Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Multiphase Science and Technology
SJR: 0.124 SNIP: 0.222 CiteScore™: 0.26

ISSN Печать: 0276-1459
ISSN Онлайн: 1943-6181

Выпуски:
Том 31, 2019 Том 30, 2018 Том 29, 2017 Том 28, 2016 Том 27, 2015 Том 26, 2014 Том 25, 2013 Том 24, 2012 Том 23, 2011 Том 22, 2010 Том 21, 2009 Том 20, 2008 Том 19, 2007 Том 18, 2006 Том 17, 2005 Том 16, 2004 Том 15, 2003 Том 14, 2002 Том 13, 2001 Том 12, 2000 Том 11, 1999 Том 10, 1998 Том 9, 1997 Том 8, 1994 Том 7, 1993 Том 6, 1992 Том 5, 1990 Том 4, 1989 Том 3, 1987 Том 2, 1986 Том 1, 1982

Multiphase Science and Technology

DOI: 10.1615/MultScienTechn.v6.i1-4.330
pages 639-651

COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.5: KELVIN-HELMHOLTZ INSTABILITY

F. Villasenor
Concentration, Heat and Momentum Ltd.(CHAM), Bukey House, 40 High Street, Wimbledon Village, London, SW11 5AU, England
Dudley Brian Spalding
Concentration, Heat, and Momentum (CHAM), Limited, Bakery House, 40 High Street, Wimbledon Village, London SW19 5AU, England

Краткое описание

Predictions obtained using four computer codes are compared with the analytical solution for Kelvin-Helmholtz instability for the conditions specified in Numerical Benchmark Test No. 2.5 (D. L. Youngs, Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol. 3, pp.477−479, 1987). There are considerable differences in the predictive instability growth between various codes. These results were given which showed that, with too fine a nodalisation, rapid growth of the instability occurs with numerical damping failing to stop the growth at high wave number instabilities.