Erscheint 6 Ausgaben pro Jahr
ISSN Druckformat: 1072-8325
ISSN Online: 1940-431X
Indexed in
WHY (AND HOW) DO WOMEN ENGINEERS STAY?: A POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING THE CAREER SUSTAINABILITY OF WOMEN IN ENGINEERING
ABSTRAKT
Much of the research on the attrition of women in engineering has identified the existence of gender bias and the disproportionate challenges women engineers face as the primary reasons women leave the profession. While noteworthy, researchers have not focused their investigations on why (and how) women who stay in the field do so. The present study utilized a positive psychology lens to explore factors that have supported career sustainability for women who have remained in the engineering field. Phenomenological data analysis was used to examine interviews with 14 women in engineering. A model of career sustainability was developed, which yielded six internal (psychological) and two external (environmental) factors. Internal factors included navigating sexism, work attitudes and behavior, stress management, self-concept, work-life-family balance, and interpersonal strategies. External factors included social supports and workplace characteristics. This career sustainability model is likely applicable to aspiring youth, students of engineering, early-career engineers, senior practicing engineers, managers, and organizational leaders of all genders, as the engineers who participated in the study provided inspiring, creative strategies and reflections about how they have thrived.
-
American Association of University Women (AAUW). (1994). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America. American Association of University Women. Retrieved from https://www.aauwbakersfield.com/uploads/9/6/2/5/96257912/shortchanging_girls_shortchanging_america.pdf.
-
Berg, S. H. (2006). Everyday sexism and posttraumatic stress disorder in women. Violence against Women, 12(10), 970-988. DOI: 10.1177/1077801206293082.
-
Bloom, S. L. (1997). Creating sanctuary: Toward the evolution of sane societies. Routledge.
-
Cech, E. A. (2013). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 42-72. DOI: 10.1177/0162243913504305.
-
Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice, 15(3), 241-247. DOI: 10.1037/h0086006.
-
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
-
Davis, A. (2018). Angela Davis criticizes "mainstream feminism"/mourgeois feminism [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzQkVfO9ToQ.
-
DuBrin, A. J. (2011). Impression management in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice. Taylor & Francis.
-
Fouad, N. A., Chang, W., Wan, M., & Singh, R. (2017). Women's reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875.
-
Fouad, N. A., Fitzpatrick, M. E., & Liu, J. P. (2011). Persistence of women in engineering careers: A qualitative study of current and former female engineers. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 69-96.
-
Fouad, N. A., & Singh, R. (2011). Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Final report from NSF Award, 827553. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NSF_Stemming%20the%20Tide%20Why%20Women%20Leave%20Engineering.pdf.
-
Girl Scout Research Institute (GSRI). (2012). Generation STEM: What girls say about science, technology, engineering, and math. Retrieved from https://www.girlscouts.org/content/dam/girlscouts-gsusa/forms-and-documents/about-girl-scouts/research/generation_stem_full_report.pdf.
-
Glass, J. L., Sassler, S., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2013). What's so special about STEM? A comparison of women's retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces, 92(2), 723-756. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sot092.
-
Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. HBS No. 10094. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
-
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517-572. DOI: 10.1177/0011000097254001.
-
Hunt, J. (2016). Why do women leave science and engineering? Journal of Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 69. DOI: 10.3386/w15853.
-
Lamb, S., & Brown, L. M. (2007). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers' schemes. First St. Martin's Griffin.
-
Lindley, P. A., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., & Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 3-16.
-
McIlwee, J. S., & Robinson, J. G. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. State University of New York Press.
-
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Bachelor's, master's, and doctor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2017-18. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_318.30.asp.
-
National Science Foundation. (2019). Employed scientists and engineers, by sector of employment, broad occupation, sex, ethnicity, race, and disability status: 2019. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables#group6.
-
Raabe, I. J., Boda, Z., & Stadtfeld, C. (2019). The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap. Sociology of Education, 92(2), 105-123. DOI: 10.1177/0038040718824095.
-
Robinson, J. G., & McIlwee, J. S., (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 403-421. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00166.x.
-
Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
-
Sassler, S., Glass, J., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2017). The missing women in STEM? Assessing gender differentials in the factors associated with transition to first jobs. Social Science Research, 63, 192-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.014.
-
Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 147. DOI: 10.2307/353890.
-
Seron, C., Silbey, S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2015). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segmentation. Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178-214.
-
Silbey, S. S. (2016). Why do so many women who study engineering leave the field? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/08/why-do-so-many-women-who-study-engineering-leavethe-field.
-
Society of Women Engineers. (2022). Research and trends for women in STEM. Retrieved from https://swe.org/research/2022/earning-gap/.
-
Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754-760.
-
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat09.htm.