Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences
SJR: 0.275 SNIP: 0.59 CiteScore™: 0.8

ISSN Печать: 1064-2315
ISSN Онлайн: 2163-9337

Выпуски:
Том 52, 2020 Том 51, 2019 Том 50, 2018 Том 49, 2017 Том 48, 2016 Том 47, 2015 Том 46, 2014 Том 45, 2013 Том 44, 2012 Том 43, 2011 Том 42, 2010 Том 41, 2009 Том 40, 2008 Том 39, 2007 Том 38, 2006 Том 37, 2005 Том 36, 2004 Том 35, 2003 Том 34, 2002 Том 33, 2001 Том 32, 2000 Том 31, 1999 Том 30, 1998 Том 29, 1997 Том 28, 1996

Journal of Automation and Information Sciences

DOI: 10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v47.i10.70
pages 69-82

Method for Evaluation of the Uncertainty of the Paired Comparisons Expert Judgements when Calculating the Decision Alternatives Weights

Nadezhda I. Nedashkovskaya
Institute of Applied Systems Analysis of National Technical University of Ukraine "Kiev Polytechnical Institute" of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Ukraine

Краткое описание

The method for the expert judgements of paired comparisons in the problem of calculation of the decision alternatives weights is proposed. This uncertainty is caused by the Saaty's evaluation scale and such expert features as pessimism/optimism. It is shown that the total consistency of expert judgements of paired comparisons can not be an indication of their truth. Therefore, the proposed method is based on the statement that expert judgements of paired comparisons only partially reflect the real ratios of the alternative weights and contain uncertainty regardless of their consistency level. Using the theory of trust (evidence) technique and results of a computer modeling, the general uncertainty index of paired comparisons expert judgementss is defined, when the uncertainty being caused by the Saaty's evaluation scale and personal expert features. This index is subsequently used to calculate the confidence intervals for the relative weights of decisions alternatives, which reflect alternatives importance more reliably in comparison with the point weights.


Articles with similar content:

Ensuring Accuracy and Transparency of Mamdani Fuzzy Model in Learning by Experimental Data
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.39, 2007, issue 8
Sergey D. Shtovba
Simulation of Expert Judgements for Testing the Methods of Information Processing in Decision-Making Support Systems
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.43, 2011, issue 12
Vitaliy V. Tsyganok, Sergey V. Kadenko, Oleg V. Andriichuk
Defining the Relative Weights of the Alternatives Estimation Criteria Based on Clear and Fuzzy Rankings
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.45, 2013, issue 2
Sergey V. Kadenko
Processing Technique for Navigational Measurements on the Basis of Combining the Kalman and Neural-Fuzzy Filters
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.39, 2007, issue 2
Alexander V. Yeliseev
On Sufficiency of the Consistency Level of Group Ordinal Estimates
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.42, 2010, issue 8
Vitaliy V. Tsyganok, Sergey V. Kadenko