Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Erscheint 4 Ausgaben pro Jahr

ISSN Druckformat: 0896-2960

ISSN Online: 2162-6553

SJR: 0.141 SNIP: 0.129 CiteScore™:: 0.6 H-Index: 18

Indexed in

Physical Function Assessment Tools in the Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review

Volumen 34, Ausgabe 1, 2022, pp. 1-16
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.2021040542
Get accessDownload

ABSTRAKT

Prolonged immobilization and bed rest in critically ill patients leads to loss of physical functional ability. Therefore, assessment of physical functional ability during intensive care unit (ICU) stay and at discharge plays a central role in planning early intervention and instituting rehabilitation measures to improve physical function outcomes. Various scales have been developed, modified, and applied to assess functional ability, impairments, and disabilities in ICU patients. The selection of the most appropriate assessment scale depends on the specific patient population, the diagnosis, the phase of rehabilitation and the psychometric properties of the measurement tool. This narrative review aims to describe the various physical function assessment tools applicable to patients in the ICU, to determine the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity, and to summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each of these scales in order to enable clinicians to make an informed choice while selecting outcome variables during rehabilitation of patients in the critical care unit.

REFERENZEN
  1. Topp R, Ditmyer M, King K, Doherty K, Hornyak J III. The effect of bed rest and potential of prehabilitation on patients in the intensive care unit. AACN Clin Issues. 2002;13:263-76.

  2. Morris PE. Moving our critically ill patients: Mobility barriers and benefits. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:1-20.

  3. Perme C, Chandrashekar R. Early mobility and walking program for patients in intensive care units: Creating a standard of care. Am J Crit Care. 2009 May 1;18(3):212-1.

  4. Van der Schaaf M, Dettling DS, Beelen A, Lucas C, Dongelmans DA, Nollet F. Poor functional status immediately after discharge from an intensive care unit. Disabil Rehabil. 2008 Jan 1;30(23):1812-8.

  5. Bakhru RN, Davidson JF, Bookstaver RE, Kenes MT, Welborn KG, Morris PE, Files DC. Physical function impairment in survivors of critical illness in an ICU recovery clinic. J Crit Care. 2018 Jun 1;45:163-9.

  6. Parry SM, Huang M, Needham DM. Evaluating physical functioning in critical care: Considerations for clinical practice and research. Crit Care. 2017 Dec;21(1):249.

  7. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1:480-4.

  8. Conlon N, O'Brien B, Herbison GP, Marsh B. Long-term functional outcome and performance status after intensive care unit re-admission: A prospective survey. Brit J Anaesth. 2008;100:219-23.

  9. McMillan T, Wilson L, Ponsford J, Levin H, Teasdale G, Bond M. The glasgow outcome scale-40 years of application and refinement. Nature Rev Neurol. 2016 Aug;12(8):477-85.

  10. Weir J, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Lu J, Lingsma HF, McHugh GS, Roozenbeek B, Maas AI, Murray GD. Does the extended glasgow outcome scale add value to the conventional glasgow outcome scale? J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):53-8.

  11. Anderson SI, Housley AM, Jones PA, Slattery J, Miller JD. Glasgow outcome score: An inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj. 1993;7:309-17.

  12. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond agitation-sedation scale: Validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44.

  13. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index: A simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. MD State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5.

  14. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL index: A reliability study. Int Disabil Studies. 1988 Jan 1;10(2):61-3.

  15. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989 Jan 1;42(8):703-9.

  16. Yang CM, Wang YC, Lee CH, Chen MH, Hsieh CL. A comparison of test-retest reliability and random measurement error of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Sep 4:1-5.

  17. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Topics Geriatr Rehabil. 1986 Apr 1;1(3):59-74.

  18. D'Andrea A, Le Peillet D, Fassier T, Prendki V, Trombert V, Reny JL, Roux X. Functional independence measure score is associated with mortality in critically ill elderly patients admitted to an intermediate care unit. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec;20(1):1-8.

  19. Montagnani G, Vagheggini G, Panait Vlad E, Berrighi D, Pantani L, Ambrosino N. Use of the functional independence measure in people for whom weaning from mechanical ventilation is difficult. Phys Ther. 2011 Jul 1;91(7):1109-15.

  20. Thrush A, Rozek M, Dekerlegand JL. The clinical utility of the functional status score for the intensive care unit (FSS-ICU) at a long-term acute care hospital: A prospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2012 Dec 1;92(12):1536-45.

  21. Huang M, Chan KS, Zanni JM, Parry SM, Neto SC, Neto JA, da Silva VZ, Kho ME, Needham DM. functional status score for the intensive care unit (FSS-ICU): An international clinimetric analysis of validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference. Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;44(12): e1155.

  22. Akerman E, Fridlund B, Ersson A, Granberg-Axell A. Development of the 3-SET 4P questionnaire for evaluating former ICU patients' physical and psychosocial problems over time: A pilot study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Apr 1;25(2):80-9.

  23. Akerman E, Fridlund B, Samuelson K, Baigi A, Ersson A. Psychometric evaluation of 3-set 4P questionnaire. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 013 Feb 1;29(1):40-7.

  24. Skinner EH, Berney S, Warrillow S, Denehy L. Development of a physical function outcome measure (PFIT) and a pilot exercise training protocol for use in intensive care. Crit Care Resus. 2009;11:110-5.

  25. Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, Berney S. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: Validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored). Phys Ther. 2013 Dec 1;93(12):1636-45.

  26. Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984 Mar;2(3):187-93.

  27. Grieco A, Long CJ. Investigation of the Karnofsky performance status as a measure of quality of life. Health Psychol. 1984;3(2):129.

  28. Nikoletti S, Porock D, Kristjanson LJ, Medigovich K, Pedler P, Smith M. Performance status assessment in home hospice patients using a modified form of the Karnofsky performance status scale. J Palliat Med. 2000 Sep 1;3(3):301-11.

  29. Silva CH, Morais SS, Sarian LO, Derchain SF. Association of the Karnofsky performance scale with the quality of life of Brazilian women undergoing palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2011 Jun;27(2):164-9.

  30. Qeltek NY, Suren M, Demir O, Okan 1. Karnofsky performance scale validity and reliability of Turkish palliative cancer patients. Turkish J Med Sci. 2019 Jun 18;49(3):894-8.

  31. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, van Gijn J. Inter-observer agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604-7.

  32. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Modification of rankin scale: Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497-500.

  33. Zhao H, Collier JM, Quah DM, Purvis T, Bernhardt J. The modified rankin scale in acute stroke has good inter-rater- reliability but questionable validity. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29:188-93.

  34. Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Mar 1;63(3):118-23.

  35. Eliason MR, Topp BW. Predictive validity of Rappaport's disability rating scale in subjects with acute brain dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1984;64:1357-60.

  36. Struchen MA, Hannay HJ, Contant CF, Robertson CS. The relation between acute physiological variables and outcome on the glasgow outcome scale and disability rating scale following severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001 Feb 1;18(2):115-25.

  37. Reid JC, Clarke F, Cook DJ, Molloy A, Rudkowski JC, Stratford P, Kho ME. Feasibility, reliability, responsiveness, and validity of the patient-reported functional scale for the intensive care unit: A pilot study. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1396-404.

  38. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185(12):914-9.

  39. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970 Mar 1;10:20-30.

  40. Silveira LT, Silva JM, Soler JM, Sun CY, Tanaka C, Fu C. Assessing functional status after intensive care unit stay: The Barthel index and the Katz Index. Int J Quality Health Care. 2018 May 1;30(4):265-70.

  41. Hartigan I. A comparative review of the Katz ADL and the Barthel index in assessing the activities of daily living of older people. Int J Older People Nurs. 2007 Sep;2(3):204-12.

  42. Corner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, Thomas A, Grant RL, Nikoletou D, Soni N. The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): Validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population: An observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2013 Mar 1;99(1):33-41.

  43. Corner EJ, Soni N, Handy JM, Brett SJ. Construct validity of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool: An observational study of recovery from critical illness. Crit Care. 2014 Apr;18(2):1-0.

  44. Corner EJ, Hichens LV, Attrill KM, Vizcaychipi MP, Brett SJ, Handy JM. The responsiveness of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: An observational study. Burns. 2015 Mar 1;41(2):241-7.

  45. Whelan M, Van Aswegen H, Corner E. Impact of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment (CPAx) tool on clinical outcomes of surgical and trauma patients in an intensive care unit: An experimental study. South African J Physiother. 2018 May 7;74(1):1-8.

  46. Klok FA, Boon GJ, Barco S, Endres M, Geelhoed JM, Knauss S, Rezek SA, Spruit MA, Vehreschild J, Siegerink B. The post-COVID-19 functional status scale: A tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19. Eur Resp J. 2020 Jul 1;56(1).

  47. Mohamed-Hussein A, Galal I, Saad M, Zayan HE, Abdelsayed M, Moustafa M, Ezzat AR, Helmy R, Abd Elaal H, Aly K, Abderheem S. Post-COVID-19 functional status: Relation to age, smoking, hospitalization and comorbidities. MedRxiv. 2020 Jan 1.

  48. Perme C, Nawa RK, Winkelman C, Masud F. A tool to assess mobility status in critically ill patients: The perme intensive care unit mobility score. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J. 2014 Jan;10(1):41.

  49. Timenetsky KT, Serpa Neto A, Lazarin AC, Pardini A, Moreira CR, Correa TD, Caserta Eid RA, Nawa RK. The perme mobility index: A new concept to assess mobility level in patients with coronavirus (COVID-19) infection. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0250180.

  50. Wilches Luna EC, de Oliveira AS, Perme C, Gastaldi AC. Spanish version of the perme intensive care unit mobility score: Minimal detectable change and responsiveness. Physiother Res Int. 2021 Jan;26(1):e1875.

  51. Kawaguchi YM, Nawa RK, Figueiredo TB, Martins L, Pires-Neto RC. Perme intensive care unit mobility score and ICU mobility scale: Translation into Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil. J Brasil Pneumol. 2016 Nov;42:429-34.

  52. Nydahl P, Wilkens S, Glase S, Mohr LM, Richter P, Klarmann S, Perme CS, Nawa RK. The German translation of the Perme intensive care unit mobility score and inter-rater reliability between physio-therapists and nurses. Eur J Physiother. 2018 Apr 3;20(2):109-15.

  53. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formosan Med Assoc. 2001 Aug 1;100(8):526-32.

  54. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb 1;75(2):127-32.

  55. Huang M, Chan KS, Zanni JM, Parry SM, Neto SC, Neto JA, da Silva VZ, Kho ME, Needham DM. Functional status score for the intensive care unit (FSS-ICU): An international clinimetric analysis of validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference. Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):e1155.

  56. Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, Berney S. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: Validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored). Phys Ther. 2013 Dec 1;93(12):1636-45.

  57. Costigan FA, Rochwerg B, Molloy AJ, McCaughan M, Millen T, Reid JC, Farley C, Patterson L, Kho ME. I SURVIVE: Inter-rater reliability of three physical functional outcome measures in intensive care unit survivors. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2019 Oct;66(10):1173-83.

  58. Reid JC, Clarke F, Cook DJ, Molloy A, Rudkowski JC, Stratford P, Kho ME. Feasibility, reliability, responsiveness, and validity of the patient-reported functional scale for the intensive care unit: A pilot study. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1396-404.

  59. Terret C, Albrand G, Moncenix G, Droz JP. Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) or physical performance test (PPT)? That is the question. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2011 Feb 1;77(2):142-7.

  60. Krch D, Lequerica AH. The factor structure of the disability rating scale in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan 2;41(1):98-103.

  61. Broderick JP, Adeoye O, Elm J. Evolution of the modified rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):2007-12.

  62. Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: Clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interventions Aging. 2013;8:201.

  63. Alaparthi GK, Gatty A, Samuel SR, Amaravadi SK. Effectiveness, safety, and barriers to early mobilization in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Res Pract. 2020 Nov 26;2020.

  64. Nawa RK, Lettvin C, Winkelman C, Evora PR, Perme C. Initial interrater reliability for a novel measure of patient mobility in a cardiovascular intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2014 Jun 1;29(3):475-e1.

REFERENZIERT VON
  1. Camilo Ferreira Ráisa, Moorhead Sue Ann, Zuchatti Bruna Valentina, Correia Marisa Dibbern Lopes, Montanari Fabio Luis, Duran Erika Christiane Marocco, Nursing interventions and activities for patients with multiple traumas: An integrative review, International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 2022. Crossref

Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen Preise und Aborichtlinien Begell House Kontakt Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain