Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Erscheint 6 Ausgaben pro Jahr

ISSN Druckformat: 1072-8325

ISSN Online: 1940-431X

SJR: 0.514 SNIP: 0.875 CiteScore™:: 2.4 H-Index: 27

Indexed in

EVALUATING EQUITY IN STATEWIDE SYSTEMIC INITIATIVES: ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS

Volumen 4, Ausgabe 2&3, 1998, pp. 161-181
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v4.i2-3.60
Get accessGet access

ABSTRAKT

Evaluation of systemic education reforms is a rapidly evolving area in practice and theory. Generation of evaluation questions congruent with current understandings of systemic education reform initiatives and their central concerns, such as equity, will enhance the practice and usefulness of evaluation of systemic initiatives in science and mathematics education. Good evaluation questions represent the interests of all stakeholding audiences and address all levels of the educational system. They prompt answers that provide evidence of fundamental changes and strong linkages throughout the educational system. Matrix thinking provides a tool for generating a sound set of evaluation questions to guide evaluations of systemic initiatives. Evaluation questions generated through matrix thinking are suited to the decision-making needs of systemic education reform and to innovative evaluation methodologies and analyses.

REFERENZIERT VON
  1. Plunk Andrew D., Tate William F., Bierut Laura J., Grucza Richard A., Intended and Unintended Effects of State-Mandated High School Science and Mathematics Course Graduation Requirements on Educational Attainment, Educational Researcher, 43, 5, 2014. Crossref

Zukünftige Artikel

Mitigating Barriers, Scaffolding Success: Institutional Supports for Black Undergraduate Women in Engineering Programs Meseret Hailu, Neelakshi Rajeev Tewari, Brooke Coley Underrepresented Students Pursuing Mathematics-Intensive Degrees: Changes after Transitioning to College Alison Marzocchi What do STEM Clubs do? The Effect of College Club Participation on Career Confidence and Gender Inclusion Guillermo Dominguez Garcia, Jennifer Glass Validating Practices and Messages that Promote Women’s Engineering Classroom Belongingness: An Intersectional Approach Dina Verdin, A Lili Castillo Examining the Role of Institutional Support on International Doctoral Women’s STEM Persistence and Mental Health Aisha Farra, Aashika Anantharaman, Sarah Swanson, Kerrie Wilkins-Yel, Jennifer Bekki, Nedim Yel, Ashley Randall, Bianca Bernstein Searching for safe space: Student veterans’ uneven pathways to STEM careers by race Brittany Hunt, Jae Hoon Lim Does Race, Ethnicity or Gender of the Mentor Affect Whether They Will be a “Good Mentor”? A Qualitative Analysis of Students’ Perceptions Reuben May, Christine Stanley, America Soto-Arzat, Jennifer Ackerman PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND TEAM MEMBER EFFECTIVENESS OF MINORITIZED STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Behzad Beigpourian, Matthew Ohland Perceptions of Department Chair Roles and Responsibilities in Career Progression and Success of Women STEM Faculty Stephanie Jones, Patricia Ryan Pal “Barbed-Wire Boundaries”: Hidden Curriculum, First-Generation and Low-Income Engineering Students, and Internship Acquisition Jerry Yang, Joseph Towles, Sheri Sheppard, Sara Atwood “I Want to Make an Impact”: The Science Identity and Career Goals of Black and Latinx Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars Sylvia Mendez, Kathryn Watson, Kathryn Starkey, Valerie Conley Care Work, Science Brokering, and Career Motivations: How Hispanic/Latinx Young Adults in STEM Express Social Agency during the COVID-19 Pandemic Angela Frederick, Angelica Monarrez, Danielle Morales Bridging the gap: A sequential mixed methods study of trust networks in graduate application, admissions, and enrollment Cynthia Villarreal, Julie Posselt, Theresa Hernandez, Alexander Rudolph
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen Preise und Aborichtlinien Begell House Kontakt Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain