Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Erscheint 4 Ausgaben pro Jahr

ISSN Druckformat: 0896-2960

ISSN Online: 2162-6553

SJR: 0.141 SNIP: 0.129 CiteScore™:: 0.6 H-Index: 18

Indexed in

A Review of Clinical Balance Tools for Use With Elderly Populations

Volumen 15, Ausgabe 3&4, 2003, 40 pages
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v15.i34.10
Get accessGet access

ABSTRAKT

This article attempts to critically review the literature supporting the use of commonly used clinical balance tools. A number of tools have been developed over the past 15 years or so with the objective of measuring postural control in the clinic to identify postural deficits occurring because of both aging and pathological effects and some have been described as discriminating between fallers and nonfallers. Although a few studies examined reliability, validity and sensitivity of some of the tools in common use, others are not supported by rigorous studies. Claims that some tools can be used to predict future falls are debated in the literature with some authors suggesting that there is insufficient evidence to support a particular tool as the most appropriate. Because of the complexity of postural control, a task requiring constant adjustments, both for internal instability (such as upper limb tasks), or external perturbations (due to environmental situations), the quest for one clinical balance tool to measure this maybe inappropriate. This review briefly defines postural control, discusses tests commonly described in the literature, their validity and reliability and their usefulness and relevance to professionals. The review is broadly organized into static, dynamic, timed and subjective tests and highlights the need for more studies to determine validity and reliability to support use of these tools.

REFERENZIERT VON
  1. Batson Glenna, Feltman Rebecca, McBride Chris, Waring Jennifer, Effect of Mental Practice Combined with Physical Practice on Balance in the Community-Dwelling Elderly, Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 31, 2, 2007. Crossref

  2. Haines Terry, Kuys Suzanne S., Morrison Greg, Clarke Jane, Bew Paul, McPhail Steven, Development and Validation of the Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 12, 2007. Crossref

  3. Edginton Bigelow K., Berme N., Development of a Protocol for Improving the Clinical Utility of Posturography as a Fall-Risk Screening Tool, The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 66A, 2, 2011. Crossref

  4. Clark Ross A., Pua Yong-Hao, Fortin Karine, Ritchie Callan, Webster Kate E., Denehy Linda, Bryant Adam L., Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control, Gait & Posture, 36, 3, 2012. Crossref

  5. Sabchuk Renata Alyne Czajka, Bento Paulo Cesar Barauce, Rodacki André Luiz Félix, Comparação entre testes de equilíbrio de campo e plataforma de força, Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 18, 6, 2012. Crossref

  6. Nascimento Marcelo de Maio, Silva Paloma Sthefane Teles, Sensory assessment of balance regulation of physically active women, 60-79 years old, Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging, 15, 2021. Crossref

Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen Preise und Aborichtlinien Begell House Kontakt Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain