Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering

Выходит 6 номеров в год

ISSN Печать: 1543-1649

ISSN Онлайн: 1940-4352

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.4 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.3 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 2.2 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00034 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.46 SJR: 0.333 SNIP: 0.606 CiteScore™:: 3.1 H-Index: 31

Indexed in

Treatment of Constraints in Complex Multibody Systems. Part I: Methods of Constrained Dynamics

Том 1, Выпуск 2&3, 2003, 18 pages
DOI: 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v1.i23.80
Get accessGet access

Краткое описание

The objective of this investigation is to discuss the use of several nonlinear dynamic formulations for modeling constraints in large-scale multibody systems in general, and tracked vehicles in particular. Among the formulations discussed in this article are the augmented method, the nonpartitioning augmented method, the recursive method, and the penalty method. In the augmented formulation, the vehicle kinematic constraints that describe mechanical joints and specified motion trajectories are augmented to the system dynamic equations using the technique of Lagrange multipliers. A Newton–Raphson algorithm and a coordinate partitioning scheme are used to ensure that the kinematic constraint equations are satisfied at the position level. In the nonpartitioning augmented formulation, no check is made to satisfy the kinematic constraint equations and, as a consequence, no coordinate partitioning is required. In the recursive formulation, the system kinematic equations are expressed in terms of the joint degrees of freedom. This formulation allows for modeling spherical, revolute, prismatic, and cylindrical joints. Using this formulation, closed loop chains are modeled using the recursive joint formulation, and cuts are made at selected secondary joints in order to avoid the singular configurations. In the penalty formulation, mechanical joints are modeled using elastic force elements that have assumed stiffness and damping coefficients. These above-mentioned four formulations are discussed in this article. Results of the computer simulations of a large-scale bulldozer model are presented in Part II of this two-part article.

ЦИТИРОВАНО В
  1. Wallin Michael, Aboubakr Ahmed K., Jayakumar Paramsothy, Letherwood Michael D., Gorsich David J., Hamed Ashraf, Shabana Ahmed A., A comparative study of joint formulations: application to multibody system tracked vehicles, Nonlinear Dynamics, 74, 3, 2013. Crossref

Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции Цены и условия подписки Begell House Контакты Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain