Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Multiphase Science and Technology
SJR: 0.153 SNIP: 0.222 CiteScore™: 0.26

ISSN Imprimir: 0276-1459
ISSN On-line: 1943-6181

Multiphase Science and Technology

DOI: 10.1615/MultScienTechn.v6.i1-4.290
pages 577-590

COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.1: FAUCET FLOW

H. Qin
Concentration, Heat and Momentum Ltd.(CHAM), Bukey House, 40 High Street, Wimbledon Village, London, SW11 5AU, England

RESUMO

Predictions obtained by five different computer codes for Numerical Benchmark Test No. 2.1 on faucet flow (V. H. Ransom, Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol. 3, pp.465−467, 1987) are reported. Though the differences between the computations performed with the four participating computer codes were not great, the problem underlines the well-known fact that numerical solution procedures which employ non-adaptive grids have difficulty in adequately simulating the motions of discontinuities.


Articles with similar content:

COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.2: OSCILLATING MANOMETER
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
Liu Jun, Dudley Brian Spalding
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.3: EXPULSION OF STEAM BY SUB-COOLED WATER
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
K. Taylor, Dudley Brian Spalding
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.4: ONE-DIMENSIONAL SEDIMENTATION
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
M. C. Walsh, Dudley Brian Spalding
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 3.1: IDEALISED TEE-JUNCTION
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
F. Villasenor, Dudley Brian Spalding
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.6: SHOCK-TUBE
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
D. Radosavjevic