年間 4 号発行
ISSN 印刷: 1050-6934
ISSN オンライン: 1940-4379
Indexed in
The Effect of Mandibular Flexure on Stress Distribution in the All-on-4 Treated Edentulous Mandible: A Comparative Finite-Element Study Based on Mechanostat Theory
要約
The All-on-4 treatment concept is a felicitous approach for treatment of edentulous mandible. Mandibular flexure plays a decisive role in several restorative failures−for instance, screw loosening, particularly in widely separated implant supports such as those utilized in All-on-4 treatment methods. We investigated the effect of mandibular flexure on stress distribution and likelihood of bone loss or growth in the implanted mandible using two frequently used All-on-4 methods of implantation: parallel and tilted. Three-dimensional finite-element models of mandible and dental implants together with their compartments were developed. Assuming sagittal symmetry for the mandible, only half of the full geometry was considered. In the parallel model, two dental implants were inserted into the mandible perpendicular to the occlusal plane. In the tilted model, the posterior implant was rotated 30° around the buccal-lingual axis. In both models, maximum stress was detected at the neck region of the posterior implant. This maximum stress was greater in the tilted model than in the parallel model. However, since the corresponding strain was considerably lower in the parallel model, according to mechanostat theory several elements in the parallel model were at risk of bone loss. In contrast, the greater strain in the tilted model decreased the likelihood of bone loss. These findings suggest that use of tilted implants in the treatment of edentulous mandible would reduce the probability of bone loss in vulnerable parts of the osseous tissue surrounding dental implants.
-
Li X, Cao Z, Qiu X, Tang Z, Gong L, Wang D. Does matching relation exist between the length and the tilting angle of terminal implants in the all-on-four protocol? Stress distri-butions by 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodon. 2015 Jun 1;7(3):240-8.
-
Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Branemark System MKII implants: a prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jul 1;16(4):537-46.
-
Zampelis A, Rangert B, Heijl L. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007 Jun 1;97(6):S35-43.
-
Bellini CM, Romeo D, Galbusera F, Taschieri S, Raimondi MT, Zampelis A, Francetti L. Comparison of tilted versus nontilted implant-supported prosthetic designs for the res-toration of the edentuous mandible: a biomechanical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jun 1;24(3):511-17.
-
Soto-Penaloza D, Zaragozi-Alonso R, Penarrocha-Dia-go M, Penarrocha-Diago M. The All-on-four treatment concept: systematic review. J Clin Exper Dentistry. 2017 Mar;9(3):e474.
-
Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I. All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: a 7-year clinical and 5-year radiographic retrospective case series with risk assessment for implant failure and marginal bone level. Clin Implant Dentistry Related Res. 2015 Oct;17:e531-41.
-
Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dentistry Related Res. 2005 Jun;7:s88-94.
-
Del Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dentistry Related Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):612-21.
-
Francetti L, Agliardi E, Testori T, Romeo D, Taschieri S, Fabbro MD. Immediate rehabilitation of the mandible with fixed full prosthesis supported by axial and tilted implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Implant Dentistry Related Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):255-63.
-
Khani MM, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Delavarpour S, Naghizadeh S, Avolio A. Dynamic stress analysis of the arterial wall utilizing physiological pressure waveforms. Am J Appl Sci. 2008 Oct; 5(10):1285-90.
-
Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Menini M, Pera F, Mossolov A, Drago C, Pera P. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2011 Jan 1;105(1):5-13.
-
Motallebzadeh H, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Khani MM. Dynamic stress distribution in a model of implanted man-dible: numerical analysis of viscoelastic bone. J Mechan Med Biol. 2015 Aug 28;15(04):1550050.
-
Khani MM, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Aghajani F, Naderi P. Mechanical vulnerability of lower second premolar utilising visco-elastic dynamic stress analysis. Comp Methods Biomechan Biomed Eng. 2009 Oct 1;12(5):553-61.
-
Korabi R, Shemtov-Yona K, Dorogoy A, Rittel D. The failure envelope concept applied to the bone-dental implant system. Sci Rep. 2017 May 17;7(1):2051.
-
Liang R, Guo W, Qiao X, Wen H, Yu M, Tang W, Liu L, Wei Y, Tian W. Biomechanical analysis and comparison of 12 dental implant systems using 3D finite element study. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2015 Sep 10;18(12):1340-8.
-
Naini RB, Nokar S, Borghei H, Alikhasi M. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Aug 1;26(4).
-
Ozan O, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S. Biomechanical comparison of different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths in All-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan 1;33(1).
-
Zarone F, Apicella A, Nicolais L, Aversa R, Sorrentino R. Mandibular flexure and stress build-up in mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointe-grated implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1): 103-14.
-
Azadikhah N, Shahriari S, Parandakh A, Khojasteh A, Khani MM. The effect of mandible viscoelasticity on dynamic stress distribution in osseous tissue adjacent to dental implant. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun. 2017 Dec 18;29(06):1750040.
-
Uzcategui G, Davila E, Cerrolaza M. A simple and efficient methodology to improve design proposals of dental implants-a design case study. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun. 2015 Aug 2;27(04):1550037.
-
Frost HM. From Wolff's law to the Utah paradigm: insights about bone physiology and its clinical applications. Anatomical Record. 2001 Apr 1;262(4):398-419.
-
Frost HM. Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows. Bone Mineral. 1992 Dec 1;19(3):257-71.
-
Dyachenko Denis Yu., Dyachenko Svetlana V., Finite element method in computer simulation for improved patient care in dentistry: A systematic review, Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin, 28, 5, 2021. Crossref
-
Mao Chuanyuan, Yu Weijun, Jin Min, Wang Yingchen, Shang Xiaoqing, Lin Lu, Zeng Xiaoqin, Wang Liqiang, Lu Eryi, Mechanobiologically optimized Ti–35Nb–2Ta–3Zr improves load transduction and enhances bone remodeling in tilted dental implant therapy, Bioactive Materials, 16, 2022. Crossref
-
Mijiritsky Eitan, Shacham Maayan, Meilik Yuval, Dekel-Steinkeller Michal, Clinical Influence of Mandibular Flexure on Oral Rehabilitation: Narrative Review, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 24, 2022. Crossref