Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
SJR: 0.468 SNIP: 0.671 CiteScore™: 1.65

ISSN Печать: 1072-8325
ISSN Онлайн: 1940-431X

Выпуски:
Том 25, 2019 Том 24, 2018 Том 23, 2017 Том 22, 2016 Том 21, 2015 Том 20, 2014 Том 19, 2013 Том 18, 2012 Том 17, 2011 Том 16, 2010 Том 15, 2009 Том 14, 2008 Том 13, 2007 Том 12, 2006 Том 11, 2005 Том 10, 2004 Том 9, 2003 Том 8, 2002 Том 7, 2001 Том 6, 2000 Том 5, 1999 Том 4, 1998 Том 3, 1997 Том 2, 1995 Том 1, 1994

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i3.40
pages 245-261

METRICS FOR MEASURING BROADENING PARTICIPATION IN NSF PROGRAMS

Norman L. Fortenberry
Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering, USA
Elizabeth T. Cady
Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering, USA
Fitzgerald Bramwell
University of Kentucky, USA
Beatriz Chu Clewell
Education Policy Center, The Urban Institute, USA
Vicki Flaris
Bronx Community College, City University of New York, USA
Eric Jolly
Science Museum of Minnesota, USA
Dianne Martin
George Washington University, Zayed University, USA
Heather Macdonald
College of William & Mary, USA
Muriel Poston
Skidmore College, USA
Armando Rodriguez
Arizona State University, USA
Roberta Spalter-Roth
American Sociological Association, USA

Краткое описание

The National Science Foundation (NSF) has long encouraged its grantees to consider individual and institutional diversity in their activities, specifically through the Broader Impacts merit review criterion. A group representative of the NSF grantee community participated in a workshop to develop metrics by which grantee institutions and individual principal investigators could document their efforts to broaden participation in science and engineering by persons drawn from populations underrepresented in these fields, as well as from institutions that underparticipate in NSF grantee programs. The group proposed that the NSF require its grantee institutions to submit annually and for public display (1) their most recent affirmative action plans, including equal employment opportunity information and utilization reports; and (2) indication of specific collaborations with nonresearch institutions in NSF programs. Deliberations and recommendations of the working group are presented in this article.


Articles with similar content:

The Ethical and Social Dimensions of Home-Based Telemedicine
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 3&4
Keith Alan Bauer
Science in the Sunshine: Transparency of Financial Conflicts of Interest
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.1, 2010, issue 4
Sheldon Krimsky
RECENT TRENDS IN WOMEN'S REPRESENTATION IN SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (SET) IN THE U.K.
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.3, 1997, issue 1&2
Judith Glover, Jane Fielding, Deborah Smeaton
SENIOR WOMEN SCIENTISTS OVERLOOKED AND UNDERSTUDIED?
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.12, 2006, issue 4
Sue V. Rosser
UNDERESTIMATING THE GENDER GAP? AN EXPLORATORY TWO-STEP CLUSTER ANALYSIS OF STEM LABOR SEGMENTATION AND ITS IMPACT ON WOMEN
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.25, 2019, issue 1
Blanca M. Torres Olave