年間 6 号発行
ISSN 印刷: 2152-5080
ISSN オンライン: 2152-5099
Indexed in
BAYESIAN OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN INVOLVING MULTIPLE SETUPS FOR DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL TESTING
要約
In an experimental design for dynamic structural testing, it is a common practice to obtain data from a structure using multiple setups, with each setup covering a different part of the structure. This is generally due to availability of limited number of sensors with synchronous data acquisition. This paper considers the problem of optimal placement of actuators and sensors with the aim of maximizing the data information in an experimental design with multiple setups so that the structural dynamic behavior can be fully characterized. The uncertainty in the model parameters is computed by a Bayesian statistical framework and expected utility is used to quantify the uncertainty of the set of identified model parameters. The problem of optimal experimental design with multiple setups is formulated as an optimization problem in which the actuators' and sensors' configuration, which maximizes the expected utility, is selected as the optimal one. The proposed approach can be used to compare and evaluate the quality of the parameter estimates that can be achieved with different numbers of setups in an experimental design and a different number of actuators and sensors in each setup. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is illustrated by optimal experimental design for a simple 12-degree-of-freedom (dof) chainlike spring-mass model of a structure and a 37-dof truss structure.
-
Bansal, S., A New Gibbs Sampling based Bayesian Model Updating Approach Using Modal Data from Multiple Setups, Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif, 5(4):361-374, 2015.
-
Boulkaibet, I., Mthembu, L., Marwala, T., Friswell, M., and Adhikari, S., Finite Element Model Updating Using the Shadow Hybrid Monte Carlo Technique, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc., 52:115-132, 2015.
-
Bansal, S. and Cheung, S.H., Stochastic Simulation Algorithm for Robust Reliability Updating of Structural Dynamic Systems based on Incomplete Modal Data, ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst, Part A, 3(4):04017008, 2017.
-
Bansal, S. and Cheung, S.H., On the Evaluation of Multiple Failure Probability Curves in Reliability Analysis with Multiple Performance Functions, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 167:583-594, 2017.
-
Alban, A., Darji, H.A., Imamura, A., and Nakayama, M.K., Efficient Monte Carlo Methods for Estimating Failure Probabilities, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 165:376-394, 2017.
-
Sundar, V.S. and Manohar, C.S., Time Variant Reliability Model Updating in Instrumented Dynamical Systems based on Girsanov's Transformation, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech, 52:32-40,2013.
-
Lindley, D.V., On a Measure of the Information Provided by an Experiment, Ann. Math. Stat., 27(4):986-1005, 1956.
-
Chaloner, K. and Verdinelli, I., Bayesian Experimental Design: A Review, Stat. Sci., 10(3):273-304, 1995.
-
Muller, P., Simulation based Optimal Design, in Handbook of Statistics, D.K. Dey and C.R. Rao, Eds., New York: Elsevier, pp. 509-518, 2005.
-
Clyde, M.A., Experimental Design: A Bayesian Perspective, in International Encyclopia of Social Behavioral Science, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 5075-5081,2001.
-
Ryan, E.G., Drovandi, C.C., McGree, J.M., and Pettitt, A.N., A Review of Modern Computational Algorithms for Bayesian Optimal Design, Int. Stat. Rev, 84(1):128-154,2016.
-
Udwadia, F.E., Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic Systems, J. Eng. Mech, 120(2):368-390, 1994.
-
Heredia-Zavoni, E. and Esteva, L., Optimal Instrumentation of Uncertain Structural Systems Subject to Earthquake Ground Motions, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(4):343-362, 1998.
-
Papadimitriou, C., Optimal Sensor Placement Methodology for Parametric Identification of Structural Systems, J. Sound Vib., 278(4):923-947, 2004.
-
Yuen,K.V. andKuok, S.C., Efficient Bayesian Sensor Placement Algorithm for Structural Identification: A General Approach for Multi-Type Sensory Systems, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn, 44(5):757-774,2015.
-
Beck, J.L., Bayesian System Identification based on Probability Logic, Struct. Control Health Monitoring, 17(7):825-847, 2010.
-
Jaynes, E.T., Where Do We Stand on Maximum Entropy?, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978.
-
Alvin, K.F., Efficient Computation of Eigenvector Sensitivities for Structural Dynamics, AIAA J, 35(11):1760-1766, 1997.
-
Chow, H.M., Lam, H.F., Yin, T., andAu, S.K., Optimal Sensor Configuration of a Typical Transmission Tower for the Purpose of Structural Model Updating, Struct. Control Health Monit., 18(3):305-320, 2011.
-
Ting-Hua, Y., Hong-Nan, L., and Xu-Dong, Z., A Modified Monkey Algorithm for Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring, SmartMater. Struct., 21(10):105033,2012.
-
Hao, S. and Oral, B., Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring Using Discrete Optimization, Smart Mater Struct., 24(12):125034, 2015.
-
Rao, A.R.M. and Ganesh, A., Optimal Placement of Sensors for Structural System Identification and Health Monitoring Using a Hybrid Swarm Intelligence Technique, Smart Mater Struct., 16(6):2658-2672, 2007.
-
Bansal Sahil, Cheung Sai Hung, On the Bayesian sensor placement for two-stage structural model updating and its validation, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 169, 2022. Crossref