Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Journal of Porous Media
Fator do impacto: 1.752 FI de cinco anos: 1.487 SJR: 0.43 SNIP: 0.762 CiteScore™: 2.3

ISSN Imprimir: 1091-028X
ISSN On-line: 1934-0508

Volumes:
Volume 24, 2021 Volume 23, 2020 Volume 22, 2019 Volume 21, 2018 Volume 20, 2017 Volume 19, 2016 Volume 18, 2015 Volume 17, 2014 Volume 16, 2013 Volume 15, 2012 Volume 14, 2011 Volume 13, 2010 Volume 12, 2009 Volume 11, 2008 Volume 10, 2007 Volume 9, 2006 Volume 8, 2005 Volume 7, 2004 Volume 6, 2003 Volume 5, 2002 Volume 4, 2001 Volume 3, 2000 Volume 2, 1999 Volume 1, 1998

Journal of Porous Media

DOI: 10.1615/JPorMedia.v14.i10.40
pages 883-892

ADEQUACY OF FINITE ELEMENT MODELS TO SIMULATE ADVECTIVE-DISPERSIVE TRANSPORT COUPLED WITH INTRA-PARTICLE DIFFUSION

Md. Akram Hossain
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Richland, Washington 99354

RESUMO

Advective-dispersive transport coupled with intra-particle diffusion is encountered in both engineered and natural systems. Finite difference models (FDMs) and models based on the method of orthogonal collocation (MOC) are generally employed to simulate such transport. The FDM and the MOC, however, may have oscillatory results. The objective of this paper is to explore the relative accuracy of finite element models (FEMs) to simulate the advective-dispersive transport coupled with intra-particle diffusion for a range of adsorbents. Four FEMs that employ linear basis functions for the solution were considered. The FEMs explored are the Galerkin FEM (GFEM), the Petrov-Galerkin FEM (PGFEM), the Crank-Nicolson-Galerkin FEM (CNGFEM), and the Crank-Nicolson-Petrov-Galerkin FEM (CNPGFEM). The model predictions were compared with experimental data obtained from the literature. The model predictions were generally found to be in good agreement with the experimental data. The models were, in general, stable. It was found that the predictions by the different models were virtually the same. The CNGFEM, however, can be considered preferable over the other models for its ability to provide results of higher-order temporal accuracy.


Articles with similar content:

Modeling of Viscoelastic Behavior of Ballistic Fabrics at Low and High Strain Rates
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol.7, 2009, issue 4
N. V. David, Xin-Lin Gao, J. Q. Zheng
A PRIORI ERROR ANALYSIS OF STOCHASTIC GALERKIN PROJECTION SCHEMES FOR RANDOMLY PARAMETRIZED ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.6, 2016, issue 4
Christophe Audouze , Prasanth B. Nair
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MODELING AND NUMERICAL UNCERTAINTIES IN LARGE EDDY SIMULATION USING UPWIND-BIASED NUMERICAL SCHEMES
TSFP DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.5, 2007, issue
Martin Freitag, Johannes Janicka, Markus Klein
ON FLUID PRESSURIZATION IN A COMPRESSIBLE POROUS MEDIA: A CORRECTION TO THE CURRENT THEORETICAL MODELS
Journal of Porous Media, Vol.22, 2019, issue 11
Rungun Nathan, Qiuyun Wang, Qianhong Wu
ANALYSIS OF SUBGRID SCALES AND SUBGRID SCALE MODELING FOR SHOCK-BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTION
Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena -1 First International Symposium, Vol.0, 1999, issue
Leonhard Kleiser, N. A. Adams , Steffen Stolz