Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Erscheint 6 Ausgaben pro Jahr

ISSN Druckformat: 1072-8325

ISSN Online: 1940-431X

SJR: 0.514 SNIP: 0.875 CiteScore™:: 2.4 H-Index: 27

Indexed in

WHY (AND HOW) DO WOMEN ENGINEERS STAY?: A POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING THE CAREER SUSTAINABILITY OF WOMEN IN ENGINEERING

Volumen 30, Ausgabe 3, 2024, pp. 99-122
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022040353
Get accessGet access

ABSTRAKT

Much of the research on the attrition of women in engineering has identified the existence of gender bias and the disproportionate challenges women engineers face as the primary reasons women leave the profession. While noteworthy, researchers have not focused their investigations on why (and how) women who stay in the field do so. The present study utilized a positive psychology lens to explore factors that have supported career sustainability for women who have remained in the engineering field. Phenomenological data analysis was used to examine interviews with 14 women in engineering. A model of career sustainability was developed, which yielded six internal (psychological) and two external (environmental) factors. Internal factors included navigating sexism, work attitudes and behavior, stress management, self-concept, work-life-family balance, and interpersonal strategies. External factors included social supports and workplace characteristics. This career sustainability model is likely applicable to aspiring youth, students of engineering, early-career engineers, senior practicing engineers, managers, and organizational leaders of all genders, as the engineers who participated in the study provided inspiring, creative strategies and reflections about how they have thrived.

REFERENZEN
  1. American Association of University Women (AAUW). (1994). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America. American Association of University Women. Retrieved from https://www.aauwbakersfield.com/uploads/9/6/2/5/96257912/shortchanging_girls_shortchanging_america.pdf.

  2. Berg, S. H. (2006). Everyday sexism and posttraumatic stress disorder in women. Violence against Women, 12(10), 970-988. DOI: 10.1177/1077801206293082.

  3. Bloom, S. L. (1997). Creating sanctuary: Toward the evolution of sane societies. Routledge.

  4. Cech, E. A. (2013). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 42-72. DOI: 10.1177/0162243913504305.

  5. Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice, 15(3), 241-247. DOI: 10.1037/h0086006.

  6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

  7. Davis, A. (2018). Angela Davis criticizes "mainstream feminism"/mourgeois feminism [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzQkVfO9ToQ.

  8. DuBrin, A. J. (2011). Impression management in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice. Taylor & Francis.

  9. Fouad, N. A., Chang, W., Wan, M., & Singh, R. (2017). Women's reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875.

  10. Fouad, N. A., Fitzpatrick, M. E., & Liu, J. P. (2011). Persistence of women in engineering careers: A qualitative study of current and former female engineers. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 69-96.

  11. Fouad, N. A., & Singh, R. (2011). Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Final report from NSF Award, 827553. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NSF_Stemming%20the%20Tide%20Why%20Women%20Leave%20Engineering.pdf.

  12. Girl Scout Research Institute (GSRI). (2012). Generation STEM: What girls say about science, technology, engineering, and math. Retrieved from https://www.girlscouts.org/content/dam/girlscouts-gsusa/forms-and-documents/about-girl-scouts/research/generation_stem_full_report.pdf.

  13. Glass, J. L., Sassler, S., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2013). What's so special about STEM? A comparison of women's retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces, 92(2), 723-756. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sot092.

  14. Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. HBS No. 10094. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

  15. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517-572. DOI: 10.1177/0011000097254001.

  16. Hunt, J. (2016). Why do women leave science and engineering? Journal of Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 69. DOI: 10.3386/w15853.

  17. Lamb, S., & Brown, L. M. (2007). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers' schemes. First St. Martin's Griffin.

  18. Lindley, P. A., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., & Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 3-16.

  19. McIlwee, J. S., & Robinson, J. G. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. State University of New York Press.

  20. National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Bachelor's, master's, and doctor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2017-18. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_318.30.asp.

  21. National Science Foundation. (2019). Employed scientists and engineers, by sector of employment, broad occupation, sex, ethnicity, race, and disability status: 2019. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables#group6.

  22. Raabe, I. J., Boda, Z., & Stadtfeld, C. (2019). The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap. Sociology of Education, 92(2), 105-123. DOI: 10.1177/0038040718824095.

  23. Robinson, J. G., & McIlwee, J. S., (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 403-421. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00166.x.

  24. Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

  25. Sassler, S., Glass, J., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2017). The missing women in STEM? Assessing gender differentials in the factors associated with transition to first jobs. Social Science Research, 63, 192-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.014.

  26. Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 147. DOI: 10.2307/353890.

  27. Seron, C., Silbey, S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2015). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segmentation. Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178-214.

  28. Silbey, S. S. (2016). Why do so many women who study engineering leave the field? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/08/why-do-so-many-women-who-study-engineering-leavethe-field.

  29. Society of Women Engineers. (2022). Research and trends for women in STEM. Retrieved from https://swe.org/research/2022/earning-gap/.

  30. Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754-760.

  31. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat09.htm.

Zukünftige Artikel

Mitigating Barriers, Scaffolding Success: Institutional Supports for Black Undergraduate Women in Engineering Programs Meseret Hailu, Neelakshi Rajeev Tewari, Brooke Coley Underrepresented Students Pursuing Mathematics-Intensive Degrees: Changes after Transitioning to College Alison Marzocchi What do STEM Clubs do? The Effect of College Club Participation on Career Confidence and Gender Inclusion Guillermo Dominguez Garcia, Jennifer Glass Validating Practices and Messages that Promote Women’s Engineering Classroom Belongingness: An Intersectional Approach Dina Verdin, A Lili Castillo Examining the Role of Institutional Support on International Doctoral Women’s STEM Persistence and Mental Health Aisha Farra, Aashika Anantharaman, Sarah Swanson, Kerrie Wilkins-Yel, Jennifer Bekki, Nedim Yel, Ashley Randall, Bianca Bernstein Searching for safe space: Student veterans’ uneven pathways to STEM careers by race Brittany Hunt, Jae Hoon Lim Does Race, Ethnicity or Gender of the Mentor Affect Whether They Will be a “Good Mentor”? A Qualitative Analysis of Students’ Perceptions Reuben May, Christine Stanley, America Soto-Arzat, Jennifer Ackerman PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND TEAM MEMBER EFFECTIVENESS OF MINORITIZED STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Behzad Beigpourian, Matthew Ohland Perceptions of Department Chair Roles and Responsibilities in Career Progression and Success of Women STEM Faculty Stephanie Jones, Patricia Ryan Pal “Barbed-Wire Boundaries”: Hidden Curriculum, First-Generation and Low-Income Engineering Students, and Internship Acquisition Jerry Yang, Joseph Towles, Sheri Sheppard, Sara Atwood “I Want to Make an Impact”: The Science Identity and Career Goals of Black and Latinx Science and Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars Sylvia Mendez, Kathryn Watson, Kathryn Starkey, Valerie Conley Care Work, Science Brokering, and Career Motivations: How Hispanic/Latinx Young Adults in STEM Express Social Agency during the COVID-19 Pandemic Angela Frederick, Angelica Monarrez, Danielle Morales Bridging the gap: A sequential mixed methods study of trust networks in graduate application, admissions, and enrollment Cynthia Villarreal, Julie Posselt, Theresa Hernandez, Alexander Rudolph
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen Preise und Aborichtlinien Begell House Kontakt Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain