ライブラリ登録: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
インパクトファクター: 1.841 5年インパクトファクター: 1.927 SJR: 0.649 SNIP: 0.516 CiteScore™: 1.96

ISSN 印刷: 1045-4403
ISSN オンライン: 2162-6502

Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2017019077
pages 173-181

ABCB1 Polymorphisms and Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Lu Zhan
Department of Pediatrics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China
Junlan Lian
Department of Pediatrics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China
Haili Jin
Department of Pediatrics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China
Sunyao Wang
Department of Pediatrics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China
Jiajun Ding
Department of Pediatrics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China
Zhengyang Shao
Department of Pediatrics, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China

要約

The association between ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) C3435T and C1236T polymorphisms and the risk for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis of all published studies to determine the association of ABCB1 C3435T and C1236T polymorphisms and pediatric ALL risk. A systematic retrieval of relevant publications from the PubMed and Web of Science databases was performed. Data were calculated and statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 12.0 software. Metaanalysis results showed no significant association between C3435T polymorphism and pediatric ALL risk (TT vs. CC: odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95–1.52; CT vs. CC: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.82–1.23; the dominant model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.89–1.29; the recessive model: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.84–1.62). Similarly, there was no association found for the C1236T polymorphism (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.18, 95% CI= 0.82–1.70; CT vs. CC: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.80–1.45; the dominant model: OR = 1.10, 95% CI= 0.83–1.46; the recessive model: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.61–1.58). Similar results were observed in the subgroup analyses on ethnicity and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The present meta-analysis found no evidence for ABCB1 C3435T and C1236T polymorphisms as risk factors for pediatric ALL.

キーワード: ALL, ABCB1, meta-analysis, polymorphism

Articles with similar content:

Association between HIF1α 1772 C/T Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Systematic Review
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.27, 2017, issue 4
Ting Wang
Association between the Epithelial Cadherin − 160C/A Polymorphism and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.27, 2017, issue 4
Lei Zhang, Jiansong Jiang, Jianfeng Chen, Ningjie Sun, Xiansheng Chen, Gang Hu, Haiming Wu
XRCC1 Arg194Trp and Arg280His Polymorphisms in Bladder Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.23, 2013, issue 4
Guangjun Jiao, Qinghua Yin, Lian Li, Chuan Liu, Yajie Wang, Mei Wang
Association of ERCC1 Polymorphisms with the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.27, 2017, issue 3
Jiansong Jiang, Jianfeng Chen, Ningjie Sun, Gaojian Luo, Xiansheng Chen, Gang Hu, Haiming Wu
Association between Methionine Synthase Reductase A66G Polymorphism and Male Infertility: A Meta-Analysis
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.27, 2017, issue 1
Fan Jin, Xiangli Wu, Lin Zhang, Weihai Xu