Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
SJR: 0.121 SNIP: 0.228 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Печать: 0896-2960
ISSN Онлайн: 2162-6553

Выпуски:
Том 32, 2020 Том 31, 2019 Том 30, 2018 Том 29, 2017 Том 28, 2016 Том 27, 2015 Том 26, 2014 Том 25, 2013 Том 24, 2012 Том 23, 2011 Том 22, 2010 Том 21, 2009 Том 20, 2008 Том 19, 2007 Том 18, 2006 Том 17, 2005 Том 16, 2004 Том 15, 2003 Том 14, 2002 Том 13, 2001 Том 12, 2000 Том 11, 1999 Том 10, 1998 Том 9, 1997 Том 8, 1996 Том 7, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.2014011647
pages 145-164

A Structured Literature Synthesis to Identify Measures for Screening for the Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Individuals Following Distal Radius Fracture

Saurabh P. Mehta
School of Physical Therapy, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, USA
Joy C. MacDermid
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, L8S 1C7, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Clinical Research Lab, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
Julie Richardson
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Norma J MacIntyre
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
Ruby Grewal
Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada

Краткое описание

Previous research has indicated the need to screen for the risk for falls and fall-related fragility fractures following distal radius fracture (DRF) but has not specifically described how to do so. The objective of this review was to perform a systematic literature synthesis to derive a battery of measures to screen for the risk for falls and fall-related fractures in individuals with DRF. Using a systematic literature search and predefined inclusion criteria, this review identified selected measures that reflect the best evidence for the context for assessing these risks among patients with DRF. The results of this review indicate that the Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale and the Timed Up and Go Test have established psychometric properties and good potential for screening individuals with DRF who fear falling and have a balance impairment, respectively. The FRAX tool is suggested for computing the 10-year risk of hip fracture and a major osteoporotic fracture. Further research to validate the measures identified in this review is recommended.


Articles with similar content:

Hierarchy of Evidence: A Simple System for Orthopaedic Research?
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.17, 2007, issue 2
Juliana Kraeva, Mohit Bhandari, Julia Pemberton
The Ability to Transfer in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.9, 1997, issue 2
G. T. Allison
Review of Lower Extremity Function Following SEMLS in Children with Cerebral Palsy
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.31, 2019, issue 2
Ashok Johari, Sailaxmi Ganesan, Triveni Shetty, Rajani Mullerpatan
MODEL OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN THE ENTERPRISE
ENERGETIKA, Vol.2, 2005, issue 1
Piotras Bachanovas
Orthopedic Implant Value Drivers: A Qualitative Survey Study of Hospital Purchasing Administrators
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.25, 2015, issue 3
Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari, Christopher Vannabouathong, Chuan Silvia Li