Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Ассоциированный редактор: Rajani Mullerpatan (open in a new tab)

Выходит 4 номеров в год

ISSN Печать: 0896-2960

ISSN Онлайн: 2162-6553

SJR: 0.141 SNIP: 0.129 CiteScore™:: 0.6 H-Index: 18

Indexed in

The Clinical Effectiweness of TENS in Pain Management

Том 12, Выпуск 2, 2000, pp. 131-149
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v12.i2.40
Get accessGet access

Краткое описание

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is used extensively throughout the world to manage painful conditions, including postoperative pain, labor pain, and chronic pain. However, the results of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TENS have questioned the clinical effectiveness of TENS for these conditions. This article critically evaluates TENS effectiveness in light of these systematic reviews and demonstrates that methodological problems associated with RCTs included in systematic reviews may account in part for the negative findings. TENS effectiveness has been determined by some authors using comparisons with active treatments, such as conventional medication, although this is inappropriate because both TENS and the active treatment may be more effective than a placebo control. A sham TENS control group is necessary to determine absolute clinical effectiveness, although in practice this may be difficult to achieve. The authenticity of claims of double-blind procedures in TENS trials is questioned and the role of triple-blinding in trials of TENS discussed. The wide variety of TENS treatment protocols used in RCTs highlights the difficulty of synthesizing the results of TENS trials. Inappropriate TENS treatment interventions in studies with high methodological quality scores emphasize the danger of taking RCT results at face value. This article concludes that it would be hasty to withdraw support for the use of TENS in the management of acute and chronic pain at present as methodological problems associated with some of the RCTs included in systematic reviews may account for the negative findings.

Ключевые слова: TENS, effectiveness, systematic review, pain, analgesia
ЦИТИРОВАНО В
  1. Bjordal Jan Magnus, Bogen Bård, Lopes-Martins Rodrigo Alvaro Brandao, Klovning Atle, Can Cochrane Reviews in Controversial Areas Be Biased? A Sensitivity Analysis Based on the Protocol of a Systematic Cochrane Review on Low-Level Laser Therapy in Osteoarthritis, Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 23, 5, 2005. Crossref

  2. Ng M. M. L., Leung Mason C. P., Poon D. M. Y., The Effects of Electro-Acupuncture and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Patients with Painful Osteoarthritic Knees: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Follow-Up Evaluation, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 9, 5, 2003. Crossref

  3. Bjordal Jan Magnus, Johnson Mark I., Ljunggreen Anne Elisabeth, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce postoperative analgesic consumption. A meta-analysis with assessment of optimal treatment parameters for postoperative pain, European Journal of Pain, 7, 2, 2003. Crossref

  4. Atamaz Funda C., Durmaz Berrin, Baydar Meltem, Demircioglu Ozlem Y., Iyiyapici Ayse, Kuran Banu, Oncel Sema, Sendur Omer F., Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Interferential Currents, and Shortwave Diathermy in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 5, 2012. Crossref

  5. Button Vera Lucia Da Silveira Nantes, Electrodes for Biopotential Recording and Tissue Stimulation, in Principles of Measurement and Transduction of Biomedical Variables, 2015. Crossref

  6. Palmer Shea T, Martin Denis J, Steedman Wilma M, Ravey John, Effects of electric stimulation on C and A delta fiber-mediated thermal perception thresholds 11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated., Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1, 2004. Crossref

  7. Agripino Mayara E. d. J., Lima Lucas V., Freitas Ingrid F., Souto Natália B. R., Carvalho Taís C. S., DeSantana Josimari M., Influence of Therapeutic Approach in the TENS-induced Hypoalgesia, The Clinical Journal of Pain, 32, 7, 2016. Crossref

  8. Johnson Mark I, Tabasam Ghazala, An Investigation Into the Analgesic Effects of Interferential Currents and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Experimentally Induced Ischemic Pain in Otherwise Pain-Free Volunteers, Physical Therapy, 83, 3, 2003. Crossref

  9. Juárez-Albuixech María Lidia, Redondo-González Olga, Tello Inmaculada, Collado-Vázquez Susana, Jiménez-Antona Carmen, Vojta Therapy versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for lumbosciatica syndrome: A quasi-experimental pilot study, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 24, 1, 2020. Crossref

  10. Paley Carole A., Wittkopf Priscilla G., Jones Gareth, Johnson Mark I., Does TENS Reduce the Intensity of Acute and Chronic Pain? A Comprehensive Appraisal of the Characteristics and Outcomes of 169 Reviews and 49 Meta-Analyses, Medicina, 57, 10, 2021. Crossref

  11. Wai Ying Kathryn Ning, While Alison, Pain relief in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: TENS, British Journal of Community Nursing, 12, 8, 2007. Crossref

Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции Цены и условия подписки Begell House Контакты Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain