Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology
Fator do impacto: 1.352 FI de cinco anos: 3.347 SJR: 1.022 SNIP: 0.55 CiteScore™: 2.19

ISSN Imprimir: 1040-8401
ISSN On-line: 2162-6472

Volumes:
Volume 39, 2019 Volume 38, 2018 Volume 37, 2017 Volume 36, 2016 Volume 35, 2015 Volume 34, 2014 Volume 33, 2013 Volume 32, 2012 Volume 31, 2011 Volume 30, 2010 Volume 29, 2009 Volume 28, 2008 Volume 27, 2007 Volume 26, 2006 Volume 25, 2005 Volume 24, 2004 Volume 23, 2003 Volume 22, 2002 Volume 21, 2001 Volume 20, 2000 Volume 19, 1999 Volume 18, 1998 Volume 17, 1997 Volume 16, 1996 Volume 15, 1995 Volume 14, 1994

Critical Reviews™ in Immunology

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v23.i4.40
16 pages

Is an Improved Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine Necessary or Feasible?

Gregory J. Atkins
Virus Group, Moyne Institute, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
S. Louise Cosby
Department of Microbiology, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK

RESUMO

The measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine has been very effective in the elimination of disease and has high biosafety. However, it has been associated with several adverse effects and has recently caused controversy with regard to its possible association with inflammatory bowel disease and autism. This has been postulated to be a property of the measles component of the vaccine, and a "new variant" autism has recently been described and suggested to be associated with vaccine virus. Although one study has reported the presence of measles RNA in inflammatory bowel disease associated with autism, this has not been independently confirmed. This and most of the other demonstrated or perceived adverse effects of the MMR vaccine could theoretically be ascribed to its composition as a mixture of three live replicating viruses, one of which (measles) can induce immunosuppression, although this hypothesis is speculative. It may nonetheless be desirable to improve the biosafety of the MMR vaccine by the development of a nonreplicating vaccine that will stimulate efficient immunity and protection. DNA vaccines for measles, mumps, and rubella viruses have been constructed and tested in animal models but are poorly immunogenic. Several other prototype candidate vaccines are possible, including those based on the rubella virus component of the vaccine as a vector.


Articles with similar content:

CD1d-Mediated Antigen Presentation to Natural Killer T (NKT) Cells
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.23, 2003, issue 5-6
Tonya J. Roberts, Venkataraman Sriram, Yinling Lin, Sungyoo Cho, Randy R. Brutkiewicz, Yu Kyeong Hwang
Immunotherapeutic Treatment of Autoimmune Diabetes
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.33, 2013, issue 3
Jae Hyeon Kim, Hun Sik Kim, Sang-Man Jin, Myung-Shik Lee, Kyoung-Ah Kim
Antigen Processing/Presenting and Oncogenesis
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.8, 1997, issue 4
Alexander M. Abdelnoor
Staphylococcal Superantigen Super-Domains in Immune Evasion
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.30, 2010, issue 2
John D. Fraser, Fiona Clow, Ries Langley, Nicola Jackson, Deepa Patel
The Route to HPV-Associated Neoplastic Transformation: A Review of the Literature
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.26, 2016, issue 1
Nedime Serakinci, Pinar Tulay