ライブラリ登録: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN 印刷: 1050-6934
ISSN オンライン: 1940-4379

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2013010139
pages 105-149

Conservative Treatments, Surgical Treatments, and the KineSpring® Knee Implant System for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Chuan Silvia Li
Global Research Solutions, Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Olufemi R. Ayeni
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sheila Sprague
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; University of Rochester Medical Center, Orthopaedics Department, Rochester, NY
Victoria Truong
Global Research Solutions Inc, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Mohit Bhandari
CLARITY Research Group, McMaster University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Canada and Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Hamilton General Hospital, Canada

要約

Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease with a high global burden, and multiple treatment options are available. In the current review we summarize the results of studies that have evaluated treatments of knee OA, and we compare these results with an implantable load absorber called the KineSpring® Knee Implant System.
Methods: We conducted a literature search of systematic reviews on treatment strategies for knee OA. We pooled results for each treatment in three categories: pain, function, and stiffness. Then we compared this data to that available for the KineSpring System.
Results: Medications and viscosupplementation show promising initial pain relief for knee OA. Aerobic and resistance training, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) showed a reduction in pain scores. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) generally improves pain and function at 6 weeks, but long-term results are lacking. The KineSpring System demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to 24 months, but direct comparative data are lacking.
Conclusions: Evidence for knee OA therapies suggests improved pain, stiffness, and functional outcomes. Additional research is necessary to clearly delineate the advantages of various approaches to guide practice.


Articles with similar content:

Prospective, Multi-Center, Pilot Study to Evaluate Symptom Relief in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) Treated with the KineSpring® Knee Implant for Load Reduction − The SOAR Protocol
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.23, 2013, issue 2-03
Jack Farr, David R. Diduch, C. Benjamin Ma, Elizabeth A. Arendt, Dennis C. Crawford, Chuan Silvia Li
Pulsed Radiofrequency Current in the Treatment of Pain
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.23, 2011, issue 1-4
Karin Sinavsky, Naomi Betesh, Justin Hata, Steve English, Segun Dawodu, Z. David Luo, Daniel Leung, O. Jameson Stokes , Cecil DeSilva, Danielle Perret-Karimi
Effectiveness of Craniocervical Flexion Exercise on Pain, Disability, and Cervical Range of Motion in Patients with Neck Pain
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.32, 2020, issue 1
Anna Christakou, George Georgoudis, Aikaterini Evangelia Matsi, Nafsika Atsidakou
Cost-Effectiveness of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, High Tibial Osteotomy, and KineSpring® Knee Implant System for Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.23, 2013, issue 2-03
Mohit Bhandari, Chuan Silvia Li
Treatment and Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture in the Elderly
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.19, 2007, issue 2
Yoichi Shimada, Hitoshi Kagaya