of Color detect and respond to multiple forms of prejudice. Sex Roles, 73(9-10), 371-83. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-015-0453-5. .

  114. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2014). How stereotypes impair women's careers in science. PNAS, 111(12), 4403-8. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314788111. .

  115. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119-25. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I. .

  116. Robnett, R. D. (2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65-79. DOI: 10.1177/0361684315596162. .

  117. Rodriguez, S. L., & Blaney, J. M. (2020). "We're the unicorns in STEM": Understanding how academic and social experiences influence sense of belonging for Latina undergraduate students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000176. .

  118. Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., London, B., Lobel, M., & Bazile, C. (2013). In pursuit of the MD: The impact of role models, identity compatibility, and belonging among undergraduate women. Sex Roles, 68(7-8), 464-73. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-012-0257-9. .

  119. Sekaquaptewa, D., Takahashi, K., Malley, J., Herzog, K., & Bliss, S. (2019). An evidence-based faculty recruitment workshop influences departmental hiring practice perceptions among university faculty. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 38(2), 188-210. DOI: 10.1108/EDI-11-2018-0215. .

  120. Seron, C., Silbey, S. S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2016). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178-214. DOI: 10.1177/0730888415618728. .

  121. Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Buchanan, N. T., & Miner, K. N. (2013). Derogation, discrimination, and (dis) satisfaction with jobs in science: A gendered analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 179-91. DOI: 10.1177/0361684312468727. .

  122. Sevo, R., & Chubin, D. E. (2008). Bias literacy: A review of concepts in research on discrimination. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Center for Science & Engineering Capacity. Retrieved from http://www.napequity.org/nape-content/uploads/8-BiasLiteracy.pdf. .

  123. Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls' and women's performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 175-83. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0. .

  124. Sheltzer, J. M., & Smith, J. C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. PNAS, 111(28), 10107-12. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403334111. .

  125. Shen, F., & Han, J. (2014). Effectiveness of entertainment education in communicating health information: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(6), 605-16. DOI: 10.1080/01292986.2014.927895. .

  126. Shields, S. A., Zawadzki, M. J., & Johnson, R. N. (2011). The impact of the workshop activity for gender equity simulation in the academy (WAGES-Academic) in demonstrating cumulative effects of gender bias. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(2), 120-9. DOI: 10.1037/a0022953. .

  127. Shrum, L. J. (Ed.). (2004). The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Psych Press. DOI: 10.4324/9781410609366. .

  128. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. New York, NY: Routledge. .

  129. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x. .

  130. Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56(2), 235-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x. .

  131. Smith, J. L., Handley, I. M., Zale, A. V., Rushing, S., & Potvin, M. A. (2015). Now hiring! Empirically testing a three-step intervention to increase faculty gender diversity in STEM. BioScience, 65(11), 1084-7. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv138. .

  132. Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415-37. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235. .

  133. Stanley, J. (Writer & Director). (2017). The STEM monologues [Theatrical Play]. Rolla, MO: Missouri University of Science and Technology. Script available from DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/MDYBT. .

  134. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 34, pp. 379-440). DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0. .

  135. Stephan, W. G. (1999). A survey for use in evaluating dialogue programs. Retrieved from http://www.ncdd. org/exchange/files/docs/walter_stephan.pdf. .

  136. Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255-70. DOI: 10.1037/a0021385. .

  137. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prej-udices. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199-214. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199. .

  138. Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments about sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 406-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00240.x. .

  139. Szelenyi, K., & Inkelas, K. K. (2011). The role of living-learning programs in women's plans to attend graduate school in STEM fields. Research in Higher Education, 52(4), 349-69. DOI: 10.1007/s11162- 010-9197-9. .

  140. Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., Brown, E. R., Chase, J., & Lee, J. Y. K. (2013). Beyond performance: A motivational experiences model of stereotype threat. Educational Psychology Review, 25(2), 211-43. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-013-9219-1. .

  141. Todd, A. R., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 738-45. DOI: 10.1016/j. jesp.2011.12.011. .

  142. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus 5a change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 842-9. DOI: 10.1177/0146167295218007 .

  143. Tsui, L. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. The Journal of Negro Education, 76(4), 555-81. Accessed 22 May 2020. Retrieved from https://www. jstor.org/stable/40037228. .

  144. Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen G. L. (2007). "I think it, therefore it's true": Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 104(2), 207-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.07.001. .

  145. Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. .

  146. Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 455-72. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.163. .

  147. Vinkenburg, C. J. (2017). Engaging gatekeepers, optimizing decision making, and mitigating bias: Design specifications for systemic diversity interventions. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(2), 212-34. DOI: 10.1177/0021886317703292. .

  148. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82-96. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82. .

  149. Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2015a). Two brief interventions to mitigate a "chilly climate" transform women's experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 468-85. DOI: 10.1037/a0037461. .

  150. Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2015b). Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 523-50. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322. .

  151. Wilkins-Yel, K. G., Simpson, A., & Sparks, P. D. (2019). Persisting despite the odds: Resilience and coping among women in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 25(4), 353-68. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2019026945. .

  152. Williams, J. C., Li, S., Rincon, R., & Finn, P. (2016). Climate control: Gender and racial bias in engineering? Center for Work Life Law and Society of Women Engineers. Accessed 21 Nov 2016. Retrieved from https://worklifelaw.org/publications/Climate-Control-Gender-And-Racial-Bias-In-Engineering. pdf. .

  153. Williams, J. C., Phillips, K., & Hall, E. (2014). Double jeopardy? Gender bias against women of color in science. Center for Work Life Law. Accessed 15 Nov 2016. Retrieved from https://worklifelaw.org/ wp-content/uploads/publications/Double-Jeopardy-Report_v6_full_web-sm.pdf. .

  154. Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., & Schultz, P. W. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and attrition (for some). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 635-46. DOI: 10.1037/a0029120. .

  155. Zawadzki, M. J., Danube, C. L., & Shields, S. A. (2012). How to talk about gender inequity in the work-place: Using WAGES as an experiential learning tool to reduce reactance and promote self-efficacy. Sex Roles, 67(11-12), 605-16. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-012-0181-z. .

  156. Zawadzki, M. J., Shields, S. A., Danube, C. L., & Swim, J. K. (2014). Reducing the endorsement of sexism using experiential learning: The workshop activity for gender equity simulation (WAGES). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 75-92. DOI: 10.1177/0361684313498573. .

によって引用された
  1. Doerr Katherine, Riegle-Crumb Catherine, Russo-Tait Tatiane, Takasaki Kara, Sassler Sharon, Levitte Yael, Making Merit Work at the Entrance to the Engineering Workforce: Examining Women’s Experiences and Variations by Race/Ethnicity, Sex Roles, 85, 7-8, 2021. Crossref

  2. Moors Amy C., Mayott Lindsay, Hadden Benjamin, Serpa Sandro, Bridging the research-practice gap: Development of a theoretically grounded workshop for graduate students aimed at challenging microaggressions in science and engineering, Cogent Social Sciences, 8, 1, 2022. Crossref

近刊の記事

Mitigating Barriers, Scaffolding Success: Institutional Supports for Black Undergraduate Women in Engineering Programs Meseret Hailu, Neelakshi Rajeev Tewari, Brooke Coley Underrepresented Students Pursuing Mathematics-Intensive Degrees: Changes after Transitioning to College Alison Marzocchi What do STEM Clubs do? The Effect of College Club Participation on Career Confidence and Gender Inclusion Guillermo Dominguez Garcia, Jennifer Glass Validating Practices and Messages that Promote Women’s Engineering Classroom Belongingness: An Intersectional Approach Dina Verdin, A Lili Castillo Examining the Role of Institutional Support on International Doctoral Women’s STEM Persistence and Mental Health Aisha Farra, Aashika Anantharaman, Sarah Swanson, Kerrie Wilkins-Yel, Jennifer Bekki, Nedim Yel, Ashley Randall, Bianca Bernstein Searching for safe space: Student veterans’ uneven pathways to STEM careers by race Brittany Hunt, Jae Hoon Lim Does Race, Ethnicity or Gender of the Mentor Affect Whether They Will be a “Good Mentor”? A Qualitative Analysis of Students’ Perceptions Reuben May, Christine Stanley, America Soto-Arzat, Jennifer Ackerman PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND TEAM MEMBER EFFECTIVENESS OF MINORITIZED STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Behzad Beigpourian, Matthew Ohland Perceptions of Department Chair Roles and Responsibilities in Career Progression and Success of Women STEM Faculty Stephanie Jones, Patricia Ryan Pal “Barbed-Wire Boundaries”: Hidden Curriculum, First-Generation and Low-Income Engineering Students, and Internship Acquisition Jerry Yang, Joseph Towles, Sheri Sheppard, Sara Atwood “I Want to Make an Impact”: The Science Identity and Career Goals of Black and Latinx Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars Sylvia Mendez, Kathryn Watson, Kathryn Starkey, Valerie Conley Care Work, Science Brokering, and Career Motivations: How Hispanic/Latinx Young Adults in STEM Express Social Agency during the COVID-19 Pandemic Angela Frederick, Angelica Monarrez, Danielle Morales Bridging the gap: A sequential mixed methods study of trust networks in graduate application, admissions, and enrollment Cynthia Villarreal, Julie Posselt, Theresa Hernandez, Alexander Rudolph
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集 価格及び購読のポリシー Begell House 連絡先 Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain