ISSN Печать: 2151-805X
Выпуски:Том 10, 2019 Том 9, 2018 Том 8, 2017 Том 7, 2016 Том 6, 2015 Том 6, 2015 Том 5, 2014 Том 5, 2014 Том 5, 2014 Том 5, 2014 Том 4, 2013 Том 4, 2013 Том 4, 2013 Том 4, 2013 Том 3, 2012 Том 3, 2012 Том 2, 2011 Том 2, 2011 Том 2, 2011 Том 2, 2011 Том 1, 2010 Том 1, 2010 Том 1, 2010 Том 1, 2010
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal
Minding Brain Science in Medicine: On the Need for Neuroethical Engagement for Guidance of Neuroscience in Clinical Contexts
Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry, and the Neuroethics Studies Program, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.
John R. Shook
Department of Philosophy, and Graduate School of Education, University at Buffalo, Buffalo New York, USA
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (PCSBI) released the second volume of its Gray Matters report in March 2015 to address neuroethical, legal, and social issues arising in and from efforts of the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative. In concert with recommendations made in the Gray Matters volumes, we herein offer what we believe to be four crucial−and actionable−goals for neuroethics: First, neuroethics should be dedicated to evaluating the validity and value of current and proposed approaches to assessing and altering the structure and functions of the brain. Second, neuroethical tools and methods must be developed to interpret, and enable sound use of neuroscientific information, techniques, and technologies in biomedical research and clinical practice. Third, neuroethics should use newly emerging neuroscientific findings to inform common conceptions and definitions of the normal structure and functions of the brain, and how the brain should be treated to recover or improve its functional capacities. Fourth, neuroethics should be prominently featured in the education and training of researchers and clinicians, so as to enable more pragmatic and ethically prudent capability in laboratory and clinical settings, as well as policy- and public-oriented fields, organizations, and agencies.
Ключевые слова: neuroethics, neuroscience, neurotechnology, medicine, guidelines, funding, education
Articles with similar content:
Advancing Neuroscience on the 21st− Century World Stage: The Need for and a Proposed Structure of an Internationally Relevant Neuroethics
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.4, 2013, issue 3
James Giordano, Roland Newman, John R. Shook, Elisabetta Lanzilao
Research Involving Minors−A Duty of Solidarity?
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.6, 2015, issue 1-2
Bert Heinrichs, Joerg Loeschke
Implantable Nano-Neurotechnological Devices: Consideration of Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues and Implications
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.19, 2009, issue 1
James Giordano, Dennis K. McBride, Rohan Akhouri
Abstract of "Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Neurotechnology Research: Confronting the Boundaries and Considering the Implications"
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.18, 2008, issue 1
Dennis K. McBride
THE ASSESSING WOMEN IN ENGINEERING PROJECT: A MODEL FOR SUSTAINABLE AND PROFITABLE COLLABORATION
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.10, 2004, issue 3
Rose M. Marra, Barbara Bogue
|Портал||Begell Электронная Бибилиотека||e-Книги||Журналы||Справочники и Сборники статей||Коллекции|