Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Imprimir: 0278-940X
ISSN On-line: 1943-619X

Volumes:
Volume 47, 2019 Volume 46, 2018 Volume 45, 2017 Volume 44, 2016 Volume 43, 2015 Volume 42, 2014 Volume 41, 2013 Volume 40, 2012 Volume 39, 2011 Volume 38, 2010 Volume 37, 2009 Volume 36, 2008 Volume 35, 2007 Volume 34, 2006 Volume 33, 2005 Volume 32, 2004 Volume 31, 2003 Volume 30, 2002 Volume 29, 2001 Volume 28, 2000 Volume 27, 1999 Volume 26, 1998 Volume 25, 1997 Volume 24, 1996 Volume 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2018027003
pages 369-397

A Review of Recent Advances in Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Aneurysms

Akshat M. Pai
Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Michelle Kameda-Smith
Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Brian van Adel
Department of Surgery, Division of Adult Neurology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

RESUMO

Despite the advances in neuro-interventional techniques and expertise to treat intracranial aneurysms (IAs), there remains a subset of IAs that are considered to be a significant treatment challenge. Working closely with the neuro-interventional community, bioengineers have harnessed their knowledge of anatomy, physiology, biophysics, and new materials to develop novel therapeutic adjuncts for the successful endovascular treatment of simple and complex IAs. This review describes the biological challenges, the landscape of neuro-interventional management of IAs, and the factors pertinent to which therapeutic modality is recommended. Finally, recent technological advances that have emerged over the last decade are discussed, taking the reader through the devices' objectives, utility, and safety profiles. The goal of this review is to (i) provide physicians treating IAs with the pertinent information to facilitate evidence-based clinical decision thereby minimizing morbidity and mortality and (ii) facilitate professionals in the biomedical engineering field with the clinical background and summarize current endovascular IA treatment options available, with the intent to inspire future IA device development and innovation.


Articles with similar content:

Establishing Early Functional Perfusion and Structure in Tissue Engineered Cardiac Constructs
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.43, 2015, issue 5-6
Bo Wang, Bryn Brazile, Andrew Claude, Jianjun Guan, Yi Hong, Ge Zhang, J. Ryan Butler, Sourav S. Patnaik, Jun Liao
State of the Art and Future Challenges in Neural Engineering: Strategies for Nervous System Repair Foreword / Editors' Commentary (Volume 2)
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.39, 2011, issue 2
D. Kacy Cullen, Bryan J. Pfister
Spinal Manipulative Therapy: Translating from Research to Clinical Practice
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.20, 2008, issue 1
Joshua A. Cleland, Paul Glynn, Cesar Fernandez-de-las-Penas
Drug-Eluting Implants for Osteomyelitis
Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, Vol.24, 2007, issue 6
Someswar Datta, Biswanath Sa, Chidambaram Soundrapandian
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Performance of Medical Implants: A Review
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.20, 2010, issue 3
Adrian R. M. Upton, Markad V. Kamath, Anton Lodder, David Armstrong