Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Atomization and Sprays
Импакт фактор: 1.262 5-летний Импакт фактор: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Печать: 1044-5110
ISSN Онлайн: 1936-2684

Выпуски:
Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000 Том 9, 1999 Том 8, 1998 Том 7, 1997 Том 6, 1996 Том 5, 1995 Том 4, 1994 Том 3, 1993 Том 2, 1992 Том 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2017016338
pages 345-365

INVESTIGATION OF HOMOGENEOUS RELAXATION MODEL PARAMETERS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR GASOLINE INJECTORS

Kaushik Saha
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
Sibendu Som
Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, 60439, USA
Michele Battistoni
Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL; Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Italy

Краткое описание

Flash boiling is known to be a common phenomenon for gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine sprays. The Homogeneous Relaxation Model has been adopted in many recent numerical studies for predicting cavitation and flash boiling. The Homogeneous Relaxation Model is assessed in this study. Sensitivity analysis of the model parameters has been documented to infer the driving factors for the flash-boiling predictions. The model parameters have been varied over a range and the differences in predictions of the extent of flashing have been studied. Apart from flashing in the near-nozzle regions, mild cavitation is also predicted inside the gasoline injectors. The variation in the predicted time scales through the model parameters for predicting these two different thermodynamic phenomena (cavitation, flash) have been elaborated in this study. Turbulence model effects have also been investigated by comparing predictions from the standard and Re-Normalization Group (RNG) k−ε turbulence models.


Articles with similar content:

GASOLINE SPRAYS INJECTED AT DIFFERENT BACK PRESSURES: CALCULATIONS USING TWO ATOMIZATION MODELS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.17, 2007, issue 3
Salah S. Ibrahim, Graham Wigley, N. B. H. Abdelkarim, Assaad Masri
ATOMISATION IN TURBULENT FLOWS: MODELLING FOR APPLICATION
TSFP DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.3, 2003, issue
A. A. Burluka, Novid Beheshti, Michael Fairweather
THE SPRAY-INDUCED FLOW AND ITS EFFECT ON THE TURBULENT CHARACTERISTIC COMBUSTION TIME IN Dl DIESEL ENGINES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.12, 2002, issue 1-3
Rolf D. Reitz, Franz X. Tanner
GENERATION AND SHOCK WAVE CHARACTERISTICS OF UNSTEADY PULSED SUPERSONIC LIQUID JETS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.13, 2003, issue 5&6
Brian E. Milton, K. Pianthong, Masud Behnia
ONE-DIMENSIONAL DIESEL SPRAY MODELING OF MULTICOMPONENT FUELS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.25, 2015, issue 6
W. Vera-Tudela, Jose M. Pastor, Jose M. Garcia-Oliver, Jose V. Pastor