Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
SJR: 0.121 SNIP: 0.228 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Imprimir: 0896-2960
ISSN On-line: 2162-6553

Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v19.i2.20
pages 97-113

Treatment and Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture in the Elderly

Hitoshi Kagaya
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
Yoichi Shimada
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Neuro and Locomotor Science, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan

RESUMO

Hip fracture is common in the elderly, and its incidence is predicted to increase in many countries. This article focuses on femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, specifically discussing their classification, conservative and operative treatment, rehabilitation protocol, period of functional recovery, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), predictors for outcome, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The information was obtained from a Medline search of articles published in the English language literature. Femoral neck fractures should be classified into undisplaced and displaced fractures, and intertrochanteric fractures should be divided into stable and unstable fractures. Conservative treatment may be considered for undisplaced femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures, but most of these fractures have been operated on. Immediate unrestricted weight bearing after surgery does not seem to increase the failure of any types of hip fracture. The appropriate intensity for rehabilitation is still controversial. Home-based rehabilitation with early discharge may be an alternative. Motor ADL, IADL, and HRQOL increase following hip fracture, but the majority of patients do not regain their prefracture levels. Statistical models with predictive accuracy from an independent sample are useful to predict functional outcome.


Articles with similar content:

Factors Affecting Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture in the Elderly
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.16, 2004, issue 3
Marco Di Monaco
Sliding Screw Implants for Extracapsular Hip Fractures
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.22, 2012, issue 1
loannis Stavrakakis, Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos, Pavlos Katonis, Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Nikolaos A. Stavropoulos, George Kouvidis
Custom-Made Cement-Linked Distal Femoral Replacement for Interprosthetic Femur Fractures: Five-Year Follow-Up
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.28, 2018, issue 2
Paula Stritch, Hosam E. Matar, Nicholas Emms
Clinical Evaluation of a New Total Hip Prosthetic Design: 100 Consecutive Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasties Using Sulzermedica's "Natural Hip" With Two- to Six-Year Clinical and Radiographic Follow-Up
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 1&2
Thomas B. Pace
Clinical Outcomes Following Postacute Comprehensive Rehabilitative Care in Patients with Cardiopulmonary Disease
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.20, 2008, issue 2
Kevin R. Vincent, Heather K. Vincent, Mindy L. Stephenson, Morrow R. Omli