Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Atomization and Sprays
Импакт фактор: 1.262 5-летний Импакт фактор: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Печать: 1044-5110
ISSN Онлайн: 1936-2684

Выпуски:
Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000 Том 9, 1999 Том 8, 1998 Том 7, 1997 Том 6, 1996 Том 5, 1995 Том 4, 1994 Том 3, 1993 Том 2, 1992 Том 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v17.i3.20
pages 233-265

GASOLINE SPRAYS INJECTED AT DIFFERENT BACK PRESSURES: CALCULATIONS USING TWO ATOMIZATION MODELS

N. B. H. Abdelkarim
Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Salah S. Ibrahim
Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicester, LE11 3TU, UK
Assaad Masri
The University of Sydney
Graham Wigley
Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Stewart Miller Building, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, United Kingdom

Краткое описание

A numerical study of pressure-swirl hollow-cone sprays injected at two different ambient pressures is presented to simulate the gasoline direct-injection process. Only nonreacting sprays are considered, with the focus being on the breakup and atomization processes. Two different breakup models have been evaluated, (1) a hybrid version of a sheet length model combined with the Taylor analogy breakup as a secondary breakup model and (2) the surface wave instability breakup model. Two test cases, injection into atmospheric and above-atmospheric ambient pressure were computed for the assessment of the breakup models. Comparison of calculations with experimental data reveals sufficient agreement. However, the models' performance was case dependent, which suggested further investigation of their breakup mechanisms.


Articles with similar content:

INJECTION, ATOMIZATION AND MIXING OF PROPELLANTS IN LIQUID ROCKET ENGINES USING COXIAL INJECTORS
ICLASS 94
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Vol.0, 1994, issue
G. Krulle, W. Mayer
MODELING ATOMIZATION PROCESSES OF PRESSURE-SWIRL HOLLOW-CONE FUEL SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.7, 1997, issue 6
Rolf D. Reitz, Scott E. Parrish, Zhiyu Han, Patrick V. Farrell
ON THE SHEET BREAKUP OF DIRECT-INJECTION GASOLINE PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZER SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.17, 2007, issue 6
P. W. Loustalan, Martin H. Davy
TRANSIENT MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODELING OF AIR-BLAST ATOMIZERS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.13, 2003, issue 4
Louis M. Chiappetta, David P. Schmidt, Ravi K. Madabhushi, Graham M. Goldin
MODELING SPRAY ATOMIZATION WITH THE KELVIN-HELMHOLTZ/RAYLEIGH-TAYLOR HYBRID MODEL
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.9, 1999, issue 6
Rolf D. Reitz, Jennifer C. Beale