Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

Publicou 6 edições por ano

ISSN Imprimir: 2152-5080

ISSN On-line: 2152-5099

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.7 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.9 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.5 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.0007 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.5 SJR: 0.584 SNIP: 0.676 CiteScore™:: 3 H-Index: 25

Indexed in

RECONSTRUCTION OF DOMAIN BOUNDARY AND CONDUCTIVITY IN ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY USING THE APPROXIMATION ERROR APPROACH

Volume 1, Edição 3, 2011, pp. 203-222
DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.v1.i3.20
Get accessDownload

RESUMO

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a highly unstable problem with respect to measurement and modeling errors. With clinical measurements, knowledge about the body shape is usually uncertain. Since the use of an incorrect model domain in the measurement model is bound to lead to severe estimation errors, one possibility is to estimate both the conductivity and parametrization of the domain boundary. This could in principle be carried out using the Bayesian inversion paradigm and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, but such an approach would lead in clinical situation to an impractical solution because of the excessive computational complexity. In this paper, we adapt the so-called approximation error approach for approximate recovery of the domain boundary and the conductivity. In the approximation error approach, the modeling error caused by an inaccurately known boundary is treated as an auxiliary noise process in the measurement model and sample statistics for the noise process are estimated based on the prior models of the conductivity and boundary shape. Using the approximation error model, we reconstruct the conductivity and a low rank approximation for the realization of the modeling error, and then recover an approximation for the domain boundary using the joint distribution of the modeling error and the boundary parametrization. We also compute approximate spread estimates for the reconstructed boundary. We evaluate the approach with simulated examples of thorax imaging and also with experimental data from a laboratory setting. The reconstructed boundaries and posterior uncertainty are feasible; in particular, the actual domain boundaries are essentially within the posterior spread estimates.

CITADO POR
  1. Orlande Helcio R. B., Dulikravich George S., Neumayer Markus, Watzenig Daniel, Colaço Marcelo J., Accelerated Bayesian Inference for the Estimation of Spatially Varying Heat Flux in a Heat Conduction Problem, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 65, 1, 2014. Crossref

  2. Dardé Jérémi, Hyvönen Nuutti, Seppänen Aku, Staboulis Stratos, Simultaneous recovery of admittivity and body shape in electrical impedance tomography: an experimental evaluation, Inverse Problems, 29, 8, 2013. Crossref

  3. Kolehmainen Ville, Lassas Matti, Ola Petri, Siltanen Samuli, Recovering boundary shape and conductivity in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems & Imaging, 7, 1, 2013. Crossref

  4. Muller P A, Isaacson D, Newell J C, Saulnier G J, Calderón’s method on an elliptical domain, Physiological Measurement, 34, 6, 2013. Crossref

  5. Dardé J., Hyvönen N., Seppänen A., Staboulis S., Simultaneous Reconstruction of Outer Boundary Shape and Admittivity Distribution in Electrical Impedance Tomography, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 6, 1, 2013. Crossref

  6. Lähivaara Timo, Ward Nicholas F Dudley, Huttunen Tomi, Koponen Janne, Kaipio Jari P, Estimation of aquifer dimensions from passive seismic signals with approximate wave propagation models, Inverse Problems, 30, 1, 2014. Crossref

  7. Calvetti Daniela, Ernst Oliver, Somersalo Erkki, Dynamic updating of numerical model discrepancy using sequential sampling, Inverse Problems, 30, 11, 2014. Crossref

  8. Nissinen Antti, Lehikoinen Anssi, Mononen Mika, Lähteenmäki Seppo, Vauhkonen Marko, Estimation of the bubble size and bubble loading in a flotation froth using electrical resistance tomography, Minerals Engineering, 69, 2014. Crossref

  9. Lei J., Liu W.Y., Liu S., Wang X.Y., Dynamic imaging method using the low n-rank tensor for electrical capacitance tomography, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 41, 2015. Crossref

  10. Leinonen Matti, Hakula Harri, Hyvönen Nuutti, Application of stochastic Galerkin FEM to the complete electrode model of electrical impedance tomography, Journal of Computational Physics, 269, 2014. Crossref

  11. Lähivaara Timo, Dudley Ward Nicholas F, Huttunen Tomi, Kaipio Jari P, Niinimäki Kati, Estimating pipeline location using ground-penetrating radar data in the presence of model uncertainties, Inverse Problems, 30, 11, 2014. Crossref

  12. Crabb M G, Davidson J L, Little R, Wright P, Morgan A R, Miller C A, Naish J H, Parker G J M, Kikinis R, McCann H, Lionheart W R B, Mutual information as a measure of image quality for 3D dynamic lung imaging with EIT, Physiological Measurement, 35, 5, 2014. Crossref

  13. Lähivaara T., Dudley Ward N. F., Huttunen T., Rawlinson Z., Kaipio J. P., Estimation of aquifer dimensions from passive seismic signals in the presence of material and source uncertainties, Geophysical Journal International, 200, 3, 2015. Crossref

  14. liu Dong, Kolehmainen Ville, Siltanen Samuli, Laukkanen Anne-maria, Seppänen Aku, Estimation of conductivity changes in a region of interest with electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems & Imaging, 9, 1, 2015. Crossref

  15. Nissinen A, Kaipio J P, Vauhkonen M, Kolehmainen V, Contrast enhancement in EIT imaging of the brain, Physiological Measurement, 37, 1, 2016. Crossref

  16. Koponen Janne, Huttunen Tomi, Tarvainen Tanja, Kaipio Jari, Bayesian approximation error approach in full-wave ultrasound tomography, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 61, 10, 2014. Crossref

  17. Liu Dong, Kolehmainen Ville, Siltanen Samuli, Seppänen Aku, A nonlinear approach to difference imaging in EIT; assessment of the robustness in the presence of modelling errors, Inverse Problems, 31, 3, 2015. Crossref

  18. Ren Shangjie, Dong Feng, Interface and permittivity simultaneous reconstruction in electrical capacitance tomography based on boundary and finite-elements coupling method, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374, 2070, 2016. Crossref

  19. Manzoni A., Pagani S., Lassila T., Accurate Solution of Bayesian Inverse Uncertainty Quantification Problems Combining Reduced Basis Methods and Reduction Error Models, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 4, 1, 2016. Crossref

  20. Hyvönen N., Kaarnioja V., Mustonen L., Staboulis S., Polynomial Collocation for Handling an Inaccurately Known Measurement Configuration in Electrical Impedance Tomography, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 77, 1, 2017. Crossref

  21. Vergara Samuel, Sbarbaro Daniel, Johansen T A, Accurate position estimation methods based on electrical impedance tomography measurements, Measurement Science and Technology, 28, 8, 2017. Crossref

  22. Hyvönen N, Majander H, Staboulis S, Compensation for geometric modeling errors by positioning of electrodes in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems, 33, 3, 2017. Crossref

  23. Hyvönen Nuutti, Mustonen Lauri, Smoothened Complete Electrode Model, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 77, 6, 2017. Crossref

  24. Orlande Helcio R. B., Fudym Olivier, Thermophysical Properties Measurement and Identification, in Handbook of Thermal Science and Engineering, 2017. Crossref

  25. Talebi Moghaddam Sina, Hadwin Paul J., Daun Kyle J., Soot aggregate sizing through multiangle elastic light scattering: Influence of model error, Journal of Aerosol Science, 111, 2017. Crossref

  26. Hyvönen Nuutti, Mustonen Lauri, Thermal Tomography with Unknown Boundary, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 40, 3, 2018. Crossref

  27. Orlande Helcio R. B., Fudym Olivier, Thermophysical Properties Measurement and Identification, in Handbook of Thermal Science and Engineering, 2018. Crossref

  28. Nicholson Ruanui, Petra Noémi, Kaipio Jari P, Estimation of the Robin coefficient field in a Poisson problem with uncertain conductivity field, Inverse Problems, 34, 11, 2018. Crossref

  29. Castello Daniel A., Kaipio Jari P., Modeling errors due to Timoshenko approximation in damage identification, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 120, 9, 2019. Crossref

  30. Candiani Valentina, Hannukainen Antti, Hyvönen Nuutti, Computational Framework for Applying Electrical Impedance Tomography to Head Imaging, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 41, 5, 2019. Crossref

  31. Kaipio J P, Huttunen T, Luostari T, Lähivaara T, Monk P B, A Bayesian approach to improving the Born approximation for inverse scattering with high-contrast materials, Inverse Problems, 35, 8, 2019. Crossref

  32. Smyl Danny, Liu Dong, Invisibility and indistinguishability in structural damage tomography, Measurement Science and Technology, 31, 2, 2020. Crossref

  33. Talebi-Moghaddam S., Bauer F.J., Huber F.J.T., Will S., Daun K.J., Inferring soot morphology through multi-angle light scattering using an artificial neural network, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 251, 2020. Crossref

  34. Silva Gabriel L.S., Castello Daniel A., Borges Lavinia, Kaipio Jari P., Damage identification in plates under uncertain boundary conditions, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 144, 2020. Crossref

  35. Koulouri Alexandra, Rimpiläinen Ville, Simultaneous Skull Conductivity and Focal Source Imaging from EEG Recordings with the Help of Bayesian Uncertainty Modelling, in 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, 80, 2021. Crossref

  36. Calvetti Daniela, Cosmo Anna, Perotto Simona, Somersalo Erkki, Bayesian Mesh Adaptation for Estimating Distributed Parameters, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 42, 6, 2020. Crossref

  37. Riis Nicolai André Brogaard, Dong Yiqiu, Hansen Per Christian, Computed Tomography Reconstruction with Uncertain View Angles by Iteratively Updated Model Discrepancy, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 63, 2, 2021. Crossref

  38. Silva Gabriel L.S., Castello Daniel A., Kaipio Jari P., Damage identification under uncertain mass density distributions, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 376, 2021. Crossref

  39. Nissinen A., Sbarbaro D., Heikkinen L.M., Vauhkonen M., Reduced forward models in electrical impedance tomography with probe geometry, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 22, 8, 2014. Crossref

  40. Sun Xiang, Lee Eunjung, Choi Jung-Il, Quantification of measurement error effects on conductivity reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 28, 12, 2020. Crossref

  41. Pontes P. C., Costa Junior J. M., Naveira-Cotta C. P., Tiwari M. K., Approximation error model (AEM) approach with hybrid methods in the forward-inverse analysis of the transesterification reaction in 3D-microreactors, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 29, 11, 2021. Crossref

  42. Candiani V, Hyvönen N, Kaipio J P, Kolehmainen V, Approximation error method for imaging the human head by electrical impedance tomography* , Inverse Problems, 37, 12, 2021. Crossref

  43. Toivanen Jussi, Hänninen Asko, Savolainen Tuomo, Forss Nina, Kolehmainen Ville, Monitoring hemorrhagic strokes using EIT, in Bioimpedance and Spectroscopy, 2021. Crossref

  44. Agnelli Juan P., Kolehmainen Ville, Lassas Matti J., Ola Petri, Siltanen Samuli, Simultaneous Reconstruction of Conductivity, Boundary Shape, and Contact Impedances in Electrical Impedance Tomography, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 14, 4, 2021. Crossref

  45. Brazey Benoit, Haddab Yassine, Zemiti Nabil, Robust imaging using electrical impedance tomography: review of current tools, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478, 2258, 2022. Crossref

  46. Capistrán Marcos A., Christen J. Andrés, Daza-Torres María L., Flores-Arguedas Hugo, Montesinos-López J. Cricelio, Error Control of the Numerical Posterior with Bayes Factors in Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification, Bayesian Analysis, 17, 2, 2022. Crossref

  47. Bhondayi C., Flotation Froth Phase Bubble Size Measurement, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 43, 2, 2022. Crossref

  48. Brogaard Riis Nicolai André, Dong Yiqiu, Hansen Per Christian, Computed tomography with view angle estimation using uncertainty quantification, Inverse Problems, 37, 6, 2021. Crossref

  49. Dardé J., Hyvönen N., Kuutela T., Valkonen T., Contact Adapting Electrode Model for Electrical Impedance Tomography, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 82, 2, 2022. Crossref

  50. Martins Thiago de Castro, Sato André Kubagawa, Moura Fernando Silva de, Camargo Erick Dario León Bueno de, Silva Olavo Luppi, Santos Talles Batista Rattis, Zhao Zhanqi, Möeller Knut, Amato Marcelo Brito Passos, Mueller Jennifer L., Lima Raul Gonzalez, Tsuzuki Marcos de Sales Guerra, A review of electrical impedance tomography in lung applications: Theory and algorithms for absolute images, Annual Reviews in Control, 48, 2019. Crossref

Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa Políticas de preços e assinaturas Begell House Contato Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain