ライブラリ登録: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集
Atomization and Sprays
インパクトファクター: 1.262 5年インパクトファクター: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN 印刷: 1044-5110
ISSN オンライン: 1936-2684

巻:
巻 29, 2019 巻 28, 2018 巻 27, 2017 巻 26, 2016 巻 25, 2015 巻 24, 2014 巻 23, 2013 巻 22, 2012 巻 21, 2011 巻 20, 2010 巻 19, 2009 巻 18, 2008 巻 17, 2007 巻 16, 2006 巻 15, 2005 巻 14, 2004 巻 13, 2003 巻 12, 2002 巻 11, 2001 巻 10, 2000 巻 9, 1999 巻 8, 1998 巻 7, 1997 巻 6, 1996 巻 5, 1995 巻 4, 1994 巻 3, 1993 巻 2, 1992 巻 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v20.i8.40
pages 721-735

VISCOELASTIC AIR-BLAST SPRAYS IN A CROSS-FLOW. PART 2: DROPLET VELOCITIES

Larry Li
Sheldon I. Green
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 3321−2260 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z4, Canada
Martin H. Davy
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2054-6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z4, Canada
Donald T. Eadie
Kelsan Technologies Corporation, 1140 West 15th Street, North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7P 1M9, Canada

要約

To better understand spray coating in field conditions, we have examined the effect of a cross-flow on two different airblast sprays, one comprising water and the other a viscoelastic industrial coating. Using particle image velocimetry, we measured the time-averaged spatial distribution of droplet velocity over a wide range of spray:cross-flow momentum-flux ratios: 134 ≤ qab ≤ 1382. For both sprays, increasing the relative momentum-flux of the cross-flow caused the droplet velocity magnitude to decay more rapidly with streamwise distance. Along the deflecting spray centerline, the decay followed jetlike scaling in the near field but wakelike scaling in the far field. The transverse droplet velocity, meanwhile, showed a local maximum in the main spray body, which was always substantially higher than the cross-flow velocity; normalized values of the local maximum increased with qab, reaching as high as 65%. As for differences between the two sprays, the coating droplets were markedly faster than the water droplets because they had lower drag-momentum ratios and could thus better preserve their initial momentum. For a similar reason, the water droplets were able to more closely track the carrier airflow, approaching the jet/wakelike velocity scaling earlier than did the coating droplets.


Articles with similar content:

VISCOELASTIC AIR-BLAST SPRAYS IN A CROSS-FLOW. PART 1: PENETRATION AND DISPERSION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.20, 2010, issue 8
Martin H. Davy, Larry Li, Donald T. Eadie, Sheldon I. Green
EXPERIMENTS ON AIR-BLAST ATOMIZATION OF VISCOELASTIC LIQUIDS, PART 1: QUIESCENT CONDITIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 2
Martin H. Davy, Larry Li, Donald T. Eadie, Sheldon I. Green, Daniel M. Dressler
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF COALESCENCE AND DROPLET TRAJECTORIES BETWEEN TWO POLYDISPERSE SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.16, 2006, issue 3
M. Valencia-Bejarano, J. J. Nijdam, T. A. G. Langrish
STUDY OF AMBIENT TURBULENCE EFFECTS ON DIESEL SPRAYS IN A FAN-STIRRED VESSEL
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.16, 2006, issue 6
Tamas Jakubik, Malcolm Lawes, Miroslav Jicha, Robert M. Woolley
Regenerative High Temperature Heat Exchangers: Such as Combustion Products/Inert Gas Heat Exchanger
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.20, 1986, issue
L. H. Th. Rietjens