Доступ предоставлен для: Guest

ANALYSIS OF PRESSURE-DEPENDENT RELATIVE PERMEABILITY IN PERMEABILITY JAIL OF TIGHT GAS RESERVOIRS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON TIGHT GAS PRODUCTION

Том 22, Выпуск 13, 2019, pp. 1667-1683
DOI: 10.1615/JPorMedia.2019026122
Get accessGet access

Краткое описание

This paper develops a model for pressure-dependent relative permeability in the presence of permeability jail and analyzes its influence on tight gas production. The model for pressure-dependent relative permeability is derived by introducing a pressure calibration coefficient into the modified Corey equation to describe the influence of pressure on gas flow capability in tight gas reservoirs. The model is validated using experimental data of tight sandstones and is compared with the conventional model. Pressure sensitivity of gas relative permeability is analyzed. Tight gas production affected by pressure-dependent relative permeability is also studied. Results demonstrate that the decrease of pressure can induce the increase of gas relative permeability. The effect of pressure is significant when pressure is low. However, under reservoir condition, when reservoir pressure falls, gas production decreases although gas relative permeability rises because the reduction of reservoir pressure leads to a decreasing pressure drop between reservoir pressure and bottomhole pressure, which has a more significant influence on tight gas production than the effect caused by the rise of gas relative permeability.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА
  1. Amabeoku, M.O., Kersey, D.G., Bin Nasser, R.H., and Al-Belowi, A.R., Relative Permeability Coupled Saturation-Height Models based on Hydraulic (Flow) Units in a Gas Field, SPE Ann. Tech. Conf. Exhib., San Antonio, TX, 2006.

  2. Assiri, W. and Miskimins, J.L., The Water Blockage Effect on Desiccated Tight Gas Reservoir, SPE Int. Symp. Exhib. Form. Damage Control, Lafayette, LA, 2014.

  3. Bahrami, N., Dousi, N., and Lashari, A., Evaluation of Damage Mechanisms in Tight Gas Reservoirs: Integration of Laboratory Experiments and Field Data with Numerical Simulation, SPE Offshore Eur. Conf. Exhib., Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 2015.

  4. Bhandari, A.R., Flemings, P.B., Polito, P. J., Cronin, M.B., and Bryant, S.L., Anisotropy and Stress Dependence of Permeability in the Barnett Shale, Transp. Porous Media, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 393-411, 2015.

  5. Brooks, A.H. and Corey, A.T., Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow, J. Irrig. Drain. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 61-88, 1966.

  6. Byrnes, A.P., Sampath, K., and Randolph, P.L., Effect of Pressure and Water Saturation on Permeability of Western Tight Sandstones, Fifth Annu. Dep. Energy Symp. Enhanced Oil Gas Recovery Improved Drill. Technol., Chicago, IL, 1979.

  7. Cluff, R.M. and Byrnes, A.P., Relative Permeability in Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs-The "Permeability Jail" Model, SPWLA 51st Annu. LoggingSymp., Perth, Australia, 2010.

  8. Corey, A.T., The Interrelations between Gas and Oil Relative Permeabilities, Prod. Mon, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 38-41, 1954.

  9. Dacy, J.M., Core Tests for Relative Permeability of Unconventional Gas Reservoirs, SPE Ann. Tech. Conf. Exhib., Florence, Italy, 2010.

  10. Fang, J., Guo, P., Xiao, X., Du, J., Dong, C., Xiong, Y., and Long, F., Gas-Water Relative Permeability Measurement of High Temperature and High Pressure Tight Gas Reservoirs, Petrol. Explor. Dev., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 92-96, 2015.

  11. Feng, R., Harpalani, S., and Pandey, R., Laboratory Measurement of Stress-Dependent Coal Permeability Using Pulse-Decay Technique and Flow Modeling with Gas Depletion, Fuel, vol. 177, pp. 76-86, 2016.

  12. Friedel, T., Numerical Investigation on Hydraulic Fracture Cleanup and Its Impact on the Productivity of a Gas Well with a Non-Newtonian Fluid Model, 2006 SPE Gas Technol. Symp, Calgary, Canada, 2006.

  13. Fu, X., Agostini, F., Skoczylas, F., and Jeannin, J., Experimental Study of the Stress Dependence of the Absolute and Relative Permeabilities of Some Tight Gas Sandstones, Int. J. RockMech. Min. Sci., vol. 77, pp. 36-43, 2015.

  14. Ghedan, S.G., Dynamic Rock Types for Generating Reliable and Consistent Saturation Functions for Simulation Models, SPE/EAGEReservoir Charact. Simul. Conf., Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2007.

  15. Goda, H.M. and Behrenbruch, P., Using a Modified Brooks-Corey Model to Study Oil-Water Relative Permeability for Diverse Pore Structures, SPE Asia Pac. Oil Gas Conf. Exhib., Perth, Australia, 2004.

  16. Iwere, F.O., Moreno, J.E., and Apaydin, O.G., Numerical Simulation of Thick, Tight Fluvial Sands, SPE Prod. Oper., vol. 26, pp. 388-400, 2006.

  17. Lai, B. and Miskimins, J.L., A New Technique for Accurately Measuring Two-Phase Relative Permeability under Non-Darcy Flow Conditions, SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib, Florence, Italy, 2010.

  18. Lv, Z., Li, S., Liu, G., Zhang, Z., and Guo, X., Factors Affecting the Productivity of a Multifractured Horizontal Well, Petrol. Sci. Technol., vol. 31, no. 22, pp. 2325-2334, 2013.

  19. Mo, F., Du, Z., Peng, X., Tang, Y., and Li, C., A Method to Determine Permeability Jail Boundaries of Tight Sandstone Cores from the Western Sichuan Basin, Petrol. Geol. Recovery Effic., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 121-126,2018.

  20. Mo, F., Du, Z., Peng, X., Tang, Y., and Sun, H., Pore-Scale Analysis of Flow Resistance in Tight Sandstones and Its Relationship with Permeability Jail, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 44, pp. 314-327, 2017.

  21. Pengpeng, G., Wei, S., Ruimin, G., Shengli, G., and Guanfang, Z., A Study of Stress Sensitivity on the Effective Development of Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field, Petrol. Sci. Technol, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 2068-2074, 2014.

  22. Shanley, K.W., Cluff, R.M., and Robinson, J.W., Factors Controlling Prolific Gas Production from Low-Permeability Sandstone Reservoir: Implications for Resource Assessment, Prospect Development, and Risk Analysis, AAPG Bull., vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1083-1121,2004.

  23. Shaoul, J.R., Van Zelm, L.F., and De Pater, H.J., Damage Mechanisms in Unconventional Gas Well Stimulation-A New Look at an Old Problem, SPE Prod. Oper, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 388-400, 2010.

  24. Wang, Y., Chen, Z., Morah, V., Knabe, R.J., and Appel, M., Gas-Phase Relative Permeability Characterization on Tight-Gas Samples, Soc. Petrophys. Well-Log Analysts, vol. 53, pp. 393-400, 2012.

  25. Ward, J.S. and Morrow, N.R., Capillary Pressures and Gas Relative Permeabilities of Low-Permeability Sandstone, SPE Form. Eval., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 345-356, 1987.

  26. Warpinski, N.R. and Teufel, L.W., In-Situ Stresses in Low-Permeability, Nonmarine Rocks, J. Petrol. Technol., vol. 41, pp. 405-414, 1989.

  27. Wattenbarger, R.A. and Alkouh, A.B., New Advances in Shale Reservoir Analysis Using Flowback Data, SPE East. Reg. Meet.., Pittsburgh, PA, 2013.

  28. Wu, Q., Bai, B., Ma, Y., Ok, J.T., Yin, X., andNeeves, K., Optic Imaging of Two-Phase-Flow Behavior in 1DNanoscale Channels, SPE J, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 793-802, 2014.

  29. Yang, Z., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Zhang, X., Lu, K., Du, X., and Guo, P., Measuring Gas-Water Relative Permeability in Tight Sandstones at High-Temperature High-Pressure Conditions: Experimental Design and Correction, SPE Reservoir Charact. Simul. Conf. Exhib, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2017.

  30. Ye, L., Gao, S., Yang, H., Xiong, W., Hu, Z., Liu, H., and Du, S., Water Production Mechanism and Development Strategy of Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs, Nat. Gas Ind., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 41-46, 2015.

  31. Zeng, F. and Zhao, G., Gas Well Productivity Analysis with Non-Darcy Flow and Real-Gas PVT Behavior, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 169-182, 2007.

  32. Zeng, F. and Zhao, G., The Optimal Hydraulic Fracture Geometry under Non-Darcy Flow Effects, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., vol. 72,nos. 1-2, pp. 1443-157,2010.

  33. Zhang, H., Liu, H., Luan, G., He, S., Gu, D., Mo, S., and Lei, G., A Novel Quantitative Petrophysical Model for the Stress Sensitivity of Tight Sandstones, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., vol. 122, pp. 657-666, 2014.

  34. Zhang, R., Ning, Z., Yang, F., Wang, X., Zhao, H., and Wang, Q., Impacts of Nanopore Structure and Elastic Properties on Stress- Dependent Permeability of Gas Shales, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 26, pp. 1663-1672, 2015.

Статьи, принятые к публикации

ON THERMAL CONVECTION IN ROTATING CASSON NANOFLUID PERMEATED WITH SUSPENDED PARTICLES IN A DARCY-BRINKMAN POROUS MEDIUM Pushap Sharma, Deepak Bains, G. C. Rana Effect of Microstructures on Mass Transfer inside a Hierarchically-structured Porous Catalyst Masood Moghaddam, Abbas Abbassi, Jafar Ghazanfarian Insight into the impact of melting heat transfer and MHD on stagnation point flow of tangent hyperbolic fluid over a porous rotating disk Priya Bartwal, Himanshu Upreti, Alok Kumar Pandey Numerical Simulation of 3D Darcy-Forchheimer Hybrid Nanofluid Flow with Heat Source/Sink and Partial Slip Effect across a Spinning Disc Bilal Ali, Sidra Jubair, Md Irfanul Haque Siddiqui Fractal model of solid-liquid two-phase thermal transport characteristics in the rough fracture network shanshan yang, Qiong Sheng, Mingqing Zou, Mengying Wang, Ruike Cui, Shuaiyin Chen, Qian Zheng Application of Artificial Neural Network for Modeling of Motile Microorganism-Enhanced MHD Tangent Hyperbolic Nanofluid across a vertical Slender Stretching Surface Bilal Ali, Shengjun Liu, Hongjuan Liu Estimating the Spreading Rates of Hazardous Materials on Unmodified Cellulose Filter Paper: Implications on Risk Assessment of Transporting Hazardous Materials Heshani Manaweera Wickramage, Pan Lu, Peter Oduor, Jianbang Du ELASTIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN EQUILIBRIUM PORES/HOLES IN POROUS MEDIA UNDER REMOTE STRESS Kostas Davanas Gravity modulation and its impact on weakly nonlinear bio-thermal convection in a porous layer under rotation: a Ginzburg-Landau model approach Michael Kopp, Vladimir Yanovsky Pore structure and permeability behavior of porous media under in-situ stress and pore pressure: Discrete element method simulation on digital core Jun Yao, Chunqi Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Zhaoqin Huang, Fugui Liu, Quan Xu, Yongfei Yang Influence of Lorentz forces on forced convection of Nanofluid in a porous lid driven enclosure Yi Man, Mostafa Barzegar Gerdroodbary SUTTERBY NANOFLUID FLOW WITH MICROORGANISMS AROUND A CURVED EXPANDING SURFACE THROUGH A POROUS MEDIUM: THERMAL DIFFUSION AND DIFFUSION THERMO IMPACTS galal Moatimid, Mona Mohamed, Khaled Elagamy CHARACTERISTICS OF FLOW REGIMES IN SPIRAL PACKED BEDS WITH SPHERES Mustafa Yasin Gökaslan, Mustafa Özdemir, Lütfullah Kuddusi Numerical study of the influence of magnetic field and throughflow on the onset of thermo-bio-convection in a Forchheimer‑extended Darcy-Brinkman porous nanofluid layer containing gyrotactic microorganisms Arpan Garg, Y.D. Sharma, Subit K. Jain, Sanjalee Maheshwari A nanofluid couple stress flow due to porous stretching and shrinking sheet with heat transfer A. B. Vishalakshi, U.S. Mahabaleshwar, V. Anitha, Dia Zeidan ROTATING WAVY CYLINDER ON BIOCONVECTION FLOW OF NANOENCAPSULATED PHASE CHANGE MATERIALS IN A FINNED CIRCULAR CYLINDER Noura Alsedais, Sang-Wook Lee, Abdelraheem Aly Porosity Impacts on MHD Casson Fluid past a Shrinking Cylinder with Suction Annuri Shobha, Murugan Mageswari, Aisha M. Alqahtani, Asokan Arulmozhi, Manyala Gangadhar Rao, Sudar Mozhi K, Ilyas Khan CREEPING FLOW OF COUPLE STRESS FLUID OVER A SPHERICAL FIELD ON A SATURATED BIPOROUS MEDIUM Shyamala Sakthivel , Pankaj Shukla, Selvi Ramasamy
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции Цены и условия подписки Begell House Контакты Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain