Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
SJR: 0.121 SNIP: 0.228 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Печать: 0896-2960
ISSN Онлайн: 2162-6553

Выпуски:
Том 32, 2020 Том 31, 2019 Том 30, 2018 Том 29, 2017 Том 28, 2016 Том 27, 2015 Том 26, 2014 Том 25, 2013 Том 24, 2012 Том 23, 2011 Том 22, 2010 Том 21, 2009 Том 20, 2008 Том 19, 2007 Том 18, 2006 Том 17, 2005 Том 16, 2004 Том 15, 2003 Том 14, 2002 Том 13, 2001 Том 12, 2000 Том 11, 1999 Том 10, 1998 Том 9, 1997 Том 8, 1996 Том 7, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v19.i2.20
pages 97-113

Treatment and Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture in the Elderly

Hitoshi Kagaya
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
Yoichi Shimada
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Neuro and Locomotor Science, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan

Краткое описание

Hip fracture is common in the elderly, and its incidence is predicted to increase in many countries. This article focuses on femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, specifically discussing their classification, conservative and operative treatment, rehabilitation protocol, period of functional recovery, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), predictors for outcome, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The information was obtained from a Medline search of articles published in the English language literature. Femoral neck fractures should be classified into undisplaced and displaced fractures, and intertrochanteric fractures should be divided into stable and unstable fractures. Conservative treatment may be considered for undisplaced femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures, but most of these fractures have been operated on. Immediate unrestricted weight bearing after surgery does not seem to increase the failure of any types of hip fracture. The appropriate intensity for rehabilitation is still controversial. Home-based rehabilitation with early discharge may be an alternative. Motor ADL, IADL, and HRQOL increase following hip fracture, but the majority of patients do not regain their prefracture levels. Statistical models with predictive accuracy from an independent sample are useful to predict functional outcome.


Articles with similar content:

Factors Affecting Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture in the Elderly
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.16, 2004, issue 3
Marco Di Monaco
Prospective Case Series of NMES for Quadriceps Weakness and Decrease Function in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.25, 2015, issue 4
Anil Bhave, Jeffery J. Cherian, Mark J. McElroy, Michael A. Mont, Bhaveen V. Kapadia
Rehabilitation of Hip Fractures: a Review
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.10, 1998, issue 1
Eli Isakov, Reuben Eldar
Review of Lower Extremity Function Following SEMLS in Children with Cerebral Palsy
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.31, 2019, issue 2
Ashok Johari, Sailaxmi Ganesan, Triveni Shetty, Rajani Mullerpatan
Wrist Strength Measurement: A Review of the Reliability of Manual Muscle Testing and Hand-Held Dynamometry
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.14, 2002, issue 1
Esther May, Mary Russell, Monica Broniecki