Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Heat Transfer Research
Импакт фактор: 0.404 5-летний Импакт фактор: 0.8 SJR: 0.264 SNIP: 0.504 CiteScore™: 0.88

ISSN Печать: 1064-2285
ISSN Онлайн: 2162-6561

Выпуски:
Том 51, 2020 Том 50, 2019 Том 49, 2018 Том 48, 2017 Том 47, 2016 Том 46, 2015 Том 45, 2014 Том 44, 2013 Том 43, 2012 Том 42, 2011 Том 41, 2010 Том 40, 2009 Том 39, 2008 Том 38, 2007 Том 37, 2006 Том 36, 2005 Том 35, 2004 Том 34, 2003 Том 33, 2002 Том 32, 2001 Том 31, 2000 Том 30, 1999 Том 29, 1998 Том 28, 1997

Heat Transfer Research

DOI: 10.1615/HeatTransRes.2016014017
pages 865-884

EVAPORATION HEAT LOSS IN THE FLAMELET MODEL FOR DILUTE SPRAY FLAMES

Jing Chen
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Minming Zhu
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Minghou Liu
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Yiliang Chen
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China

Краткое описание

The motivation of this paper is to extend the flamelet/progress variables (FPV) approach used successfully in gaseous flames to spray combustion. To consider the evaporation heat loss effect in the FPV approach, two new methods are proposed. One is to correct the gaseous temperature in the flamelet calculation, and the other is to couple this heat loss into the CFD process. To evaluate their performance, the piloted ethanol-air spray flames are simulated by LES in the Eulerian-Lagrangian framework. The simulation results using these two methods and some other existing models are compared with experimental data. It is shown that both methods give lower gaseous temperature compared to the conventional FPV approach and the mean gaseous temperature is closer to the experimental data especially downstream and near the centerline. As to other statistical results (e.g., the mean velocities and rms velocities and SMD), these methods show similar profiles which are all in good agreement with experimental data. The conclusion is that our models can give a good account of the evaporation heat loss. Meanwhile, much lower computational costs are needed compared to the method of solving the enthalpy equation.


Articles with similar content:

HYBRID LES MONTE-CARLO PDF MODELING OF TURBULENT PILOTED JET FLAMES
TSFP DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.5, 2007, issue
Jens Kuehne, Jyh-Yuan Chen, Johannes Janicka, Clemens Olbricht, Amsini Sadiki
HEAT TRANSFER IN FIXED BED CHEMICAL REACTORS
International Heat Transfer Conference 7, Vol.14, 1982, issue
Dieter Vortmeyer, D. J. Gunn
DYNAMIC MODEL FOR PHOSPHATE ROTARY DRYER
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.13, 2008, issue
Mohamed Agouzoul, Tarik Raffak, Mustapha Mabsate, Abdellah Chik, Abdelkader Alouani
CAVITATING BUBBLY FLOW COMPUTATIONS BY MEANS OF MIXTURE BALANCE EQUATIONS
3rd Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference (TFEC), Vol.29, 2018, issue
Dia Zeidan, Lucy T. Zhang, Eric Goncalves
Numerical simulations of wall transpiration in pipe flows
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.0, 2018, issue
H. Ambarlooei, M. J. Rempto