Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Atomization and Sprays
Импакт фактор: 1.262 5-летний Импакт фактор: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Печать: 1044-5110
ISSN Онлайн: 1936-2684

Выпуски:
Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000 Том 9, 1999 Том 8, 1998 Том 7, 1997 Том 6, 1996 Том 5, 1995 Том 4, 1994 Том 3, 1993 Том 2, 1992 Том 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v17.i6.20
pages 501-528

ON THE SHEET BREAKUP OF DIRECT-INJECTION GASOLINE PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZER SPRAYS

Martin H. Davy
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2054-6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z4, Canada
P. W. Loustalan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom

Краткое описание

An experimental study into the sheet breakup mechanisms of two direct-injection gasoline pressure-swirl atomizers has been performed under conditions of varying fuel pressure and injector back pressure. A novel method of illumination, which allows a single thickness of the hollow-cone spray to be examined, has been developed. The results of the study indicate that there are three major mechanisms contributing to the ultimate disintegration of the liquid sheet, namely, aerodynamic instability, perforated sheet breakup, and air-core induced disturbances. The relative importance of the breakup mechanisms is shown to depend on atomizer operating condition and nozzle geometry. Sheet breakup lengths determined experimentally by a void-fraction analysis were compared with the predictions of three breakup models from the literature. The comparison suggests that the models underpredict the breakup length under all but substantially subatmospheric back-pressure conditions. The results also indicate that special care is required when using existing breakup models where atomizers with offset-nozzle geometries are used.


Articles with similar content:

MODELING SPRAY ATOMIZATION WITH THE KELVIN-HELMHOLTZ/RAYLEIGH-TAYLOR HYBRID MODEL
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.9, 1999, issue 6
Rolf D. Reitz, Jennifer C. Beale
AIR-ASSIST PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.9, 1999, issue 2
Paul E. Sojka, U. T. Schmidt
THREE-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATION OF EFFERVESCENT ATOMIZATION SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 1
Jianzhong Lin, Ze-Fei Zhu, Hong-Bing Xiong
EFFECT OF LIQUID PROPERTIES ON THE BREAKUP MECHANISM OF HIGH-SPEED LIQUID DROPS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.11, 2001, issue 1
Rolf D. Reitz, Chang Sik Lee
TWIN-FLUID ATOMIZATION: FACTORS INFLUENCING MEAN DROP SIZE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.2, 1992, issue 2
Arthur H. Lefebvre