Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Atomization and Sprays
Импакт фактор: 1.262 5-летний Импакт фактор: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Печать: 1044-5110
ISSN Онлайн: 1936-2684

Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000 Том 9, 1999 Том 8, 1998 Том 7, 1997 Том 6, 1996 Том 5, 1995 Том 4, 1994 Том 3, 1993 Том 2, 1992 Том 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v4.i2.60
pages 223-236


Suresh Aggarwal
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Illinois at Chicago
Y. Xiao
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60680
J. Uthuppan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60680

Краткое описание

Numerical results are presented to characterize the dependence of particle dispersion on the Stokes number, and to identify the appropriate particle response time and flow time scales used in defining the Stokes number. Two particle-laden shear flows considered for illustrating these scales are a planar shear layer and an axisymmetric jet. Two-dimensional large-scale features of these flows are computed by using the flux-corrected transport (FCT), time step-splitting algorithm. Particles of different sizes are injected into the shear layer and their dispersion behavior is quantified by using a global dispersion function. Results indicate that the particle dispersion maximizes at a certain value of the Stokes number, defined as a ratio of the particle aerodynamic response time to the characteristic flow time. It is argued, however, that a correct flow time can be based on the dominant frequencies associated with the large-scale organized structures, and not just the global velocity and length scales. Results from the present simulation and several experimental studies on particle dispersion are used to support the argument. In addition, the validity of the Stokes drag law in defining the particle response time in realistic two-phase flow is examined.