Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.133 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Imprimir: 1050-6934
ISSN On-line: 1940-4379

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2019030019
pages 191-196

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Robotic-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

David B. Johnson, Jr.
OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Orthopedic Residency Program, Columbus, OH 43228
Sean A. Sutphen
Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021; Grant Medical Center, 285 East State Street, Suite 500, Columbus, OH 43215
Ray C. Wasielewski
OhioHealth Orthopedic Surgeons, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43215

RESUMO

Much advancement has been made in the treatment of knee arthritis. A special area of interest has been the treatment of medial unicompartmental disease. However, patients with isolated lateral compartment arthritis represent a significant subset of the population. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is performed much less frequently than in the medial compartment and is known to be more technically demanding and less reproducible. Robotic-assisted arthroplasty provides a tool to improve component placement and reproducibility. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively review radiographic and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted lateral UKA. We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients who underwent robotic-assisted lateral UKA by a single surgeon. Indications consisted of isolated lateral compartment arthritis with correctable valgus deformity and an intact anterior cruciate ligament. Eighteen patients met all inclusion criteria, resulting in 20 lateral UKA. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated and we found that robotic assistance during lateral UKA provided accurate and reproducible results. Native alignment of the tibia and femur were well maintained in the coronal and sagittal planes, and no overcorrection occurred. The standard deviation of tibial components was 1.8°, indicating strong accuracy and reproducibility. Operative times were increased, but this did not lead to intraoperative complications or slowed progression of postoperative rehabilitation. Robotic-assisted lateral UKA provides a tool for accurate and reproducible component placement with excellent short-term clinical outcomes.

Referências

  1. Ackroyd CE. Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(7):937-42. .

  2. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(5):862-5. .

  3. Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993(286):143-8. .

  4. McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51(7):844-9. .

  5. Deschamps G, Chol C. Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients' selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(6):648-61. .

  6. Arirachakaran A, Choowit P, Putananon C, Muangsiri S, Kongtharvonskul J. Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) superior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(5):799-806. .

  7. Servien E, Merini A, Lustig S, Neyret P. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: current concepts and future directions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2501-8. .

  8. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. J Biomech. 2000;33(3):279-88. .

  9. Ali AM, Newman SDS, Hooper PA, Davies CM, Cobb JP. The effect of implant position on bone strain following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical model using digital image correlation. Bone Joint Res. 2017;6(8):522-9. .

  10. Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics. 2005;28(9):983-4. .

  11. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Smith G, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(5):622-8. .

  12. Fitz W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized jigs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 1):69-76. .

  13. Sah AP, Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach. Study with an average five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1948-54. .

  14. Victor J, Wong P, Witvrouw E, Sloten JV, Bellemans J. How isometric are the medial patellofemoral, superficial medial collateral, and lateral collateral ligaments of the knee? Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):2028-36. .

  15. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(1):13-7. .

  16. Burton A, Williams S, Brockett CL, Fisher J. In vitro comparison of fixed- and mobile meniscal-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties: effect of design, kinematics, and condylar liftoff. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8):1452-9. .

  17. Edmiston TA, Manista GC, Courtney PM, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR. Clinical outcomes and survivorship of lateral unicompartmental knee arthro-plasty: does surgical approach matter? J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(2):362-5. .

  18. Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(12):1539-48. .

  19. Gunther TV, Murray DW, Miller R, Wallace DA, Carr AJ, O'Connor JJ, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee. 1996;3(1-2):33-9. .

  20. Kim KT, Lee S, Kim J, Kim JW, Kang MS. Clinical results of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Minimum 2-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8(4):386-92. .

  21. Citak M, Cross MB, Gehrke T, Dersch K, Kendoff D. Modes of failure and revision of failed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. Knee. 2015;22(4):338-40. .

  22. Plate JF, Mofidi A, Mannava S, Smith BP, Lang JE, Poehling GG, Conditt MA, Jinnah RH. Achieving accurate ligament balancing using robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:837167. .

  23. Roche M, O'Loughlin PF, Kendoff D, Musahl V, Pearle AD. Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: preoperative planning and surgical technique. Am J Orthop. 2009;38(2 Suppl):10-5. .

  24. Dunbar NJ, Roche MW, Park BH, Branch SH, Conditt MA, Banks SA. Accuracy of dynamic tactile-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(5):803-8. .

  25. Coon TM. Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop. 2009;38(2 Suppl):7-9. .

  26. Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, MacLean A, Rowe P, Blyth M. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(8):627-35. .

  27. Thein R, Khamaisy S, Zuiderbaan HA, Nawabi DH, Pearle AD. Lateral robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014;22(4):223-8. .

  28. Berger RA, Kusuma SK, Sanders SA, Thill ES, Sporer SM. The feasibility and perioperative complications of outpatient knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(6):1443-9. .