Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Atomization and Sprays
Импакт фактор: 1.737 5-летний Импакт фактор: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Печать: 1044-5110
ISSN Онлайн: 1936-2684

Выпуски:
Том 30, 2020 Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000 Том 9, 1999 Том 8, 1998 Том 7, 1997 Том 6, 1996 Том 5, 1995 Том 4, 1994 Том 3, 1993 Том 2, 1992 Том 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v15.i6.50
pages 699-736

SINGLE-DROP EMPIRICAL MODELS FOR SPRAY IMPACT ON SOLID WALLS: A REVIEW

Gianpietro Cossali
University of Bergamo
Marco Marengo
Advanced Engineering Centre, School of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK; Department of Engineering, University of Bergamo, Viale Marconi 5, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy
Maurizio Santini
Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Viale Marconi 5, 24044 Dalmine, Italy

Краткое описание

Simplified impingement models are largely used in numerical simulation of spray impingement on solid walls, since the direct simulation of multiple drop impact is outside of the present computer capabilities. These models are usually semiempirical, based on single-drop impact experimental data and some reasonable constraints to allow extrapolation to different impact conditions. This article presents a comparison of the most commonly used drop impingement models in the present scientific literature and in commercial codes. A classification of the models and a unified scheme is proposed in terms of driving variables and outcomes. Every model is then analyzed and its peculiarities and possible weaknesses are pointed out, especially those related to the physical consistency. Finally, a comparison among the various models for a possible use in Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) and diesel spray simulation is presented.


Articles with similar content:

EVALUATION OF PLAIN-JET AIR BLAST ATOMIZATION AND EVAPORATION OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS IN A SMALL GAS TURBINE ENGINE APPLICATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 8
Christopher D. Bolszo, Vincent G. McDonell
Revisiting Numerical Simulation of Hot Jet in Cross Flow
Proceedings of the 25th National and 3rd International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference (IHMTC-2019), Vol.0, 2019, issue
Yair Mor-Yossef, Dhanabal K., Nikhil Vijay Shende
EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF INDUSTRIAL TWIN-FLUID ATOMIZERS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.16, 2006, issue 2
Eduardo Lincheta, Antonio Lozano, Felix Barreras, Jorge Barroso
MODELLING OF THE IRREVERSIBILITY OF THE HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER − SIMILARITY OF IRREVERSIBILITY
International Heat Transfer Conference 7, Vol.14, 1982, issue
G. St. Kalitzin
NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF VARIOUS SPRAY BREAKUP AND DROPLET COLLISION MODELS IN THE MODELING OF IN-CYLINDER FUEL SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.22, 2012, issue 10
M. Mofarrahi, Reza Kamali