ライブラリ登録: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集
Atomization and Sprays
インパクトファクター: 1.262 5年インパクトファクター: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN 印刷: 1044-5110
ISSN オンライン: 1936-2684

巻:
巻 29, 2019 巻 28, 2018 巻 27, 2017 巻 26, 2016 巻 25, 2015 巻 24, 2014 巻 23, 2013 巻 22, 2012 巻 21, 2011 巻 20, 2010 巻 19, 2009 巻 18, 2008 巻 17, 2007 巻 16, 2006 巻 15, 2005 巻 14, 2004 巻 13, 2003 巻 12, 2002 巻 11, 2001 巻 10, 2000 巻 9, 1999 巻 8, 1998 巻 7, 1997 巻 6, 1996 巻 5, 1995 巻 4, 1994 巻 3, 1993 巻 2, 1992 巻 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v19.i9.60
pages 885-903

ASSESSMENT OF ATOMIZATION MODELS FOR DIESEL ENGINE SIMULATIONS

S. Som
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607-7022
Suresh Aggarwal
University of Illinois at Chicago

要約

Liquid fuel injection and atomization have a significant influence on the combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engines. Using x-ray radiography, it is possible to obtain quantitative and time-resolved data in the primary breakup region close to the injector nozzle. However, most previous studies on model validations have employed optical measurements that are not applicable in this dense spray region. In the present study, atomization models, based on Kelvin-Helmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities, are extensively validated using x-ray and optical measurements for non-evaporating sprays, as well as detailed measurements for evaporating sprays. The data include spray penetration, axial velocity, liquid mass distribution, cone angle, Sauter mean diameter, and vapor penetration. Simulations are performed using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code "CONVERGE", which employs an innovative grid generation technique, and state-of-the-art spray models. Postprocessing tools are developed to facilitate a detailed comparison of predictions with x-ray and optical measurements. The effect of rate of injection uncertainties on spray evolution is also quantified. Although the model globally reproduced the experimentally observed trends and the effects of various parameters on atomization and spray characteristics, it underpredicted spray dispersion, especially for non-evaporating sprays, indicating the need for further model development. In addition, the model could not capture the experimental trends in terms of the effects of nozzle orifice geometry on spray development, implying that effects of cavitation and turbulence generated inside the injector need to be included in the model.


Articles with similar content:

MODELING OF n-HEPTANE SPRAYS INJECTED THROUGH MULTI-HOLE TYPE GDI INJECTOR
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.22, 2012, issue 3
Sungwook Park, Sanghoon Lee, Yunjung Oh
LINKING NOZZLE FLOW WITH SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS IN A DIESEL FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.8, 1998, issue 3
Manolis Gavaises, C. Arcoumanis
DIESEL SPRAY CFD SIMULATIONS BASED ON THE Σ-Υ EULERIAN ATOMIZATION MODEL
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.23, 2013, issue 1
E. Baldwin, N. Trask, David P. Schmidt, Jose M. Pastor, Adrian Pandal, Jose M. Garcia-Oliver
SIMULATION OF FLASH BOILING IN PRESSURE SWIRL INJECTORS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.21, 2011, issue 2
Kshitij Neroorkar, R. O. Grover, Jr., David P. Schmidt, Shivasubramanian Gopalakrishnan
MASS DISTRIBUTION STUDIES IN EFFERVESCENT SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.21, 2011, issue 5
Ali Dolatabadi, Hrishikesh Gadgil, B. N. Raghunandan