Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Atomization and Sprays
Импакт фактор: 1.262 5-летний Импакт фактор: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Печать: 1044-5110
ISSN Онлайн: 1936-2684

Выпуски:
Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000 Том 9, 1999 Том 8, 1998 Том 7, 1997 Том 6, 1996 Том 5, 1995 Том 4, 1994 Том 3, 1993 Том 2, 1992 Том 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v15.i4.80
pages 469-488

DROPLET FORMATION FROM A THIN HOLLOW LIQUID JET WITH A CORE AIR FLOW

Chul Jin Choi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Science Town, Daejeon 305-701, Korea
Sang Yong Lee
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea

Краткое описание

The mechanism of drop formation from a thin hollow liquid (water) jet with a high-velocity core gas (air) flow was examined. Spray configuration was visualized and mean (cross-section-averaged) Sauter mean diameter (SMD), radial distribution of local SMD, and volume concentration of drops were measured for various liquid and gas injection velocities and annulus gap clearances. The atomization quality was improved with a higher flow rate of atomizing gas; however, dependence of drop size on liquid flow rate turned out to be complicated. With an increase in liquid flow rate, the mean SMD first increases, then decreases, and then increases again, up to a maximum, followed by a decreasing range. Flow regimes (laminar or turbulent) and the momentum strengths of the liquid and the gas, and their combinations, were considered as the primary factors determining the overall atomization characteristics. The aerodynamic force was proven to be dominant in the first three ranges of liquid flow rate, while the hydrodynamic force predominates in the last range.


Articles with similar content:

DROPLET FORMATION FROM A THIN HOLLOW LIQUID JET WITH A CORE AIR FLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.15, 2005, issue 5
Sang Yong Lee, Chul Jin Choi
INFLUENCE OF TWO-PHASE FEED BUBBLE SIZE ON EFFERVESCENT ATOMIZATION IN A HORIZONTAL NOZZLE ASSEMBLY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.21, 2011, issue 3
Jason S. Olfert, Johana Gomez, Brian A. Fleck, J. McMillan
SPRAY ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF A LOW PRESSURE ROTARY INJECTOR
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.29, 2019, issue 6
Kushal Ghate, Thirumalachari Sundararajan, Shraddha Sharma
AN APPRAISAL OF SWIRL ATOMIZER INVISCID FLOW ANALYSIS, PART 2: INVISCID SPRAY CONE ANGLE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF INVISCID METHODS WITH EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FOR DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT, AIR CORE RADIUS, AND SPRAY CONE ANGLE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 3
John Joss Chinn
AIR-ASSIST PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.9, 1999, issue 2
Paul E. Sojka, U. T. Schmidt