Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Atomization and Sprays
Импакт фактор: 1.262 5-летний Импакт фактор: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 1.6

ISSN Печать: 1044-5110
ISSN Онлайн: 1936-2684

Выпуски:
Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000 Том 9, 1999 Том 8, 1998 Том 7, 1997 Том 6, 1996 Том 5, 1995 Том 4, 1994 Том 3, 1993 Том 2, 1992 Том 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2014008424
pages 747-760

MEASURING DROPLET SIZE OF AGRICULTURAL SPRAY NOZZLES−MEASUREMENT DISTANCE AND AIRSPEED EFFECTS

Bradley K. Fritz
USDA-ARS-Aerial Application Research Unit, College Station, Texas, USA
W. Clint Hoffmann
USDA-ARS-Aerial Application Research Unit, College Station, Texas, USA
W. E. Bagley
Wilbur-Ellis, 75289 San Antonio, Texas
Greg R. Kruger
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, Nebraska 75289
Zbigniew Czaczyk
Poznan University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wojska Polskiego 28, PL60-637 Poznan, Independent Consultant, os. B. Chrobrego 13/154, 60-681 Poznan, Poland
Ryan S. Henry
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, Nebraska 75289

Краткое описание

With a number of new spray testing laboratories going into operation and each gearing up to measure spray atomization from agricultural spray nozzles using laser diffraction, establishing and following a set of scientific standard procedures is crucial to long-term data generation and standardization across the industry. It has long been recognized that while offering ease of use as compared to other methods, laser diffraction measurements do not account for measurement bias effects due to differential velocities between differing sized spray droplets, and in many cases significantly overestimate the fine droplet portion of the spray. Droplet sizes and velocities were measured for three agricultural flat fan nozzles (8002, 8008, and 6510) each at three spray pressures (138,276, and 414 kPa) at four downstream distances (15.2, 30.5, 45.7, and 76.2 cm) across a range of concurrent air velocities (0.7−80.5 m/s). At air velocities below 6.7 m/s, large gradients in droplet velocities resulted in over-estimation of both the 10% volume diameter (Dv0.1) by more than 10% and the percent volume of the spray less than 100 µm (V<100) was overestimated two- to three-fold. The optimal measurement distance to reduce droplet measurement bias to less than 5% was found to be 30.5 cm with a concurrent air velocity of 6.7 m/s for measuring droplet size from ground nozzles. For aerial spray nozzles, the optimal distance was 45.7 cm. Use of these methods provides for more accurate droplet size data for use in efficacy testing and drift assessments, and significantly increases inter-lab reproducibility.


Articles with similar content:

INFLUENCE OF AIR FLOW DYNAMICS ON DROPLET SIZE IN CONDITIONS OF AIR-ASSISTED SPRAYERS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.22, 2012, issue 4
Zbigniew Czaczyk
GASOLINE SPRAYS IN UNIFORM CROSSFLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.17, 2007, issue 7
Jim H. Whitelaw, J. M. Nouri
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF DROPLET COALESCENCE IN A FULL-CONE SPRAY FROM A TWO-FLUID NOZZLE USING LASER DIFFRACTION MEASUREMENTS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.14, 2004, issue 4
M. Valencia-Bejarano, T. A. G. Langrish
EVALUATION OF SPRAY DROPLET SPECTRUM OF SPRAYERS USED FOR VECTOR CONTROL
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.26, 2016, issue 8
Bradley K. Fritz, Noel Cote, Todd W. Walker, Vincent L. Smith, W. Clint Hoffmann, Muhammad Farooq
DROPLET SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF ADJUVANT-AMENDED SPRAYS FROM AN AIR-ASSISTED FIVE-PORT PWM NOZZLE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.21, 2011, issue 3
Jiabing Gu, Weimin Ding, Hong Young Jeon, Heping Zhu