Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Импакт фактор: 3.259 5-летний Импакт фактор: 2.547 SJR: 0.417 SNIP: 0.8 CiteScore™: 1.52

ISSN Печать: 2152-5080
ISSN Онлайн: 2152-5099

Свободный доступ

International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2012003562
pages 363-381

A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION WITH APPLICATION TO SUPERSONIC NOZZLE THRUST

Christopher J. Roy
Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
Michael S. Balch
Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York 11733, USA

Краткое описание

In modeling and simulation (M&S), we seek to predict the state of a system using a computer-based simulation of a differential equation-based model. In general, the inputs to the model may contain uncertainty due to inherent randomness (aleatory uncertainty), a lack of knowledge (epistemic uncertainty), or a combination of the two. In many practical cases, there is so little knowledge of a model input that it should be characterized as an interval, the weakest statement of knowledge. When some model inputs are probabilistic and others are intervals, segregated uncertainty propagation should be used. The resulting uncertainty structure on the M&S output can take the form of a cumulative distribution function with a finite width; i.e., a p-box. Implications of sampling over interval versus probabilistic uncertainties in the outer loop are discussed and examples are given showing the effects of the choice of uncertainty propagation and characterization methods. In addition to the uncertainties in model inputs, uncertainties also arise due to modeling deficiencies and numerical approximations. Modeling uncertainties can be reduced by performing additional experiments and numerical uncertainties can be reduced by using additional computational resources; thus, both sources of uncertainty can be modeled as epistemic and can be characterized as intervals and included in the total predictive uncertainty by appropriately broadening the prediction p-box. A simple example is given for the M&S predictions of supersonic nozzle thrust that incorporates and quantifies all three sources of uncertainty.


Articles with similar content:

AN ADAPTIVE MULTIFIDELITY PC-BASED ENSEMBLE KALMAN INVERSION FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.9, 2019, issue 3
Tao Zhou, Liang Yan
ON THE ROBUSTNESS OF STRUCTURAL RISK OPTIMIZATION WITH RESPECT TO EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.2, 2012, issue 1
W. J. S. Gomes, F. A. V. Bazan, Andre T. Beck
A MIXED UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION APPROACH USING EVIDENCE THEORY AND STOCHASTIC EXPANSIONS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.5, 2015, issue 1
Tyler Winter, Serhat Hosder, Harsheel Shah
SIMULATION OF FUEL-EXHAUST MIXING IN EXHAUST AFTERTREATMENT SYSTEMS USING SIMPLIFIED SPRAY MODELS FOR PULSE-WIDTH MODULATED FUEL INJECTORS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 5
James E. McCarthy, Jr.
Branch-and-Bound Method for Problems of the Euclidian Combinatorial Optimization on Combinations
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.49, 2017, issue 5
Alexandra O. Yemets