ライブラリ登録: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集
Atomization and Sprays
インパクトファクター: 1.262 5年インパクトファクター: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN 印刷: 1044-5110
ISSN オンライン: 1936-2684

巻:
巻 29, 2019 巻 28, 2018 巻 27, 2017 巻 26, 2016 巻 25, 2015 巻 24, 2014 巻 23, 2013 巻 22, 2012 巻 21, 2011 巻 20, 2010 巻 19, 2009 巻 18, 2008 巻 17, 2007 巻 16, 2006 巻 15, 2005 巻 14, 2004 巻 13, 2003 巻 12, 2002 巻 11, 2001 巻 10, 2000 巻 9, 1999 巻 8, 1998 巻 7, 1997 巻 6, 1996 巻 5, 1995 巻 4, 1994 巻 3, 1993 巻 2, 1992 巻 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v20.i8.10
pages 653-672

ANALYSIS OF A TWO-FLUID SPRAYER AND ITS USE TO DEVELOP THE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION MOMENTS SPRAY MODEL, PART II: COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS

N. G. Emekwuru
Energy and Multiphysics Research Group, School of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineer- ing, University of Manchester,ManchesterM60 1QD, United Kingdom
A. Paul Watkins
Energy and Multiphysics Research Group, School of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineer- ing, University of Manchester, United Kingdom

要約

This study presents the development of a new spray model that captures the full polydisperse nature of spray flow without using drop size classes. In this model, the size information concerning the spray is obtained by calculating three moments of the drop size distribution function from transport equations and one moment from a Gamma distribution function. The method reduces the need to presume a particular distribution function for the drop sizes and the complexity of the solution scheme. Drop size data obtained from the examination of the structures of a free spray using a laser-diffraction-based drop analyzer were used to further develop the new spray model and determine its ability to accurately predict such sprays. Test results include the axial distributions of the radial-averaged drop sizes and the local drop distribution at axial positions, and indicate that the drop size distribution is dependent on the atomizing air pressure of the injector and the position of the drop from the injector nozzle. At higher pressure cases the distributions were observed to be bimodal. These trends are captured by the computational results and compare well with those from another moments spray model.


Articles with similar content:

ANALYSIS OF A TWO-FLUID SPRAYER AND ITS USE TO DEVELOP THE NUMBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION MOMENTS SPRAY MODEL, PART I: EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.20, 2010, issue 6
N. G. Emekwuru, A. Paul Watkins
ASSESSMENT OF DROPLET BREAKUP MODELS IN HIGH-SPEED CROSS-FLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.27, 2017, issue 1
Debasis Chakraborty, P. Manna, Anand Bhandarkar
THE STOCHASTIC LAGRANGIAN MODEL OF DROP BREAKUP IN THE COMPUTATION OF LIQUID SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.11, 2001, issue 5
Mikhael Gorokhovski
EXPERIMENTS ON AIR-BLAST ATOMIZATION OF VISCOELASTIC LIQUIDS, PART 1: QUIESCENT CONDITIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 2
Martin H. Davy, Larry Li, Donald T. Eadie, Sheldon I. Green, Daniel M. Dressler
AN ENGINEERING MODEL FOR THE FUEL SPRAY FORMATION OF DEFORMING DROPLETS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.14, 2004, issue 4
Goodarz Ahmadi, William Kvasnak, David J. Schmidt