Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
SJR: 0.121 SNIP: 0.228 CiteScore™: 0.17

ISSN Печать: 0896-2960
ISSN Онлайн: 2162-6553

Выпуски:
Том 31, 2019 Том 30, 2018 Том 29, 2017 Том 28, 2016 Том 27, 2015 Том 26, 2014 Том 25, 2013 Том 24, 2012 Том 23, 2011 Том 22, 2010 Том 21, 2009 Том 20, 2008 Том 19, 2007 Том 18, 2006 Том 17, 2005 Том 16, 2004 Том 15, 2003 Том 14, 2002 Том 13, 2001 Том 12, 2000 Том 11, 1999 Том 10, 1998 Том 9, 1997 Том 8, 1996 Том 7, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v10.i4.30
pages 359-367

Cost-Effectiveness of Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury

Diana D. Cardenas
University of Washington, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seattle, WA
Jason N. Doctor
University of Washington, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seattle, WA

Краткое описание

Spinal cord injury is associated with significant disability and enormous costs as medical technology and life expectancies improve. This review describes the growing body of evidence for cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation in spinal cord injury. The objective of cost-effectiveness research is to help decision-makers allocate resources for healthcare in such a way that health for a given population is optimized. Cost-effectiveness analysis involves comparing a status quo intervention to an alternative treatment to determine if the alternative is more cost-effective than the standard. In most industrialized countries rehabilitation is an established "standard of care" intervention after spinal cord injury. Therefore, rehabilitation is not offered as an alternative to some other status quo intervention. Rehabilitation involves multiple treatment components and multiple disciplines. Individual attention to specific interventions and specific aspects of outcome is necessary in cost-effectiveness analysis of rehabilitation after spinal cord injury. For the evaluation of rehabilitation programs, a quality-adjusted life years approach is preferable to cost-effectiveness outcomes measurement that involves only the study of years of life lived. Studies of devices to improve function such as sacral anterior root stimulators and intrathecal baclofen pumps are the best examples of cost-effectiveness analysis found in the literatures. Comparisons of acute care and initial rehabilitation of the patient with spinal cord injury admitted to specialized spinal cord injury systems have compared treatments over differing time periods that suggest that early referral to a specialized model center reduces length of stay, cost, and medical complications. Like most areas of medicine, the study of cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments after a spinal cord injury is still in the early stages of development. Future studies should strive to follow published guidelines such as those described by the panel convened in 1993 by the U.S. Public Health Service. Spinal cord injury is not as common as many other types of disabling injuries and diseases, but its costs are enormous and increasing as medical technology and life expectancies improve. In 1992, according to DeVivo, aggregate costs of new cases of spinal cord injury were estimated to be $7.2 billion per year, one-third the cost of stroke. So, despite an incidence of new spinal cord injuries of only about 40 cases per million persons per year in the U.S., spinal cord injury uses a disproportionate piece of the health-care dollar. Efforts to help reduce costs while assuring quality of care are important. This review examines the growing body of evidence for cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation in SCI.


Articles with similar content:

Prevention of Disabling Back Injuries in Nurses by the Use of Mechanical Patient Lift Systems
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.14, 2004, issue 6
William B. Long III, Richard Edlich, Kathryne L. Winters, L. D. Britt, Mary Anne Hudson
Medical Missions in Jordan: A Series of Upper-Extremity Orthopedic Injuries
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.28, 2018, issue 3
Kimona Issa, Aiman Rifai, Yasmine Rifai, Todd P. Pierce, Jennifer Kurowicki
Ethics of End-of-Life Care: The Need for Improved Communication among Physicians, Patients, and Families
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.2, 2011, issue 1
D. Passigli, S. Paul, Pamela S. Saha, Subrata Saha, R. Sarkar
Optimizing Outcome in the Injured Worker with Low Back Pain
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.11, 1999, issue 2
Scott F. Nadler, Todd P. Stitik, Gerard A. Malanga
Ethics and Aging: Challenges for the Dental Practitioner
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.2, 2011, issue 2
Sharmila Chatterjee