International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Publicou 6 edições por ano
ISSN Imprimir: 2152-5080
ISSN On-line: 2152-5099
IF:
1.7
5-Year IF:
1.9
Immediacy Index:
0.5
Eigenfactor:
0.0007
JCI:
0.5
SJR:
0.584
SNIP:
0.676
CiteScore™::
3
H-Index:
25
Indexed in
UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC PROPOSAL EVALUATIONS
Volume 6,
Edição 2, 2016,
pp. 167-173
DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2016016198
RESUMO
Peer review is an integral part of safeguarding the fairness of scientific proposal evaluations, but it is also subject to uncertainty, such as reviewer's bias and potential discussion under the table, termed "DaZhaoHu" in Chinese. In this paper, we present a mathematical framework to model the peer review process. Through sensitivity analysis, we numerically demonstrate that the number of proposals has greater impact on overall fairness.
642 Visualizações do artigo
34 downloads de artigos
Métricas
Artigos com conteúdo semelhante:
Última edição
MODEL ERROR ESTIMATION USING PEARSON SYSTEM WITH APPLICATION TO NONLINEAR WAVES IN COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS
DECISION THEORETIC BOOTSTRAPPING
UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES USING KRIGING
STOCHASTIC GALERKIN METHOD AND PORT-HAMILTONIAN FORM FOR LINEAR FIRST-ORDER ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Próximos artigos
EXTREME LEARNING MACHINES FOR VARIANCE-BASED GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Application of global sensitivity analysis for identification of probabilistic design spaces
SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF A MULTI-PHYSICS LONG-TERM CLOGGING MODEL FOR STEAM GENERATORS
Stochastic Galerkin method and port-Hamiltonian form for linear first-order ordinary differential equations
Analysis of the Challenges in Developing Sample-Based Multi-fidelity Estimators for Non-deterministic Models