Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology
Импакт фактор: 1.404 5-летний Импакт фактор: 3.347 SJR: 0.706 SNIP: 0.55 CiteScore™: 2.19

ISSN Печать: 1040-8401
ISSN Онлайн: 2162-6472

Том 40, 2020 Том 39, 2019 Том 38, 2018 Том 37, 2017 Том 36, 2016 Том 35, 2015 Том 34, 2014 Том 33, 2013 Том 32, 2012 Том 31, 2011 Том 30, 2010 Том 29, 2009 Том 28, 2008 Том 27, 2007 Том 26, 2006 Том 25, 2005 Том 24, 2004 Том 23, 2003 Том 22, 2002 Том 21, 2001 Том 20, 2000 Том 19, 1999 Том 18, 1998 Том 17, 1997 Том 16, 1996 Том 15, 1995 Том 14, 1994

Critical Reviews™ in Immunology

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v19.i5-6.60
31 pages

Hard Science Versus Phenomenology in Reproductive Immunology

David A. Clark
Departments of Medicine, Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Room 3V39, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5

Краткое описание

It has been suggested that studies of immunological aspects of reproduction have recently changed from the phenomenological (e.g., speculative/descriptive) to hard science (e.g., precise molecular description/explanation). The significance of this development is explored by analysis of the contribution made by hard science that has led to a number of assertions. Does HLA-G determine maternal tolerance of her semi-allogeneic fetus? Do differences in placentation between humans, rodents, and other species make direct comparisons largely meaningless? Does membrane cofactor protein (CD46) contribute to pregnancy success by protecting sperm and fetal trophoblast from complement-mediated lysis? Does a low frequency in mice of maternal T cells specific for paternal alloantigens occur, and if so, does phenomenon explain specific maternal tolerance in pregnancy? Do placental and decidual macrophage components provide an important immediate antigen-nonspecific host defense to infection? Does the mix of bioactive molecules make the uterus an immunologically privileged site, and does the molecular melange have a pivotal role in promoting growth and development of the placenta and embryo? Does prolactin acting on receptors on lymphocytes suppress function and thereby account for remission of autoimmune disease in pregnant women? Is the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for recurrent spontaneous abortion a thorny issue that will be resolved by an ongoing funded national trial? What is a scientifically correct timeline of important discoveries and developments in reproductive immunology? It is argued that it is unprofitable to divorce phenomenology from hard science and that the timeline for developments in reproductive immunology begin with Darwin. Irrespective of whether one is dealing with phenomena or hard science data, Hippocrates was correct in his aphorism that "description is infinite and easy; explanation is limited and difficult".

Articles with similar content:

Of Mice and Men: A Critical Reappraisal of the Two-Stage Theory of Carcinogenesis
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.6, 1995, issue 3-6
Olav Hilmar Iversen
Caspase Function and the Immune System
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.26, 2006, issue 2
Sarita Sehra, Alexander L. Dent
The Role of Antigen Presentation in Tumor-Associated Macrophages
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.40, 2020, issue 3
Richard J. Stopforth, Elizabeth Sally Ward
Clinical Trials in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Biomarker-Driven Treatment Allocation: Ready or Not, Here We Come
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.20, 2015, issue 5-6
Phillip A. Abarca, Caitlin Marx, Jennifer L. Strunck, Catherine Neumann, Kevin Y. Kim, Brian Wolf, Robert M. Elashoff, Edward B. Garon, Danielle Nameth
The Multilayered Regulation of the Oncogenic Protein YY1
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.22, 2017, issue 1-2
Raed Rizkallah, Myra M. Hurt