图书馆订阅: Guest
国际能源材料和化学驱动期刊

每年出版 6 

ISSN 打印: 2150-766X

ISSN 在线: 2150-7678

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 0.7 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 0.7 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.1 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00016 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.18 SJR: 0.313 SNIP: 0.6 CiteScore™:: 1.6 H-Index: 16

Indexed in

SOLVENTLESS EXTRUDED DOUBLE-BASE (EDB) PROPELLANT CHARGES—A REVIEW OF THE PROPERTIES, TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS

卷 21, 册 3, 2022, pp. 13-46
DOI: 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.v21.i3.20
Get accessDownload

摘要

Extruded double-base (EDB) charges are used mainly due to their efflux having minimum smoke, attractive oxygen balance, and low corrosivity. The propellant class also has desirable burn-rate characteristics since it exhibits plateau burning and has a low temperature sensitivity to burning rate (πk). External ballistic modeling results are presented that illustrate the performance advantages that EDB propellants can provide, compared to more energetic propellants that are also not minimum smoke. For rocket motors, the plateau behavior is generally achieved by the inclusion of lead salts as ballistic modifiers, although these have had increasingly restricted availability, and lead-free alternatives are not yet generally in use. The manufacturing processes, both traditional batch and continuous, are described, including that used for medium- and large-caliber solventless gun propellants. The inhibition methods for rocket propellant charges are discussed. Strengths and weaknesses are considered together with potential developments in processing and materials (e.g., synthetic/nano cellulose). Various current and recent applications for such charges are reviewed, as well as insensitive munitions (IM) aspects. Consideration is also given to the maturity and potential further implementation of other minimum-smoke propellants to predict the future opportunities for solventless EDB propellants in the next five years. This includes an assessment of some historical issues that have arisen when propellant and motor technology advances have been attempted. This paper focuses on topics that are either new or have not been included in previous reviews; it includes more than 65 references.

参考文献
  1. Andres, H., Schadeli, U., Wagner, C., Vogelsanger, B., and Ryf, K., Nitrochemie's Serial and Future Sensitivity Reduced Nitrocellulose-Based Propelling Solutions, Nitrochemie Presentation, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Bristol, UK, April, 2006.

  2. Austruy, H., Double-Base Propellants, in Solid Rocket Propulsion Technology, A. Davenas, Ed., Oxford, UK: Pergamon, pp. 369-413,1993. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-040999-3.50014-X.

  3. Baker, A., Smokeless Propellants of Improved Performance, in AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 391 Smokeless Propellants, pp. 19-23, 1986.

  4. Bellotte, J., Cost Effective Large Diameter Rockets Using Extruded Propellant Rocket Motors, Joint Armaments Forum, Exhibition & TechnologyDemonstration, Phoenix, AZ, May, 2014.

  5. Blomshield, F.S., Historical Perspective of Combustion Instability in Motors-Case Studies, AIAA 2001-3875, 37th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, Salt Lake City, UT, July, 2001.

  6. Blomshield, F.S., Pressure Coupled Response of Solid Propellants, 8th International Symposium on Chemical Propulsion, Cape Town, South Africa, 2009.

  7. Bull, G.V. and Murphy, C.H., Paris Kanonen-The Paris Guns (Wilhelmgeschiitze) and Project HARP, E.S. Mittler&Sohn,p. 215,1991.

  8. Chiroli, M., Ciszek, F., and Baschung, B., Identification of Simulants for Additive Manufacturing of Gun Propellants, Proc. of 44th Int. Pyrotechnics Society Seminar, Tours, France, 2019.

  9. Collet, C., The Implementation of LOVA Propellants from Solventless EDB, Answer to Technical Question 2021-GBR-3038,2021, available only to MSIAC members upon request to MSIAC.

  10. Dahlberg, J., New Low-Sensitivity Modular Charge Propellant Based on GUDN, Proc. ofIM & EM Technology Symposium, Bristol, UK, April, 2006.

  11. Dahlberg, J. and Gustafsson, B., GUDN Propellants and the Uniflex 2 IM Modular Charge System, Proc. ofIM & EM Technology Symposium, Miami, FL, October, 2007.

  12. Davenas, A., Ed., Solid Rocket Propulsion Technology, 1st ed., Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1992.

  13. Davenas, A., The Main Families and Use of Solid Propellants, in Solid Rocket Propulsion Technology, A. Davenas, Ed., Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, pp. 369-413,1993. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-040999- 3.50013-8.

  14. Durand, S., Dubois, C., Lafleur, P., Panchal, V., Park, D., Paradis, P., and Lepage, D., Modeling of a Multilayered Propellant Extrusion in Concentric Cylinders, Proc. of COMSOL Conference, Boston, MA, October, 2015.

  15. Durand, S., Paradis, P.-Y., and Lepage, D., Method of Manufacturing Multi-Layered Propellant Grains, Patent No. WO2015021545, filed August 08,2014, and issued February 19,2015.

  16. Elghafour, A.M.A., Radwan, M.A., Mostafa, H.E., Fahd, A., and Elbasuney, S., Highly Energetic Nitramines: A Novel Platonizing Agent for Double-Base Propellants with Superior Combustion Characteristics, Fuel, vol. 227, pp. 478-484,2018.

  17. ECHA, Candidate List, accessed February 12, from https://echa.europa.eu/candidate-list-table/-/dislist/details/0b0236e1807dc49b, 2021.

  18. European Union, Study on the EU's List of Critical Raw Materials, accessed February 9, from https://rmis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/CRM_2020_F actsheets_critical_Final.pdf, 2020.

  19. Evans, G. and Smith, P.K., AIAA 1978-1568, 14th Joint Propulsion Conf., 1978.

  20. Fisher, M. and Sharp, M., Solid Rocket Propellants for Improved IM Response-Recent Activities in the NIMIC Nations, NATO Insensitive Munitions Information Center (NIMIC), RTO-MP-091, https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STOMeeting Proceedings/RTO-MP-091/MP-091-21.pdf,2003.

  21. Fleming, J. and Jones, C., IM Warheads and Rocket Motors for Tactical Missiles: Progress to Date, Future Opportunities and Challenges, Proc. ofIM& EMTechnology Symposium NDIA IMEMTS, Sevilla, Spain, 2019.

  22. Fleming, J., Bullock, S., and Sloan, M., The REACH Regulations and Implications for a Rocket Motor Manufacturer, in 10th Int. Symp. on Special Topics in Chemical Propulsion, Poitiers, France, 2010.

  23. Gautam, G.K., et al., Study of Energetic Nitramine Extruded Double-Base Propellants, Defence Sci. J, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 235-243,1998.

  24. Gligorijevic, N., State of the Propulsive-Group Development for Enhanced Anti-Armored Guided Missile, Scientific Technical Review, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 56-63,2018. DOI: 10.5937/str1803056M.

  25. Gonthier, B. and Tauzia, J., Minimum Smoke Rocket Motors with Silicone Inhibitors, AIAA 20th Joint Propulsion Conf., Cincinnati, OH, June, 1984.

  26. Gordon, S. and Evans, G., Combustion Inhibitors, Patent No. US4284592, filed January 15, 1980, and issued August 18,1981.

  27. Groundwater, F.M., Development of Gun Launched Rockets, MSc, Space Research Institute, Quebec, Canada, accessed February 27, 2021, from https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.item?id=TC-QMM-117802&op=pdf&app=Library&oclc_number=894503339,1965.

  28. Headrick, S.A., Demonstration and Validation for Lead Free Ballistic Modifier for Rocket Propellants, NDIA Joint Armaments Conf., Exhibition & Firing Demonstration, Dallas, TX, May, 2010.

  29. Holden, S., et al., Small Scale Fragment Attack Testing on the LMM Missile Boost Motor and the Influence of the Conduit Form on XDT Threshold, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Nashville, TN, September, 2016.

  30. Hong, J., Advanced Technology Demonstration Motor: Case-Bonded Extruded Double-Base Grain, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Sevilla, Spain, October, 2019.

  31. Kang, K., Lee, Y., Yeom, Y., Bang, G., and Yang, Y., Development of the Korean 2.75 Inch Rocket Propulsion System, Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers, The Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers, vol. 18, no. 3,pp. 70-77,2014. DOI: 10.6108/kspe.2014.18.3.070.

  32. Kentgens, H., Mackowiak, H.P., and Schoffl, R., Short-Action Solid Rocket Motors with Double-Base Propellants, Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 118-126,1996.

  33. Knobloch, J., Technologie der Ein-, Zwei-, undMehrbasigen Treibladungspulver, Carl Cranz Gesellschaft, Seminar WB 5.01, Technologie der Explosivstoffe, March, 2007.

  34. Lekke, E.A., Deschner, T., Kristensen, T.E., Jensen, T.L., and Unneberg, E., A New Generation of Minimum Smoke Propellants for Tactical Missile Propulsion, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Nashville, TN, September 12-15,2016.

  35. Manning, T.G., Thompson, D., Ellis, M., Lieb, R., Leadore, M., Colburn, J., Homan, B.E., Worrell, D.A., Moran, K.B., and Ritchie, S.J., Environmentally Friendly 'Green' Propellant for the Medium Caliber Training Rounds, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Bristol, UK, April, 2006.

  36. Manning, T.G., Leone, J., Zebregs, M., Ramlal, D.R., and van Driel, C.A., Definition of a JA-2 Equivalent Propellant to be Produced by Continuous Solventless Extrusion, J. Appl. Mech, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 031405-1-7,2013.

  37. ManTech, US Army, Cost Reduction of Solventless Propellants, accessed February 25, from https://www.armymantech.com/CRSolventlessP.php, 2021.

  38. MSIAC, Insensitive Munitions State of the Art, accessed October 31, 2021, from https://weblink .msiac .nato. int/Weblink/ElectronicFile. aspx?docid=623 813&dbid=0, April, 2019.

  39. MCM I TP 2015, accessed July 1, https://cwitp.com/media/PKs/MCM-ITP-2015-Press-Information-Pack .pdf, 2021.

  40. Muravyev,N.V, Meerov, D.B., Zharkov, M.N., andKuchurov, I.V., Combustion Performance of the Nanosized Nitrocellulose and Its Nanocomposites Produced by the Supercritical Antisolvent Processing, 12- ISICP, Paper 70663, March 23-25,2021.

  41. Office of the under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics, Rocket Motor Study, DUSD(A&T) Business Process Review, accessed February 9, 2020, from https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2008/systems/7265gonzalez.pdf, October 23, 2008.

  42. O'Meara, W.L. and Murray, T.A., Nitrocellulose Propellant Containing a Cellulosic Burn Rate Modifier, US Patent No. 5524544, filed July 1994, published 1996.

  43. Probster, M. and Schmucker, R.H., Ballistic Anomalies in Solid Rocket Motors Due to Migration Effects, Acta Astronauts, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 599-605,1986.

  44. Ritter, R., Baschung, B., and Franco, P., Increase of Gun Performance Using Co-Layered Propellants Based on NENA Formulations, Proc. of 38th Int. Annual Conf. of lCT, Karlsruhe, Germany, June, 2007.

  45. Rousseau, C., Leslie, M., Steyn, G., and Pretner, R., Cast Double Base: Propellant Designed to Meet Internal Ballistic Requirements, Proc. 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit, AIAA 2011-6138, July,2011.

  46. Rozumov, E., Ed., Recent Advances in Gun Propellant Development: From Molecules to Materials, Part of the book series Energetic Materials, Challenges and Advances in Computational Chemistry and Physics, vol. 25, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 23-65,2017.

  47. Roxel Group, Market Segments, Propulsion Systems, accessed July 14, from https://www.roxelgroup .com/en/market-segments/, 2021.

  48. Schaffers, P. and Stein, W., Experiences at Rheinmetall with the 35 mm LSP Test, Proc. of 36th Int. Annual Conf. of ICT, Karlsruhe, Germany, June, 2005.

  49. Schimansky, W.J.F., The Origin and Type of Cellulose Utilized in the Manufacture of Nitrocellulose over the Last Thirty Years, Nitrocellulose Symposium, accessed October 4, 2021, from https://www.cranfield.ac.Uk/-/media/files/school_specific_documents/cds/session-3-04-schimansky-the-origin-and-type-of-cellulose-u.ashx?la=en&hash=F79BFDF6CllAD3DFC9CCA8BF08C986D9D431 0E4C, Spiez, 2012.

  50. Sloan, M. and Wall, B., Rocket Propellant Characteristics as Influenced by Cellulose Type and Source, Nitrocellulose Conf., accessed July 14, 2021, from https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/-/media/files/school_specific_documents/cds/3-martin-sloan-roxelukrm-rocket-propcharacby-cellulose.a shx?la=en&hash=D9E93D68AEB69EBED21040B133E9FAC34D89F4DD, Aldermaston, 2007.

  51. Strickland, A. and Nugeyre, J-C., A Scientific Review of the Current State of IM Mitigation Devices for Use with Rocket Motor Systems and the Future Development Outlook, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Miami, FL, October, 2007.

  52. Strickland, A., Nugeyre, J.-C., Coleno, R., and Zanelli, D., Roxel IM Technology, Analysis of Trial Results, Future IM Programmes in France and UK, Proc. of lM & EM Technology Symposium, Tucson, AZ, May, 2009.

  53. Strickland, A., Development of IM Brimstone Rocket Motor; An IM, Minimum Smoke, Air-Launched System, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Rome, Italy, May, 2015.

  54. Sutton, G.P. andBiblarz, O., Rocket Propulsion Elements, 7th ed., Wiley, 2001.

  55. Szala, M., Development Trends in Artillery Ammunition Propellants, High Energy Materials, vol. 12, no. 2, 2020.

  56. Tauzia, J.-M., Thermal Insulation, Liners and Inhibitors, in Solid Rocket Propulsion Technology, A. Davenas, Ed., Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1993.

  57. Thomas, G.W., Prickett, S.E., Richman, S.A., Radack, C.M., Cassell, E., Michienzi, M., Murphy, C.M., and Newton, W., 2.75-Inch Rocket Motor Manufacturing Waste Minimization Project, Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP WP-9804), Indian Head Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head, MD, accessed September 20, 2021, from https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA608415.pdf, June, 2006.

  58. Thompson, D., Lead-Free Ballistic Modifier for Rocket Motor Propellants, Final Report ESTCP Project WP-200727, May, 2015.

  59. Torry, S., et al., Bacterial Cellulose-Analysis and Nitration, Presentation, QinetiQ/16/01844, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK, June, 2016.

  60. Tunestal, E., et al., Reaching a Continuous Propellant Production Process, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Nashville, TN, September, 2016.

  61. Turner, D., Development of an IM Compliant, Minimum Smoke, Double Base Propellant Rocket Motor Containing Refractory Materials, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symp., Sevilla, Spain, October, 2019.

  62. van Driel, C.A., Zebregs, M., and Ramlal, D.R., Continuous Solvent-Free Extrusion of Propellant for 35 mm Calibre Ammunition, Proc. of 29th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, Edinburgh, UK, May, 2016.

  63. van Driel, C.A., Zebregs, M., Ramlal, D.R., and Straathof, M.H., Co-Layered Propellant Charge, Patent EP3444234A1, filed 2017, published 2019.

  64. van Lingen, J., et al., 3D Printing of Gun Propellants, Proc. of 43rd Int. Pyrotechnics Society Seminar, Fort Collins, CO, July, 2018.

  65. Vogelsanger, B., et al., Tomorrow's LOVA-Propellants-Polymer-bonded or Nitrocellulose-Based?, Nitrochemie presentation, Proc. of 35th Int. Annual Conf. of ICT, Karlsruhe, Germany, June, 2004.

  66. Vogelsanger, B., Huber, A., and Jaskolka, H., Insensitive Propulsion Systems for Large Caliber Ammunition, Nitrochemie presentation, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Miami, FL, October, 2007.

  67. Volk, F. and Helmut, H., Influence of Energetic Materials on the Energy-Output of Gun Propellants, Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 120-124,1997.

  68. Warren, L.R., A Review of the Catalytic Effects of Lead-Based Ballistic Modifiers on the Combustion Chemistry of Double Base Propellants, Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 13-25,2021.

  69. Zebregs M., et al., Scaling Up of Gun Propellant Co-Extrusion Using Simulation Software, Proc. of 38th Int. Annual Conf. ofICT, Karlsruhe, Germany, June, 2007.

  70. Zebregs, M. and van Driel, C.A., Experimental Set-Up and Results of the Process of Co-Extruded Perforated Gun Propellants, Proc. of IM & EM Technology Symposium, Tucson, AZ, May, 2009.

Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集 订购及政策 Begell House 联系我们 Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain